Cited by 319Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchPsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research

Psychotherapies for PTSD: what do they have in common?

Open access
Schnyder, Ulrich, Ehlers, Anke, Elbert, Thomas, Foa, Edna B., Gersons, Berthold P. R., Resick, Patricia A., Shapiro, Francine, Cloitre, Marylène·2015·European Journal of Psychotraumatology

Abstract

Over the past three decades, research and clinical practice related to the field of traumatic stress have developed tremendously. In parallel with the steady accumulation of basic knowledge, therapeutic approaches have been developed to treat people suffering from posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and other trauma-related psychological problems. Today, a number of evidence-based treatments are available. They differ in various ways; however, they also have a number of commonalities. Given this situation, clinicians may wonder which treatment program to use, or more specifically, which treatment components are critical for a successful therapy. In this article, seven pioneers who have developed empirically supported psychotherapies for trauma-related disorders were asked to compose an essay of three parts: first, to provide a brief summary of the treatment they have developed; second, to identify three key interventions that are common and critical in treating PTSD; and third, to suggest important topics and future directions for research. The paper ends with a summary highlighting the identified commonalities (psychoeducation; emotion regulation and coping skills; imaginal exposure; cognitive processing, restructuring, and/or meaning making; emotions; and memory processes), pointing to future directions such as trying to better understand the underlying mechanisms of action, and developing treatments that are tailored to the needs of different patient groups.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3402/ejpt.v6.28186

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schnyder, U., Ehlers, A., Elbert, T., Foa, E. B., Gersons, B. P. R., Resick, P. A., Shapiro, F., & Cloitre, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Zurich (CH)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • University of Konstanz (DE)
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam (NL)
  • Duke University (US)
  • Mental Research Institute (US)
  • National Center for PTSD—Dissemination & Training Division, VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA, USA
Corresponding author
Schnyder, Ulrich
Venue
European Journal of Psychotraumatology
Published
2015-08-14
Volume
6
Issue
1
Pages
28186-28186
ISSN
2000-8066 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1755198206
Cited by
319
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 39 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 46 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 1
FWCI
31.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Journal of Psychotraumatology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • KOPS (University of Konstanz) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
  • Figshare (cc-by)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust (069777)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH086611)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Keywords
post-traumatic stress disorder, trauma-focused psychotherapy, empirically supported treatments, psychoeducation, emotion regulation, coping strategies, imaginal exposure, cognitive processes, meaning-making, memory processes, mechanism of action, treatment tailoring, trauma-related disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review