Cited by 222Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchTraumatic Brain Injury ResearchMigration, Health and Trauma

Examining moderators of the relationship between social support and self-reported PTSD symptoms: A meta-analysis.

Open access
Zalta, Alyson K., Tirone, Vanessa, Orlowska, Daria, Blais, Rebecca K., Lofgreen, Ashton, Klassen, Brian, Held, Philip, Stevens, Natalie R. +2 more·2021·Psychological Bulletin

Abstract

Social support is one of the most robust predictors of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Yet, little is known about factors that moderate the relationship between social support and PTSD symptom severity. This meta-analysis estimated the overall effect size of the relationship between self-reported social support and PTSD severity and tested meaningful demographic, social support, and trauma characteristics that may moderate this association using both cross-sectional and longitudinal effect sizes. A comprehensive search identified 139 studies with 145 independent cross-sectional effect sizes representing 62,803 individuals and 37 studies with 38 independent longitudinal effect sizes representing 25,792 individuals. Study samples had to comprise trauma-exposed, nonclinical adult populations to be included in the analysis. Cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses revealed a near medium overall effect size (rcross = -.27; 95% CI [-.30, -.24]; rlong = -.25; 95% CI [-.28, -.21]) with a high degree of heterogeneity (cross-sectional I2 = 91.6, longitudinal I2 = 86.5). Both cross-sectional and longitudinal moderator analyses revealed that study samples exposed to natural disasters had a weaker effect size than samples exposed to other trauma types (e.g., combat, interpersonal violence), studies measuring negative social reactions had a larger effect size than studies assessing other types of social support, and veteran samples revealed larger effect sizes than civilian samples. Several other methodological and substantive moderators emerged that revealed a complex relationship between social support and PTSD severity. These findings have important clinical implications for the types of social support interventions that could mitigate PTSD severity. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/bul0000316

Cites

182 of 209 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Negative responses to disclosure of trauma were associated with more severe PTSD symptoms among survivors of betrayal trauma.

    “Negative responses to disclosure of trauma (e.g. blame, treating someone differently after disclosure) were associated with more severe PTSD symptoms, consistent with previous research (Dworkin et al., 2019; Zalta et al., 2021).”

    From The association between social support and posttraumatic stress symptoms among survivors of betrayal trauma: a meta-analysis (2021) · cites this paper as Zalta et al., 2021

    The Discussion reports that negative social reactions had the strongest association with PTSD severity, and that many measures assessed negative responses to trauma disclosure. The Introduction gives blame and treating a survivor differently as examples. The paper does not establish this association specifically among survivors of betrayal trauma, as the claim states. No page numbers were available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Social support has most commonly been assessed using global measures of perceived availability and satisfaction with social support.

    “Although one body of the trauma literature has focused on the types of supportive responses survivors receive after disclosing their trauma, particularly among interpersonal trauma survivors (Dworkin et al., 2019), social support has most commonly been assessed using global measures of perceived availability and satisfaction with social support (Zalta et al., 2021).”
  • Harmful effects of negative social reactions on psychopathology, including PTSD symptoms, are more impactful than the salubrious effects of positive forms of social support.

    “Several meta-analyses have shown that harmful effects of negative social reactions (e.g. blame, treating the person differently, social constraint, making demands) on psychopathology, including PTSD symptoms, are more impactful than the salubrious effects of positive forms of social support (Blais et al., 2021; Dworkin et al., 2019; Zalta et al., 2021).”
  • The overall effect was consistent with previous meta-analyses examining the relationship between social support and PTSD symptoms across all trauma types, which found an overall weighted cross-sectional effect size of −.27.

    “This overall effect was consistent with previous meta-analyses examining the relationship between social support and PTSD symptoms across all trauma types (overall weighted cross-sectional effect size of −.27 in Zalta et al., 2021).”
  • General positive support was associated with fewer PTSD symptoms among survivors of betrayal trauma.

    “General positive support was associated with fewer PTSD symptoms, consistent with previous meta-analytic findings that perceived social support, enacted support, and structural support were associated with fewer PTSD symptoms among a broad range of trauma survivors (Zalta et al., 2021).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 36

  1. * Abbas M (2018). Examining the dimensions of social support and warfare exposure as predictors of PTSD symptoms among National Guard service members over time (Doctoral Dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database (UMI No. 10933379).
  2. American Psychiatric Association (1980). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (3rd ed.). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing.
  3. American Psychiatric Association (2013). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (5th ed.). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing.
  4. * Barnes HA (2018). Support, meaning making, and trauma among Hurricane Katrina survivors of southern Mississippi: Investigating the relationship between social support, meaning making, and posttraumatic stress (Doctoral Dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database (UMI No. 10747385).
  5. * Berzengi A (2015). Investigating the relationship between religious coping, appraisals, social support, and symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD): A correlational study using an Islamic community sample (Doctoral thesis, University of East Anglia, Norwich, United Kingdom). Retrieved from https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/id/eprint/56833/
  6. * Bilić LL (2005). Posttraumatic growth following major trauma (Doctoral thesis, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom). Retrieved from https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.422100
  7. * Boul SJ (2015). From combat to classroom: An examination of combat trauma’s effects on military veteran’s relationships and adjustment to college (Doctoral Dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database (UMI No. 3745534).
  8. * Burnette S (1998). Posttraumatic stress disorder among firearm assault survivors: Risk and resiliency factors in recovery from violent victimization (Doctoral Dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database (UMI No. 9837559).
  9. * Cai W, Ding C, Tang Y, Wu S, & Yang D (2014). Effects of social supports on posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms: Moderating role of perceived safety. Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy, 6, 724– 730. 10.1037/a0036342 · DOI
  10. Cohen S (1992). Stress, social support, and disorder. In Veiel HOF & Baumann U (Eds.) The Meaning and Measurement of Social Support (p. 109– 124). New York, NY: Hemisphere Press.
  11. * Day MA (2018). The Role of social support during post-deployment reintegration in the army national guard (Doctoral Dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database (UMI No. 10684084).
  12. * Dempsey CL (2001). Post-traumatic stress disorder symptomatology among American Indian Vietnam veterans: Mediators and moderators of the stress-illness relationship (Doctoral Dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database (UMI No. 3021498).
  13. * Dryden AE (2012). The effects of combat exposure on post-deployment coping deficits in OEF/OIF/OND veterans (Doctoral Dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database (UMI No. 3529752).
  14. * Fazzari DA (2008). Social networks in a sample of high exposure World Trade Center survivors: Integration, constraints, and development antecedents (Doctoral Dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database (UMI No. 3305219).
  15. Foa EB, Cashman L, Jaycox L, & Perry K (1997). The validation of a self-report measure of posttraumatic stress disorder: The Posttraumatic Stress Diagnostic Scale. Psychological Assessment, 9, 445– 451. 10.1037//1040-3590.9.4.445 · DOI · Paper page
  16. * Hoover S (2005). Posttraumatic growth: Assessing stress -related growth in early remission breast cancer survivors (Doctoral Dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database (UMI No. 3191654).
  17. * Hoyt T, & Renshaw KD (2014). Emotional disclosure and posttraumatic stress symptoms: Veteran and spouse reports. International Journal of Stress Management, 21, 186– 206. 10.1037/a0035162 · DOI
  18. * Jadanova A (2018). Healing after trauma: A study of dynamic factors that maintain post-traumatic stress disorder (Doctoral Dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database (UMI No. 10984220).
  19. * Leiderman-Cerniglia LJ (2001). Psychological factors associated with resistance to PTSD symptoms in women with breast cancer (Doctoral Dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database (UMI No. 3030506).
  20. * Lhewa DW (2010). Coping and distress among Tibetan survivors of torture and refugee trauma (Doctoral Dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database (UMI No. 3382530).
  21. * Mendoza MA (2015). Predictors of posttraumatic growth among combat veterans (Doctoral Dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database (UMI No. 3664484).
  22. Monson CM, & Fredman SJ (2012). Cognitive-behavioral conjoint therapy for posttraumatic stress disorder: Therapist’s manual. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  23. * Port CL, Engdahl B, Frazier P, & Eberly R (2002). Factors related to the long-term course of PTSD in older ex-prisoners of war. Journal of Clinical Geropsychology, 8, 203– 214. 10.1023/A:1015996211452 · DOI
  24. * Pruneau GMC (2010). Relationships among adult attachment, social support, and PTSD symptoms in trauma-exposed college students (Doctoral Dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database (UMI No. 3446187).
  25. * Rivet MA (2012) An online investigation of the experiences of stress and prevalence of posttraumatic stress disorder for female armed service personnel returning from Iraq and Afghanistan: Understanding their needs and implications for intervention (Doctoral Dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database (UMI No. 3494838).
  26. * Roper KD (1999). Posttraumatic stress disorder in women breast cancer survivors treated with high-dose chemotherapy and autologous hematopoietic progenitor stem cell transplant (Doctoral Dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database (UMI No. 9942412).
  27. * Shaine MJD (2016). Exploring on-campus peer social support as a mediator between attachment and posttraumatic stress in military and veteran students (Doctoral Dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database (UMI No. 10096687).
  28. * Shallcross SL (2013). Social support mediates the relation between attachment and responses to potentially traumatic events (Doctoral Dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database (UMI No. 3600956).
  29. * Sharp M (2018). Social reactions to disclosure of traumatic childbirth experiences: associations with coping, posttraumatic cognitions, and traumatic stress and depressive symptomology (Doctoral Dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database (UMI No. 10970541).
  30. Solomon Z, Ginzburg K, Mikulincer M, Neria Y, & Ohry A (1998). Coping with war captivity: The role of attachment style. European Journal of Personality, 12, 271– 285. 10.1002/(sici)1099-0984(199807/08)12:4<271::aid-per309>3.0.co;2-u · DOI
  31. * Tackett DP (2011). Resilience factors affecting the readjustment of national guard soldiers returning from deployment (Doctoral Dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database (UMI No. 10807633).
  32. * Thompson RN (1999). Prediction of trauma responses following myocardial infarction (Doctoral Dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database (UMI No. 9926713).
  33. * Weber DJ (2012). Academic success and well-being following OEF/OIF deployment (Doctoral Dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database (UMI No. 3495315).
  34. Weiss DS, & Marmar CR (1996). The Impact of Event Scale - Revised. In Wilson J & Keane TM (Eds.), Assessing Psychological Trauma and PTSD (pp. 399– 411). New York: Guilford.
  35. * Whalen RJ (2011). Individual- and unit-level coping among combat veterans subject to army force stabilization system personnel policy (Doctoral Dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database (UMI No. 3469106).
  36. * Woods D (2004). Mental health and well-being of Somalis in the United Kingdom (Doctoral thesis, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom). Retrieved from http://etheses.whiterose.ac.uk/4210/

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zalta, A. K., Tirone, V., Orlowska, D., Blais, R. K., Lofgreen, A., Klassen, B., Held, P., Stevens, N. R., Adkins, E., & Dent, A. L.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Irvine (US)
  • Rush University Medical Center (US)
  • Western Michigan University (US)
  • Northwestern University (US)
Venue
Psychological Bulletin
Published
2021-01
Volume
147
Issue
1
Pages
33-54
ISSN
  • 0033-2909 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1455
OpenAlex
W3109357377
Cited by
222
References
182
Citations by year
2026: 43 · 2025: 55 · 2024: 43 · 2023: 40 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 12 · 2019: 1
FWCI
8.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychological Bulletin (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health ((K23 MH103394)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Migration, Health and Trauma
Keywords
social support, post-traumatic stress disorder, PTSD symptom severity, moderators, natural disasters, war injuries, interpersonal violence, veterans, trauma exposure, social support interventions
MeSH terms
Adult, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Severity of Illness Index, Social Support, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Wounds and Injuries, Effect Modifier, Epidemiologic, Self Report

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review