Cited by 89Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchResilience and Mental HealthDisaster Management and Resilience

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Longitudinal Study of the Bidirectional Relationship Between Social Support and Posttraumatic Stress Following a Natural Disaster

Open access
Platt, Jonathan M., Lowe, Sarah R., Galea, Sandro, Norris, Fran H., Koenen, Karestan C.·2016·Journal of Traumatic Stress

Abstract

There is ample evidence that social support is protective against posttraumatic stress (PTS) symptoms through social causation processes. It is also likely that PTS is associated with decreased social support through social selection processes. Few studies, however, have examined the longitudinal and bidirectional associations between social support and PTS in a postdisaster context, and whether such associations vary by type of support (e.g., emotional, informational, or tangible). We examined these relationships using Galveston Bay Recovery Study data. Participants (N = 658) were interviewed 2–6 months (W1), 5–9 months (W2), and 14–19 months (W3) after Hurricane Ike in 2008. Longitudinal relationships between each support type and PTS were examined in cross‐lagged models. W1 emotional support was negatively associated with W2 PTS (Estimate = –.13, p = .007), consistent with social causation. W1 PTS was negatively associated with W2 emotional support (Estimate = –.14, p = .019), consistent with social selection. In contrast, pathways were nonsignificant at subsequent waves and for informational and tangible support. Results suggested that postdisaster social causation and selection were limited to emotional support and diminish over time. Based on these findings, postdisaster services should emphasize restoring supportive social connections to minimize the psychiatric consequences of disaster, especially among those with prior evidence of distress.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jts.22092

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Previous meta-analyses have evidenced a longitudinal relationship between social support and PTSD, and research has also shown a strong bi-directional association between social support and PTSD symptoms.

    “Although previous meta-analyses have evidenced a longitudinal relationship between social support and PTSD (Zalta et al., 2021), research has also shown a strong bi-directional association between social support and PTSD symptoms (e.g. Platt, Lowe, Galea, Norris, & Koenen, 2016).”

    From The association between social support and posttraumatic stress symptoms among survivors of betrayal trauma: a meta-analysis (2021) · cites this paper as Platt, Lowe, Galea, Norris, & Koenen, 2016

    The Abstract reports associations in both directions between emotional support and posttraumatic stress symptoms, and the Discussion describes evidence for both pathways. But the findings were limited to emotional support in the early postdisaster period; later pathways and those for informational and tangible support were nonsignificant. The source therefore does not establish the unqualified 'strong' bidirectional association described in the citing sentence. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 28

  1. Association American Psychiatric, 1994, Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders
  2. Brymer M., 2006, Psychological first aid field operations guide, National Child Traumatic Stress Network, 2, 81
  3. 10.1207/s15328007sem0902_5 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1002/jts.2490030406 · DOI
  5. 10.1007/BF02103669 · DOI
  6. 10.1007/s10802-007-9099-2 · DOI
  7. 10.1207/s15328007sem1004_1 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1080/10705519909540118 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Data Holdings ICPSR, 2010, American Community Survey (ACS): Three‐Year Public Use Microdata Sample (PUMS), 2005
  10. Joseph S., 1999, Post‐traumatic stress disorders: Concepts and therapy, 71
  11. 10.1007/bf00940837 · DOI
  12. 10.1007/bf02506964 · DOI
  13. 10.1023/A:1005192616058 · DOI
  14. 10.1017/CBO9780511730030.011 · DOI
  15. 10.1002/0470013192.bsa156 · DOI
  16. 10.1037/1040-3590.10.2.90 · DOI
  17. Little T. D., 2009, Longitudinal structural equation modeling
  18. 10.1037/a0018317 · DOI
  19. 10.1177/0265407514558958 · DOI
  20. 10.1198/000313007x171322 · DOI
  21. Muthe‘n L., 2013, Mplus: Statistical analysis with latent variables. User's guide
  22. 10.1007/s10464-005-6230-9 · DOI
  23. 10.1037/0022-3514.71.3.498 · DOI
  24. 10.1037/a0020195 · DOI
  25. 10.1061/(asce)nh.1527-6996.0000146 · DOI
  26. Raghunathan T. E., 2002, Ann Arbor, MI: Survey Methodology Program, Survey Research Center, Institute for Social Research
  27. 10.1080/01621459.2000.10474283 · DOI
  28. Williams R., 1999, Post‐traumatic stress disorders: Concepts and therapy, pp. 297‐314

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Platt, J. M., Lowe, S. R., Galea, S., Norris, F. H., & Koenen, K. C.
Affiliations
  • Columbia University (US)
  • Montclair State University (US)
  • Boston University (US)
  • Dartmouth College (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Platt, Jonathan M.
Venue
Journal of Traumatic Stress
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-05-10
Volume
29
Issue
3
Pages
205-213
ISSN
  • 0894-9867 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-6598
OpenAlex
W2380513115
Cited by
89
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 4
FWCI
7.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Traumatic Stress (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01mh093612-03)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01-MH093612, R21MH102570, R01MH101269, T32MH013043, R01MH101227)
  • Fogarty International Center (R21TW009915)
  • National Center for Research Resources (P51RR000165)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Resilience and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Disaster Management and Resilience
Keywords
social support, post-traumatic stress, Hurricane Ike, natural disasters, emotional support, information support, tangible support, social causation, social selection, bidirectional relationship, disaster recovery
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Disasters, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Risk Factors, Social Support, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Texas, Time Factors, Cyclonic Storms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review