Cited by 13Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchSexual Assault and Victimization StudiesChild Abuse and Trauma

Cognitive Processing Therapy for Substance‐Involved Sexual Assault: Does an Account Help or Hinder Recovery?

Open access
Jaffe, Anna E., Kaysen, Debra, Smith, Brian N., Galovski, Tara, Resick, Patricia A.·2021·Journal of Traumatic Stress

Abstract

Sexual assault (SA) often occurs in the context of substances, which can impair the trauma memory and contribute to negative cognitions like self‐blame. Although these factors may affect posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) treatment, outcomes for substance‐involved SA have not been evaluated or compared with other types of SA. As such, we conducted a secondary analysis of a dismantling trial for cognitive processing therapy (CPT), focusing on 58 women with an index trauma of SA that occurred since age 14. Women who experienced a substance‐involved SA (n = 21) were compared with those who experienced a non–substance‐involved SA (n = 37). Participants were randomized to CPT, CPT with written account (CPT+A), or written account only (WA). Regressions controlling for pretreatment symptom levels revealed no differences by SA type in PTSD severity at posttreatment. At 6‐month follow‐up, substance‐involved SA was associated with more severe residual PTSD severity than non–substance‐involved SA, with no significant differences by treatment condition. Among participants in the substance‐involved SA group, the largest effect for reduced PTSD symptom severity from pretreatment to follow‐up emerged in the CPT condition, d = −2.02, with reductions also observed in the CPT+A, d = −0.92, and WA groups, d = −1.23. Although more research in larger samples is needed, these preliminary findings suggest that following substance‐involved SA, a cognitive treatment approach without a trauma account may facilitate lasting change in PTSD symptoms. We encourage replications to better understand the relative value of cognitive and exposure‐based treatment for PTSD following substance‐involved SAs.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jts.22674

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • At 6-month follow-up post-treatment, both DFSA-I and DFSA-V were associated with more severe residual PTSD severity than NDFSA.

    “Treatment studies similarly demonstrate that at 6-month follow-up post-treatment, both DFSA-I and DFSA-V were associated with more severe residual PTSD severity than NDFSA (Jaffe, Kaysen, Smith, Galovski, & Resick, 2021; Russell & Curran, 2002).”

    From Drug-facilitated sexual assault, impaired trauma memory, and implications for mental health treatment (2022) · cites this paper as Jaffe, Kaysen, Smith, Galovski, & Resick, 2021

    The Results (Differential Treatment Efficacy; page unavailable) report higher PTSD severity at six months for the substance-involved group than for the non–substance-involved group. But the Methods (Measures; page unavailable) classify assaults only by whether the participant was under the influence; the paper does not report separate six-month findings for DFSA-I and DFSA-V. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Jaffe et al. (2021) still found more severe residual PTSD at post-treatment follow-up for DFSA survivors receiving the cognitive-only component.

    “However, they still found more severe residual PTSD at post-treatment follow-up for DFSA survivors receiving the cognitive-only component.”

    From Drug-facilitated sexual assault, impaired trauma memory, and implications for mental health treatment (2022) · cites this paper as Jaffe et al., 2021

    The Results (Differential Treatment Efficacy; page unavailable) report higher residual PTSD severity at six-month follow-up after substance-involved than non–substance-involved sexual assault. They do not establish that this finding was specific to survivors receiving cognitive-only CPT: the difference did not significantly vary by treatment condition. The paper also studies substance-involved assault, not a separately identified DFSA group. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Jaffe et al. (2021) identified better outcomes for DFSA survivors receiving cognitive processing therapy when they did not include the written account component, in order to curtail the risk of increased rumination in attempting to focus on recalling memories.

    “Indeed, Jaffe et al. (2021) identified better outcomes for DFSA survivors receiving cognitive processing therapy when they did not include the written account component, in order to curtail the risk of increased rumination in attempting to focus on recalling memories.”

    From Drug-facilitated sexual assault, impaired trauma memory, and implications for mental health treatment (2022) · cites this paper as Jaffe et al., 2021

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 22

  1. Abbey A, Clinton AM, McAuslan P, Zawacki T, & Buck PO (2002). Alcohol-involved rapes: Are they more violent? Psychology of Women Quarterly, 26(2), 99– 109. 10.1111/1471-6402.00048 26257465 PMC4527173 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Blake DD, Weathers FW, Nagy LM, Kaloupek DG, Gusman FD, Charney DS, & Keane TM (1995). The development of a Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 8(1), 75– 90. 10.1002/jts.2490080106 7712061 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Clum GA, Nishith P, & Calhoun KS (2002). A preliminary investigation of alcohol use during trauma and peritraumatic reactions in female sexual assault victims. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 15(4), 321– 328. 10.1023/A:1016255929315 12224804 · DOI
  4. Galovski TE, Nixon RDV, & Kaysen D. (2020). Flexible applications of cognitive processing therapy: Evidence-based treatment methods. Elsevier.
  5. Gauntlett-Gilbert J, Keegan A, & Petrak J. (2004). Drug-facilitated sexual assault: Cognitive approaches to treating the trauma. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 32(2), 215– 223. 10.1017/S1352465804001481 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Gong AT, Kamboj SK, & Curran HV (2019). Post-traumatic stress disorder in victims of sexual assault with pre-assault substance consumption: A systematic review. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 10, 92. 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00092 30918487 PMC6424881 · DOI · Paper page
  7. International Society for Traumatic Stress Studies (ISTSS). (2019). ISTSS PTSD prevention and treatment guidelines: Methodology and recommendations. https://istss.org/clinical-resources/treating-trauma/new-istss-prevention-and-treatment-guidelines 31283056
  8. Kaysen D, Neighbors C, Martell J, Fossos N, & Larimer ME (2006). Incapacitated rape and alcohol use: A prospective analysis. Addictive Behaviors, 31(10), 1820– 1832. 10.1016/j.addbeh.2005.12.025 16446044 PMC1893005 · DOI
  9. Koss MP, Abbey A, Campbell R, Cook S, Norris J, Testa M, Ullman S, West C, & White J. (2007). Revising the SES: A collaborative process to improve assessment of sexual aggression and victimization. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 31(4), 357– 370. 10.1111/j.1471-6402.2007.00385.x · DOI · Paper page
  10. Littleton H, Grills-Taquechel A, & Axsom D. (2009). Impaired and incapacitated rape victims: Assault characteristics and post-assault experiences. Violence and Victims, 24(4), 439– 457. 10.1891/0886-6708.24.4.439 19694350 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Lorenz K, & Ullman SE (2016). Alcohol and sexual assault victimization: Research findings and future directions. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 31, 82– 94. 10.1016/j.avb.2016.08.001 · DOI
  12. Morris SB (2008). Estimating effect sizes from pretest–posttest–control group designs. Organizational Research Methods, 11(2), 364– 386. 10.1177/1094428106291059 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Muthén LK, & Muthén BO (2015). Mplus user’s guide (7th ed.). https://www.statmodel.com/download/usersguide/MplusUserGuideVer_7.pdf
  14. Padmanabhanunni A, & Edwards D. (2013). Treating the psychological sequelae of proactive drug-facilitated sexual assault: Knowledge building through systematic case-based research. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 41(3), 371– 375. 10.1017/S1352465812000896 23228526 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Peter-Hagene LC, & Ullman SE (2018). Longitudinal effects of sexual assault victims’ drinking and self-blame on posttraumatic stress disorder. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 33(1), 83– 93. 10.1177/0886260516636394 PMC5014733 26956436 · DOI
  16. Resick PA, Galovski TE, Uhlmansiek MO, Scher CD, Clum GA, & Young-Xu Y. (2008). A randomized clinical trial to dismantle components of cognitive processing therapy for posttraumatic stress disorder in female victims of interpersonal violence. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 76(2), 243– 258. 10.1037/0022-006X.76.2.243 18377121 PMC2967760 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Resick PA, Jordan CG, Girelli SA, Hutter CK, & Marhoeder- Dvorak S. (1988). A comparative outcome study of behavioral group therapy for sexual assault victims. Behavior Therapy, 19(3), 385– 401. 10.1016/S0005-7894(88)80011-X · DOI
  18. Resick PA, & Schnicke MK (1993). Cognitive processing therapy for rape victims: A treatment manual. Sage. 1401390
  19. Walsh K, Zinzow HM, Badour CL, Ruggiero KJ, Kilpatrick DG, & Resnick HS (2016). Understanding disparities in service seeking following forcible versus drug- or alcohol-facilitated/incapacitated rape. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 31(14), 2475– 2491. 10.1177/0886260515576968 25846758 PMC4593716 · DOI
  20. Weathers FW, Keane TM, & Davidson JR (2001). Clinician‐Administered PTSD Scale: A review of the first ten years of research. Depression and Anxiety, 13(3), 132– 156. 10.1002/da.1029 11387733 · DOI
  21. White AM (2003). What happened? Alcohol, memory blackouts, and the brain. Alcohol Research & Health, 27(2), 186– 196. 15303630 PMC6668891
  22. Wolitzky-Taylor KB, Resnick HS, Amstadter AB, McCauley JL, Ruggiero KJ, & Kilpatrick DG (2011). Reporting rape in a national sample of college women. Journal of American College Health, 59(7), 582– 587. 10.1080/07448481.2010.515634 21823952 PMC3211043 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jaffe, A. E., Kaysen, D., Smith, B. N., Galovski, T., & Resick, P. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Nebraska–Lincoln (US)
  • Stanford Medicine (US)
  • Boston University (US)
  • Duke University (US)
Corresponding author
Jaffe, Anna E.
Venue
Journal of Traumatic Stress
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2021-04-05
Volume
34
Issue
4
Pages
864-871
ISSN
  • 0894-9867 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-6598
OpenAlex
W3139853079
Cited by
13
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5
FWCI
1.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Traumatic Stress (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (T32AA007455, R01AA020252)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH51509)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
Keywords
cognitive processing therapy, post-traumatic stress disorder, women survivors, traumatic memory, self-blame, PTSD treatment outcomes, exposure therapy
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Cognition, Female, Humans, Sex Offenses, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review