The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Active demultiplexing of single photons from a solid‐state source
Abstract
A scheme for active temporal‐to‐spatial demultiplexing of single photons generated by a solid‐state source is introduced. The scheme scales quasi‐polynomially with photon number, providing a viable technological path for routing n photons in the one temporal stream from a single emitter to n different spatial modes. Active demultiplexing is demonstrated using a state‐of‐the‐art photon source—a quantum‐dot deterministically coupled to a micropillar cavity—and a custom‐built demultiplexer—a network of electro‐optically reconfigurable waveguides monolithically integrated in a lithium niobate chip. The measured demultiplexer performance can enable a six‐photon rate three orders of magnitude higher than the equivalent heralded SPDC source, providing a platform for intermediate quantum computation protocols.image
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“To date the highest number of photons generated in a Boson sampling experiment have been through the demultiplexing of a single QD-SPS [57-59]: Fig.5b .”
From Integrated photonic quantum technologies (2020) · cites this paper as [59]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The computational complexity of linear optics
Aaronson, S., & Arkhipov, A. (2011) · Proceedings of the forty-third annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing · doi:10.1145/1993636.1993682 · Cited by 874
Research works printed but not linked: 19
- 10.1080/09500340802337374 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.83.043814 · DOI
- Collins M., 2013, Nat. Comms, 4
- 10.1364/OPTICA.2.001010 · DOI
- Xiong C., 2016, Nat. Comms, 7
- 10.1002/lpor.201400027 · DOI
- 10.1364/OPTICA.3.000127 · DOI
- 10.1038/nphoton.2016.23 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.020401 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1364/OPTICA.3.000433 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.213601 · DOI
- 10.1364/OE.23.001748 · DOI
- 10.1063/1.1662743 · DOI
- J. C.Loredo M. A.Broome P.Hilaire O.Gazzano I.Sagnes A.Lemaitre M. P.Almeida P.Senellart andA. G.White arXiV:1603.00054(2016). · arXiv
- 10.1038/ncomms2434 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1063/1.4949508 · DOI
- 10.1098/rspa.2011.0232 · DOI
- 10.1038/nphoton.2015.153 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1088/1367-2630/18/11/113008 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Integrated photonic quantum technologies
Wang, J., Sciarrino, F., Laing, A., & Thompson, M. G. (2020) · Nature Photonics · doi:10.1038/s41566-019-0532-1 · Cited by 1,576
Photonic quantum information processing: a concise review
Slussarenko, S., & Pryde, G. J. (2019) · Applied Physics Reviews · doi:10.1063/1.5115814 · Cited by 644
Hybrid integration methods for on-chip quantum photonics
Kim, J.-H., Aghaeimeibodi, S., Carolan, J., Englund, D., & Waks, E. (2020) · Optica · doi:10.1364/optica.384118 · Cited by 272
Single-photon sources: approaching the ideal through multiplexing
Meyer-Scott, E., Silberhorn, C., & Migdall, A. (2020) · Review of Scientific Instruments · doi:10.1063/5.0003320 · Cited by 204
Integrated photonic platform for quantum information with continuous variables
Lenzini, F., Janousek, J., Thearle, O., Villa, M., Haylock, B., Kasture, S., Cui, L., Phan, H.-P., Dao, D. V., Yonezawa, H., et al. (2018) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.aat9331 · Cited by 159
Self-citationPhotonic implementation of boson sampling: a review
Brod, D. J., Galvão, E. F., Crespi, A., Osellame, R., Spagnolo, N., & Sciarrino, F. (2019) · Advanced Photonics · doi:10.1117/1.ap.1.3.034001 · Cited by 159
Nonlinear integrated quantum electro-optic circuits
Luo, K.-H., Brauner, S., Eigner, C., Sharapova, P. R., Ricken, R., Meier, T., Herrmann, H., & Silberhorn, C. (2019) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.aat1451 · Cited by 98
Metadata
- Authors
- Lenzini, F., Haylock, B., Loredo, J. C., Abrahão, R. A., Zakaria, N. A., Kasture, S., Sagnes, I., Lemaitre, A., Phan, H., Dao, D. V., Senellart, P., Almeida, M. P., White, A. G., & Lobino, M.
- Affiliations
- Centre for Quantum Dynamics Griffith University Brisbane Australia
- Centre for Engineered Quantum Systems, Centre for Quantum Computer and Communication Technology, School of Mathematics and Physics University of Queensland Brisbane Queensland 4072 Australia
- CNRS‐C2N Centre de Nanosciences et de Nanotechnologies Université Paris‐Saclay 91460 Marcoussis France
- Queensland Micro and Nanotechnology Centre Griffith University Brisbane Australia
- Venue
- Laser & Photonics Reviews
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2017-04-11
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 3
- ISSN
- 1863-8880
- 1863-8899
- Cited by
- 66
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
- Licence
- Funders
- Australian Research Council (DP140100808, DE120101899)
- European Research Council (277885 QD‐CQED)
- Agence Nationale de la Recherche
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
