Cited by 77Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchOccupational Health and PerformanceSubstance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes

Posttraumatic stress symptoms and alcohol-related outcomes among municipal firefighters

Tomaka, Joe, Magoc, Dejan, Morales‐Monks, Stormy M., Reyes, Anabel C.·2017·Journal of Traumatic Stress

Abstract

This study examined levels of posttraumatic stress symptoms (PTSS) and relationships between PTSS and alcohol-related outcomes in a near census of municipal firefighters. The study also assessed substance-use coping and drinking to cope as potential mediators of such outcomes. Firefighters (N = 740) completed measures that assessed PTSS, alcohol risk behaviors, alcohol problems, drinking motives, and coping with stress. Results showed that 32.4% of firefighters reported significant levels of PTSS using National Center for PTSD (2014) screening cutoff scores. Correlational analysis showed that PTSS was related to at-risk drinking (r = .18) and alcohol-related problems (r = .33), as well as use of maladaptive coping strategies (r = .58) and substance use coping (r = .40). Structural analyses comparing multiple alternative models suggested that a model that included substance use coping and drinking to cope as mediators of the association between PTSS and problem drinking provided the best fit to the data. Tests of multigroup invariance confirmed this model. Overall, PTSS were common in this population and they predicted maladaptive coping patterns and alcohol-related consequences. One implication of these findings is that fire departments might consider adding or enhancing screening and treatment options for PTS, alcohol misuse, or both.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jts.22203

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 32 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tomaka, J., Magoc, D., Morales‐Monks, S. M., & Reyes, A. C.
Affiliations
  • New Mexico State University (US)
  • Stetson University (US)
  • Texas Tech University (US)
  • The University of Texas at El Paso (US)
Corresponding author
Tomaka, Joe
Venue
Journal of Traumatic Stress
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-07-12
Volume
30
Issue
4
Pages
416-424
ISSN
  • 0894-9867 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-6598
OpenAlex
W2735210356
Cited by
77
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5
FWCI
7.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Traumatic Stress (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Health and Performance
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
Keywords
posttraumatic stress symptoms, firefighters, alcohol-related problems, hazardous drinking, drinking to cope, substance use coping, maladaptive coping, drinking motives, occupational injuries, mediation, screening and treatment
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Cities, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Surveys and Questionnaires, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Southwestern United States, Models, Statistical, Diagnosis, Dual (Psychiatry), Alcohol-Related Disorders, Firefighters

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review