Cited by 48Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesOccupational Health and Performance

Posttraumatic stress, alcohol use, and alcohol use motives among firefighters: The role of distress tolerance

Zegel, Maya, Tran, Jana K., Vujanovic, Anka A.·2019·Psychiatry Research

Abstract

Firefighters represent a unique, vulnerable population at high risk for alcohol use disorder (AUD) and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptomatology due to the high rates of occupational exposure to traumatic events. To inform specialized alcohol use interventions for firefighters, it is important to understand relevant malleable cognitive-affective factors related to PTSD and AUD symptoms. Distress tolerance (DT), defined as the perceived ability to withstand negative emotional states, is one promising factor relevant to this domain. The current study examined the moderating role of DT in the association of PTSD symptom severity with alcohol use severity and alcohol use motives. Participants included 652 trauma-exposed firefighters (93.3% male; M age = 38.7 years, SD = 8.6) who endorsed lifetime (ever) alcohol use. Results indicated that there was a significant interactive effect of PTSD symptom severity and DT on coping-oriented alcohol use motives but not other alcohol-related outcomes. These findings were evident after adjusting for alcohol consumption, romantic relationship status, number of years in the fire service, occupational stress, and trauma load. This is the first study to concurrently examine these variables among firefighters and this line of inquiry has great potential to inform intervention efforts for this vulnerable, understudied population.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.psychres.2019.112633

Cites

68 of 68 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zegel, M., Tran, J. K., & Vujanovic, A. A.
Affiliations
University of Houston (US)
Corresponding author
Vujanovic, Anka A.
Venue
Psychiatry Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-12
Volume
282
Pages
112633
ISSN
0165-1781 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2987357206
Cited by
48
References
67
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 3
FWCI
5.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychiatry Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Health and Performance
Keywords
post-traumatic stress disorder, alcohol consumption, drinking motives, distress tolerance, firefighters, occupational trauma exposure, alcoholism, moderating effect
MeSH terms
Occupational Stress, Psychological Distress, Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Alcohol Drinking, Alcoholism, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Motivation, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Young Adult, Firefighters

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review