Cited by 58Prenatal Screening and DiagnosticsMaternal and Perinatal Health InterventionsUltrasound in Clinical Applications

Accuracy of the Ultrasound Estimate of the Amniotic Fluid Volume (Amniotic Fluid Index and Single Deepest Pocket) to Identify Actual Low, Normal, and High Amniotic Fluid Volumes as Determined by Quantile Regression

Hughes, Dawn S., Magann, Everett F., Whittington, Julie R., Wendel, Michael P., Sandlin, Adam T., Ounpraseuth, Songthip T.·2020·Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine

Abstract

Objectives: To identify abnormal amniotic fluid volumes (AFVs), normal volumes must be determined. Multiple statistical methods are used to define normal amniotic fluid curves; however, quantile regression (QR) is gaining favor. We reanalyzed ultrasound estimates in identifying oligohydramnios, normal fluid, and polyhydramnios using normal volumes calculated by QR. Methods: Data from 506 dye‐determined or directly measured AFVs along with ultrasound estimates were analyzed. Each was classified as low, normal, or high for both the single deepest pocket (SDP) and amniotic fluid index (AFI). A weighted κ statistic was used to assess the level of agreement between the AFI and SDP compared to actual AFVs by QR. Results: The overall level of agreement for the AFI was fair (κ = 0.26), and that for the SDP was slight (κ = 0.19). Although not statistically significant (P = .792), the positive predictive value to classify a low volume using the AFI was lower compared to the SDP (35% vs 43%). The positive predictive value for a high volume was higher using the AFI compared to the SDP (55% versus 31%) but not statistically significant. The missed‐call rate for high‐volume identification by the SDP versus AFI was statistically significant (odds ratio, 5.5; 95% confidence interval, 2.04–14.97). The missed‐call rate for low‐volume identification by the AFI versus SDP was not statistically significant (odds ratio, 3.3; 95% confidence interval, 0.96–11.53). Conclusions: Both the AFI and SDP identify actual normal AFVs by QR, with sensitivity higher than 90%. The SDP is superior for identification of oligohydramnios, and the AFI superior for identification of polyhydramnios.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jum.15116

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Observational evidence comparing ultrasound with dye-determination of amniotic fluid volume has shown that deepest vertical pocket may be superior for identifying oligohydramnios and amniotic fluid index superior for identifying polyhydramnios.

    “Observational evidence comparing ultrasound with dye-determination of amniotic fluid volume has shown that DVP may be superior for identifying oligohydramnios and the AFI superior for identifying polyhydramnios 39 .”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hughes, D. S., Magann, E. F., Whittington, J. R., Wendel, M. P., Sandlin, A. T., & Ounpraseuth, S. T.
Affiliations
University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences (US)
Corresponding author
Magann, Everett F.
Venue
Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-08-18
Volume
39
Issue
2
Pages
373-378
ISSN
  • 0278-4297 (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-9613
OpenAlex
W2968956710
Cited by
58
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2
FWCI
4.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine › Ultrasound in Clinical Applications
Keywords
amniotic fluid volume, amniotic fluid index, oligohydramnios, polyhydramnios, quantile regression, reference values, diagnostic accuracy, prenatal ultrasound
MeSH terms
Adult, Amniotic Fluid, Female, Humans, Polyhydramnios, Predictive Value of Tests, Pregnancy, Reference Values, Retrospective Studies, Oligohydramnios, Ultrasonography, Prenatal

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review