On-Demand Single Photons with High Extraction Efficiency and Near-Unity Indistinguishability from a Resonantly Driven Quantum Dot in a Micropillar
Open accessAbstract
Scalable photonic quantum technologies require on-demand single-photon sources with simultaneously high levels of purity, indistinguishability, and efficiency. These key features, however, have only been demonstrated separately in previous experiments. Here, by s-shell pulsed resonant excitation of a Purcell-enhanced quantum dot-micropillar system, we deterministically generate resonance fluorescence single photons which, at π pulse excitation, have an extraction efficiency of 66%, single-photon purity of 99.1%, and photon indistinguishability of 98.5%. Such a single-photon source for the first time combines the features of high efficiency and near-perfect levels of purity and indistinguishabilty, and thus opens the way to multiphoton experiments with semiconductor quantum dots.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
By pulsed s-shell resonant excitation of a Purcell-enhanced InAs/GaAs quantum dot in a micropillar, the authors generate on-demand resonance-fluorescence single photons at π pulse with 66% extraction efficiency, 99.1% purity, and 98.5% indistinguishability. They argue this combines high efficiency with near-perfect purity and indistinguishability, opening a path to scalable multiphoton experiments with semiconductor quantum dots.
Key findings
- At π pulse excitation (24 nW, 81 MHz repetition rate), the source gives a count rate of 3.7 × 10⁶/s on a silicon single-photon detector, an overall system efficiency of 4.6%, and an estimated extraction efficiency of ∼66% into the first objective lens (NA = 0.68).
- Single-photon purity is reported as g²(0) = 0.009(1) [abstract also states 0.009(2)], corresponding to 99.1% purity; the signal-to-background ratio is 40:1.
- Two-photon Hong-Ou-Mandel interference gives raw/corrected visibilities of 96.4(3)% / 98.5(4)% at a 2.1 ns delay and 95.9(3)% / 97.8(4)% at a 12.4 ns delay; the abstract reports 98.5% indistinguishability.
- The micropillar cavity has a measured Purcell factor of 6.3(4), with the shortest RF lifetime 83.9 ps at 7.8 K; the homogeneous linewidth is 1.91(7) GHz, close to the lifetime-limited 1.89 GHz.
Methods
- A single self-assembled InAs/GaAs quantum dot embedded in a 2.5 μm diameter micropillar with 25.5 lower and 15 upper λ/4 AlAs/GaAs distributed Bragg reflectors, cooled in a cryogen-free bath cryostat tunable from 4.2 to 30 K.
- Pulsed s-shell resonant excitation used a Ti:sapphire laser producing ∼3 ps pulses at 897.44 nm, filtered by a 45 GHz etalon, with cross-polarization confocal suppression of laser background exceeding 10⁷.
- Characterization included microphotoluminescence, time-resolved resonance fluorescence, Hanbury Brown–Twiss measurement for g²(0), and Hong-Ou-Mandel interference at 2.1 ns and 12.4 ns delays, with corrections for detection and optical-path efficiencies.
Limitations
- Stated: the overall system efficiency remains 4.6% and extraction efficiency 66%; the authors say these can be improved using orthogonal excitation/detection, near-unity-efficiency superconducting nanowire single-photon detection, antireflection coatings, and optimized microcavity fabrication for higher Purcell factor.
- Stated: the inhomogeneous Gaussian linewidth of 1.14(9) GHz is attributed to spectral diffusion from charge fluctuations near the QD, and the extraction-efficiency estimate assumes perfect internal quantum efficiency of the QD.
- Evident: the demonstration is a single cryogenic QD-micropillar device; scaling to multiphoton experiments would require time-bin encoding, demultiplexing, or similar approaches not demonstrated here, and the corrected indistinguishability values depend on correction for residual multiphoton probability.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 32 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingown data§ On-Demand Single Photons with High Extraction Efficiency and Near-Unity Indistinguishability from a Resonantly Driven Quantum Dot in a Micropillar
At π pulse excitation, the generated single photons have a photon indistinguishability of 98.5%.
“have an extraction efficiency of 66%, single-photon purity of 99.1%, and photon indistinguishability of 98.5%.”
- Also stated in: § 020401-3 · plain
“we obtained the corrected degrees of indistinguishability to be 0.985 (4).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § 020401-3 · plain
- Findingown data§ On-Demand Single Photons with High Extraction Efficiency and Near-Unity Indistinguishability from a Resonantly Driven Quantum Dot in a Micropillar
Pulsed s-shell resonant excitation of a Purcell-enhanced quantum dot-micropillar system deterministically generates resonance fluorescence single photons.
“Here, by s-shell pulsed resonant excitation of a Purcellenhanced quantum dot-micropillar system, we deterministically generate resonance fluorescence single photons”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ On-Demand Single Photons with High Extraction Efficiency and Near-Unity Indistinguishability from a Resonantly Driven Quantum Dot in a Micropillar
At π pulse excitation, the generated single photons have an extraction efficiency of 66%.
“have an extraction efficiency of 66%, single-photon purity of 99.1%, and photon indistinguishability of 98.5%.”
- Also stated in: § On-Demand Single Photons with High Extraction Efficiency and Near-Unity Indistinguishability from a Resonantly Driven Quantum Dot in a Micropillar · hedged
“we estimate that 66% of the generated single photons are collected into the first objective lens (NA ¼ 0.68).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The internal quantum efficiency of the QD is perfect.
- Also stated in: § On-Demand Single Photons with High Extraction Efficiency and Near-Unity Indistinguishability from a Resonantly Driven Quantum Dot in a Micropillar · hedged
- Findingown data§ On-Demand Single Photons with High Extraction Efficiency and Near-Unity Indistinguishability from a Resonantly Driven Quantum Dot in a Micropillar
At π pulse excitation, the generated single photons have a single-photon purity of 99.1%.
“have an extraction efficiency of 66%, single-photon purity of 99.1%, and photon indistinguishability of 98.5%.”
- Also stated in: § 020401-3 · plain
“singlephoton purity of 99.1%”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § 020401-3 · plain
- Findingreasoning§ On-Demand Single Photons with High Extraction Efficiency and Near-Unity Indistinguishability from a Resonantly Driven Quantum Dot in a Micropillar
After correcting for calibrated losses and assuming perfect internal quantum efficiency, 66% of generated single photons are collected into the first objective lens (NA=0.68).
“and assuming perfect internal quantum efficiency of the QD, we estimate that 66% of the generated single photons are collected into the first objective lens (NA ¼ 0.68).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The internal quantum efficiency of the QD is perfect.
- Findingown data§ On-Demand Single Photons with High Extraction Efficiency and Near-Unity Indistinguishability from a Resonantly Driven Quantum Dot in a Micropillar
For two photons with cross polarization, the zero-delay peak has the same intensity as its adjacent peaks.
“In contrast, for two photons with cross polarization, the zero-delay peak has the same intensity as its adjacent peaks.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
At an increased time delay of 12.4 ns, the corrected visibility is 0.978(4).
“from which we extract raw and corrected visibilities of 0.959(3) and 0.978(4), respectively.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ On-Demand Single Photons with High Extraction Efficiency and Near-Unity Indistinguishability from a Resonantly Driven Quantum Dot in a Micropillar
The signal (RF) to background (mainly laser leakage) ratio is 40:1.
“The signal (RF) to background (mainly laser leakage) ratio is 40∶1.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ On-Demand Single Photons with High Extraction Efficiency and Near-Unity Indistinguishability from a Resonantly Driven Quantum Dot in a Micropillar
The high-resolution spectrum of pulsed RF is best fitted by a Voigt profile with homogeneous linewidth 1.91(7) GHz and inhomogeneous linewidth 1.14(9) GHz.
“Figure 2(a) shows a high-resolution spectrum of the pulsed RF, which can be best fitted using a Voigt profile with a homogeneous (Lorentzian) linewidth of 1.91( 7) GHz and inhomogeneous (Gaussian) linewidth of 1.14(9) GHz.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ On-Demand Single Photons with High Extraction Efficiency and Near-Unity Indistinguishability from a Resonantly Driven Quantum Dot in a Micropillar
The Purcell factor of the micropillar cavity is 6.3(4).
“which allows us to deduce a Purcell factor of 6.3(4).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [19] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingown data§ On-Demand Single Photons with High Extraction Efficiency and Near-Unity Indistinguishability from a Resonantly Driven Quantum Dot in a Micropillar
The single-photon counts reach maximum for a π pulse with a pumping laser power of 24 nW.
“The single-photon counts reaches the maximum for a π pulse with a pumping laser power of 24 nW.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ On-Demand Single Photons with High Extraction Efficiency and Near-Unity Indistinguishability from a Resonantly Driven Quantum Dot in a Micropillar
For two photons with identical polarization, an almost vanishing zero-delay peak is observed in time-delayed histograms of normalized two-photon counts.
“An almost vanishing zero-delay peak is observed for two photons with identical polarization.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ On-Demand Single Photons with High Extraction Efficiency and Near-Unity Indistinguishability from a Resonantly Driven Quantum Dot in a Micropillar
The RF photons show a raw two-photon interference visibility of 96.4(3)%.
“and a raw (corrected) two-photon interference visibility of 96.4(3)% [98.5(4)%].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
At an increased time delay of 12.4 ns, the raw visibility is 0.959(3).
“from which we extract raw and corrected visibilities of 0.959(3) and 0.978(4), respectively.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ On-Demand Single Photons with High Extraction Efficiency and Near-Unity Indistinguishability from a Resonantly Driven Quantum Dot in a Micropillar
The RF photons show a corrected two-photon interference visibility of 98.5(4)%.
“and a raw (corrected) two-photon interference visibility of 96.4(3)% [98.5(4)%].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ On-Demand Single Photons with High Extraction Efficiency and Near-Unity Indistinguishability from a Resonantly Driven Quantum Dot in a Micropillar
The shortest RF lifetime is 83.9 ps at 7.8 K.
“The shortest RF lifetime is 83.9 ps at 7.8 K”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ On-Demand Single Photons with High Extraction Efficiency and Near-Unity Indistinguishability from a Resonantly Driven Quantum Dot in a Micropillar
The raw two-photon quantum interference visibility is 0.964(3).
“We obtain a raw two-photon quantum interference visibility of 0.964(3).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ On-Demand Single Photons with High Extraction Efficiency and Near-Unity Indistinguishability from a Resonantly Driven Quantum Dot in a Micropillar
At π pulse, pulsed RF single photons have a count rate of 3.7 × 10^6 /sec on a silicon single-photon detector.
“By pulsed strict resonant excitation of a Purcell-enhanced QD-micropillar system, at π pulse we obtain pulsed RF single photons with a count rate of 3.7 × 10 6 = sec on a silicon single-photon detector”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ On-Demand Single Photons with High Extraction Efficiency and Near-Unity Indistinguishability from a Resonantly Driven Quantum Dot in a Micropillar
The RF photons show antibunching of g2(0)=0.009(2).
“The RF photons show an antibuching of g 2 ð0Þ ¼ 0.009ð2Þ”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ On-Demand Single Photons with High Extraction Efficiency and Near-Unity Indistinguishability from a Resonantly Driven Quantum Dot in a Micropillar
The homogeneous linewidth is very close to the lifetime-limited linewidth of 1.89 GHz.
“The homogeneous linewidth is very close to the lifetimelimited linewidth of 1.89 GHz.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ On-Demand Single Photons with High Extraction Efficiency and Near-Unity Indistinguishability from a Resonantly Driven Quantum Dot in a Micropillar
The count rate corresponds to an extraction efficiency of ∼66% from GaAs.
“which corresponds to an extraction efficiency of ∼66% from GaAs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The internal quantum efficiency of the QD is perfect.
- Findingcitation§ On-Demand Single Photons with High Extraction Efficiency and Near-Unity Indistinguishability from a Resonantly Driven Quantum Dot in a Micropillar
The single-photon nature of collected RF at π pulse is evident from second-order coherence measurement, with nearly vanishing multiphoton probability at zero delay [g2(0)=0.009(1)].
“The single-photon nature of the collected RF at the π pulse is evident from the second-order coherence measurement [22] shown in Fig. 2(c), where nearly vanishing multiphoton probability is observed at zero delay [g 2 ð0Þ ¼ 0.009ð1Þ].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [22] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingown data
At π pulse excitation, the source achieves an indistinguishability of 98.6%.
“simultaneously achieves a generation efficiency of 96%, extraction efficiency of 66%, singlephoton purity of 99.1%, and indistinguishability of 98.6%.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The current overall system efficiency of 4.6% is the highest reported in QDs.
“The current overall system efficiency-4.6%,the highest reported in QDs”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
At 28 K with a large (>1 meV) detuning, the decay time constant increases to 587.8 ps.
“At 28 K with a large (>1 meV) detuning, the decay time constant increases to 587.8 ps”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ On-Demand Single Photons with High Extraction Efficiency and Near-Unity Indistinguishability from a Resonantly Driven Quantum Dot in a Micropillar
The quality factor of the micropillar cavity is 6124.
“The quality factor of the micropillar cavity is measured to be 6124.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
At π pulse excitation, the source achieves a generation efficiency of 96%.
“simultaneously achieves a generation efficiency of 96%, extraction efficiency of 66%, singlephoton purity of 99.1%, and indistinguishability of 98.6%.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ On-Demand Single Photons with High Extraction Efficiency and Near-Unity Indistinguishability from a Resonantly Driven Quantum Dot in a Micropillar
Recapture of carriers into the QD micropillar due to nonresonant pumping can lead to significant degradation of single-photon purity.
“It has been shown that the recapture of carriers into the QD micropillar due to nonresonant pumping can lead to a significant degradation of the single-photon purity [13].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [13] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data§ On-Demand Single Photons with High Extraction Efficiency and Near-Unity Indistinguishability from a Resonantly Driven Quantum Dot in a Micropillar
The single-photon source combines high efficiency and near-perfect levels of purity and indistinguishability for the first time.
“Such a single-photon source for the first time combines the features of high efficiency and near-perfect levels of purity and indistinguishabilty”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The internal quantum efficiency of the QD is perfect.
- Interpretationreasoning§ On-Demand Single Photons with High Extraction Efficiency and Near-Unity Indistinguishability from a Resonantly Driven Quantum Dot in a Micropillar
The source opens the way to multiphoton experiments with semiconductor quantum dots.
“and thus opens the way to multiphoton experiments with semiconductor quantum dots.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ On-Demand Single Photons with High Extraction Efficiency and Near-Unity Indistinguishability from a Resonantly Driven Quantum Dot in a Micropillar
Self-assembled quantum dots possess the highest quantum efficiency in all solid-state single-photon devices so far.
“Self-assembled quantum dots (QDs) [4] have been shown to possess the highest quantum efficiency in all solid-state single-photon devices so far”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [4] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data
The inhomogeneous broadening of the pulsed RF photons is mainly from spectral diffusions at time scales much slower than 10 ns.
“indicating that the inhomogeneous broadening [see Fig. 2(a)] of the pulsed RF photons are mainly from spectral diffusions at time scales much slower than 10 ns.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ On-Demand Single Photons with High Extraction Efficiency and Near-Unity Indistinguishability from a Resonantly Driven Quantum Dot in a Micropillar
The detrimental effect of time jitter can be more severe when using a QD-microcavity system where the Purcell-reduced radiative lifetime T1 is comparable to or smaller than the time jitter.
“The detrimental effect of the time jitter can be more severe when using a QD-microcavity system where the Purcell-reduced radiative lifetime (T 1 ) of the QD, which bounds the single photon's coherence time (T 2 ) by T 2 ≤ 2T 1 , is comparable to or smaller than the time jitter [15].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [15] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data§ On-Demand Single Photons with High Extraction Efficiency and Near-Unity Indistinguishability from a Resonantly Driven Quantum Dot in a Micropillar
The work opens the way to scalable multiphoton quantum information experiments with solid-state devices.
“Our work opens the way to scalable multiphoton quantum information experiments with solid-state devices.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation§ On-Demand Single Photons with High Extraction Efficiency and Near-Unity Indistinguishability from a Resonantly Driven Quantum Dot in a Micropillar
Photon indistinguishability can be reduced by nonresonant excitation that induces homogeneous broadening of the excited state.
“Furthermore, the photon's indistinguishability can be reduced by nonresonant excitation that induces homogeneous broadening of the excited state [14]”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [14] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data§ On-Demand Single Photons with High Extraction Efficiency and Near-Unity Indistinguishability from a Resonantly Driven Quantum Dot in a Micropillar
The work reports the first single-photon source that combines near perfect single-photon purity, indistinguishability, and high extraction efficiency.
“In this Letter, we report the first single-photon source that combines near perfect single-photon purity, indistinguishability, and high extraction efficiency.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The internal quantum efficiency of the QD is perfect.
- Interpretationown data§ On-Demand Single Photons with High Extraction Efficiency and Near-Unity Indistinguishability from a Resonantly Driven Quantum Dot in a Micropillar
High generation and extraction efficiency are obtained with little compromise of single-photon purity.
“We emphasize that the high generation and extraction efficiency are obtained with little compromise of the singlephoton purity”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The internal quantum efficiency of the QD is perfect.
- Premisecitation§ On-Demand Single Photons with High Extraction Efficiency and Near-Unity Indistinguishability from a Resonantly Driven Quantum Dot in a Micropillar
Photon indistinguishability can be reduced by uncontrolled emission time jitter from nonradiative high-level to s-shell relaxation.
“and uncontrolled emission time jitter from the nonradiative high-level to s-shell relaxation [15].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [15] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ On-Demand Single Photons with High Extraction Efficiency and Near-Unity Indistinguishability from a Resonantly Driven Quantum Dot in a Micropillar
The pulsed RF technique is more critically needed for QDs with large Purcell factors where the reduced radiative lifetime approaches the time jitter.
“We note that the pulsed RF technique is more critically needed for QDs with large Purcell factors where the reduced radiative lifetime approaches the time jitter [11,15].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Premisecitation§ On-Demand Single Photons with High Extraction Efficiency and Near-Unity Indistinguishability from a Resonantly Driven Quantum Dot in a Micropillar
The planar cavity structure used in Ref. [11] allowed only ∼6% of generated single photons collected by the first lens.
“However, the planar cavity structure used in Ref. [11] has allowed only ∼6% of the generated single photons collected by the first lens.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [11] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation§ On-Demand Single Photons with High Extraction Efficiency and Near-Unity Indistinguishability from a Resonantly Driven Quantum Dot in a Micropillar
A Rabi oscillation is observed in detected pulsed RF photon counts as a function of incident field amplitude, due to coherent control of the QD two-level system.
“We observe a Rabi oscillation which is due to coherent control of the QD two-level system [21].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [21] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
The single-photon source can be readily used to perform multiphoton interferometric experiments with a solid-state platform.
“Such a single-photon source can be readily used to perform multiphoton interferometric experiments with a solid-state platform.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The QD-micropillar device has potential as an efficient source of a string of indistinguishable single photons, suitable for linear optical quantum computing and Boson sampling experiments with time-bin encoding.
“This demonstrates the potential of this QD-micropillar device as an efficient source of a string of indistinguishable single photons, which are particularly suitable for linear optical quantum computing and Boson sampling experiments with time-bin encoding [26].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [26] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationnone given
The time-jitter free, pulsed RF method is compatible with higher Purcell factor.
“The time-jitter free, pulsed RF method is compatible with higher Purcell factor”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
- May combine two claims. 10
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 7
May combine two claims.
Findingown data§ On-Demand Single Photons with High Extraction Efficiency and Near-Unity Indistinguishability from a Resonantly Driven Quantum Dot in a MicropillarAt π pulse, the count rate is 3700000/sec under 81 MHz repetition rate, giving an overall system efficiency of 4.6%.
“At the π pulse, we observe a count rate of 3700000= sec on a silicon single-photon detector, under 81 MHz repetition rate laser excitation, which gives an overall system efficiency of 4.6%.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown data§ On-Demand Single Photons with High Extraction Efficiency and Near-Unity Indistinguishability from a Resonantly Driven Quantum Dot in a MicropillarThe photoluminescence intensity reaches a plateau at a temperature range of 4.5-10 K.
“The photoluminescence intensity reaches a plateau at a temperature range of 4.5-10 K.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ On-Demand Single Photons with High Extraction Efficiency and Near-Unity Indistinguishability from a Resonantly Driven Quantum Dot in a MicropillarIn nonresonant excitation experiments, single-photon generation efficiencies typically increased asymptotically with pump power, and a trade-off between efficiency and single-photon purity and/or indistinguishability was observed.
“In the nonresonant excitation experiments, single-photon generation efficiencies typically increased asymptotically with pump power, and a trade-off between efficiency and single-photon purity and/or indistinguishability were observed [5][6][7][8][9][10].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
Premisenone given§ On-Demand Single Photons with High Extraction Efficiency and Near-Unity Indistinguishability from a Resonantly Driven Quantum Dot in a MicropillarMost previous experiments either relied on nonresonant excitation of a QD microcavity that degraded photon purity and indistinguishability, or used resonant excitation of a QD in a planar cavity that limited extraction efficiency.
“The reason is that most previous experiments either relied on nonresonant excitation of a QD microcavity that degraded the photon purity and indistinguishability, or used resonant excitation of a QD in a planar cavity that limited the extraction efficiency.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataIncreasing the time delay by 10 ns has a negligible effect on the photons' indistinguishability, in strong contrast to Ref. [9] that used nonresonant excitation.
“In strong contrast to Ref. [9] that used nonresonant excitation, increasing the time delay by 10 ns has a negligible effect on the photons' indistinguishability”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [9] source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisenone given§ On-Demand Single Photons with High Extraction Efficiency and Near-Unity Indistinguishability from a Resonantly Driven Quantum Dot in a MicropillarPulsed s-shell resonant excitation has been demonstrated to yield near-unity indistinguishability by eliminating emission time jitter and dephasings, but only for QDs in planar cavities.
“Pulsed s-shell resonant excitation has been demonstrated to yield a near-unity indistinguishability by eliminating emission time jitter and dephasings, however, only for QDs in planar cavities.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationcitation§ On-Demand Single Photons with High Extraction Efficiency and Near-Unity Indistinguishability from a Resonantly Driven Quantum Dot in a MicropillarThe inhomogeneous component in the spectrum can be caused by spectral diffusion due to charge fluctuations in the vicinity of the QD.
“The inhomogeneous (Gaussian) component in the spectrum can be caused by spectral diffusion due to charge fluctuations in the vicinity of the QD [20].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [20] source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ On-Demand Single Photons with High Extraction Efficiency and Near-Unity Indistinguishability from a Resonantly Driven Quantum Dot in a MicropillarBy s-shell resonant laser excitation on a single QD with picosecond laser pulses, near-background-free resonance fluorescence has been obtained and allowed observation of Rabi oscillations.
“By s-shell resonant laser excitation on a single QD with picosecond laser pulses, near-background-free resonance fluorescence (RF) has been obtained and allowed the observation of Rabi oscillations [11].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [11] source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ On-Demand Single Photons with High Extraction Efficiency and Near-Unity Indistinguishability from a Resonantly Driven Quantum Dot in a MicropillarUnder π pulse excitation, single photons have been deterministically generated with a single-photon purity of 98.8(2)% and indistinguishability of 97(2)%.
“Under π pulse excitation, single photons have been deterministically generated with a single-photon purity of 98.8(2)% and indistinguishability of 97(2)%.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [11] source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Premisecitation§ On-Demand Single Photons with High Extraction Efficiency and Near-Unity Indistinguishability from a Resonantly Driven Quantum Dot in a MicropillarA high degree of indistinguishability is at the heart of optical quantum computing, Boson sampling, and solid-state quantum networks.
“Another crucial demand is that the photons should possess a high degree of indistinguishability, which is at the heart of optical quantum computing [2], Boson sampling [23], and solid-state quantum networks [24].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationHeralded single photons produced by parametric down conversion have served as the workhorse for multiphoton interferometric experiments in the past decades.
“We compare the performance of the single-photon source created in this work with heralded single photons produced by parametric down conversion [27], which have served as the workhorse for multiphoton interferometric experiments in the past decades [2].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown data§ On-Demand Single Photons with High Extraction Efficiency and Near-Unity Indistinguishability from a Resonantly Driven Quantum Dot in a MicropillarThe single-photon counts growing asymptotically with excitation laser power in previous nonresonant excitation experiments contrasts with the present observation, so near-unity efficiency would need very high power pumping in those previous experiments.
“We note that this is in stark contrast to previous experiments with nonresonant excitation where the generated single-photon counts typically grow asymptotically with excitation laser power; thus, a near unity efficiency would need very high power pumping.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationcitationHigh-efficiency extraction of transition-selective RF would allow fast (nsec), high-fidelity single-shot readout of single electron spins.
“In addition to the photonic applications, the high-efficiency extraction of transitionselective RF would also allow a fast (nsec), high-fidelity single-shot readout of single electron spins [29].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [29] source
Not checked in the free run.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The internal quantum efficiency of the QD is perfect.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataFor applications such as Boson sampling that need single photons as input, the single-photon source realized here is superior, as it is ten times brighter, near perfectly pure and indistinguishable, and requires a pump power that is 7 orders of magnitude lower.
“For applications such as Boson sampling [23] that needs single photons as input, the single-photon source realized here is superior, as it is ten times brighter, near perfectly pure and indistinguishable, and requires a pump power that is 7 orders of magnitude lower.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [23] source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn the previous demonstration of eight-photon entanglement, sources of triggered single photons were generated with a count rate of 310000/sec, multiphoton emission probability of 2.9%, raw indistinguishability of 76%, under laser pump power of 880 mW.
“In the previous demonstration of the largest, eight-photon entanglement [28], sources of triggered single photons were generated with a count rate of 310000= sec, multiphoton emission probability of 2.9% and raw indistinguishablility of 76%, under a laser pump power of 880 mW.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [28] source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningImmediate applications include implementation of Boson sampling with time-bin encoding using a loop-based architecture.
“Immediate applications include implementation of Boson sampling [23] with time-bin encoding using a loop-based architecture [26].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
The authors state this as an assumption.
The internal quantum efficiency of the QD is perfect.
“assuming perfect internal quantum efficiency of the QD”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
With the rapid development of other types of single-photon sources, such as those based on quantum dots, it is likely this obstacle will soon be overcome.
“Moreover, with the rapid development of other types of singlephoton sources, such as those based on quantum dots, 45,46 it is likely this obstacle will soon be overcome.”
From Integrated-optics heralded controlled-NOT gate for polarization-encoded qubits (2018) · cites this paper as [45]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Summary gives a different photon indistinguishability
MinorThe summary reports 98.6% indistinguishability, whereas the opening paragraph reports 98.5% for the π-pulse source, matching the results section's corrected value of 0.985(4).
“indistinguishability of 98.6%”
“photon indistinguishability of 98.5%”
Different uncertainties reported for the same antibunching measurement
MinorThe π-pulse second-order correlation is reported as 0.009(2) in the overview but as 0.009(1) in the results and Fig. 2 caption. The central value agrees, but its reported uncertainty does not.
“g 2 ð0Þ ¼ 0.009ð2Þ”
“g 2 ð0Þ ¼ 0.009ð1Þ”
Cites
Measurement of subpicosecond time intervals between two photons by interference
Hong, C. K., Ou, Z. Y., & Mandel, L. (1987) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.59.2044 · Cited by 4,369 · see citing works
New High-Intensity Source of Polarization-Entangled Photon Pairs
Kwiat, P. G., Mattle, K., Weinfurter, H., Zeilinger, A., Sergienko, A. V., & Shih, Y. (1995) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.75.4337 · Cited by 3,102 · see citing works
Linear optical quantum computing with photonic qubits
Kok, P., Munro, W. J., Nemoto, K., Ralph, T. C., Dowling, J. P., & Milburn, G. J. (2007) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.79.135 · Cited by 2,803 · see citing works
A Quantum Dot Single-Photon Turnstile Device
Michler, P., Kıraz, A., Becher, C., Schoenfeld, W. V., Petroff, P. M., Zhang, L., Hu, E. L., & İmamoğlu, A. (2000) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.290.5500.2282 · Cited by 2,409 · see citing works
O'Brien, J. L., Furusawa, A., & Vučković, J. (2009) · Nature Photonics · doi:10.1038/nphoton.2009.229 · Cited by 2,388 · see citing works
Indistinguishable photons from a single-photon device
Santori, C., Fattal, D., Vučković, J., Solomon, G. S., & Yamamoto, Y. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature01086 · Cited by 1,559 · see citing works
Interfacing single photons and single quantum dots with photonic nanostructures
Lodahl, P., Mahmoodian, S., & Stobbe, S. (2015) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.87.347 · Cited by 1,465 · see citing works
Multiphoton entanglement and interferometry
Pan, J.-W., Chen, Z.-B., Lu, C.-Y., Weinfurter, H., Zeilinger, A., & Żukowski, M. (2012) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.84.777 · Cited by 1,410 · see citing works
Self-citationDetecting single infrared photons with 93% system efficiency
Marsili, F., Verma, V. B., Stern, J. A., Harrington, S. D., Lita, A. E., Gerrits, T., Vayshenker, I., Baek, B., Shaw, M. D., Mirin, R. P., et al. (2013) · Nature Photonics · doi:10.1038/nphoton.2013.13 · Cited by 1,177 · see citing works
Electrically Driven Single-Photon Source
Yuan, Z. L., Kardynal, B. E., Stevenson, R. M., Shields, A. J., Lobo, C. J., Cooper, K. B., Beattie, N. S., Ritchie, D. A., & Pepper, M. (2002) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1066790 · Cited by 1,173 · see citing works
Enhanced Spontaneous Emission by Quantum Boxes in a Monolithic Optical Microcavity
Gérard, J., Sermage, B., Gayral, B., Legrand, B., Costard, E., & Thierry-Mieg, V. (1998) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.81.1110 · Cited by 1,133 · see citing works
A highly efficient single-photon source based on a quantum dot in a photonic nanowire
Claudon, J., Bleuse, J., Malik, N. S., Bazin, M., Jaffrennou, P., Gregersen, N., Sauvan, C., Lalanne, P., & Gérard, J. (2009) · Nature Photonics · doi:10.1038/nphoton.2009.287 · Cited by 988 · see citing works
Self-citationEnglund, D., Fattal, D., Waks, E., Solomon, G., Zhang, B., Nakaoka, T., Arakawa, Y., Yamamoto, Y., & Vučković, J. (2005) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.95.013904 · Cited by 985 · see citing works
Triggered Single Photons from a Quantum Dot
Santori, C., Pelton, M., Solomon, G., Dale, Y., & Yamamoto, Y. (2001) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.86.1502 · Cited by 928 · see citing works
Lounis, B., & Orrit, M. (2005) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/0034-4885/68/5/r04 · Cited by 908 · see citing works
Boson Sampling on a Photonic Chip
Spring, J. B., Metcalf, B. J., Humphreys, P. C., Kolthammer, W. S., Jin, X.-M., Barbieri, M., Datta, A., Thomas-Peter, N., Langford, N. K., Kundys, D., et al. (2013) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1231692 · Cited by 837 · see citing works
Coherent properties of a two-level system based on a quantum-dot photodiode
Zrenner, A., Beham, E., Stufler, S., Findeis, F., Bichler, M., & Abstreiter, G. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature00912 · Cited by 775 · see citing works
Tillmann, M., Dakić, B., Heilmann, R., Nolte, S., Szameit, A., & Walther, P. (2013) · Nature Photonics · doi:10.1038/nphoton.2013.102 · Cited by 709 · see citing works
Efficient Source of Single Photons: A Single Quantum Dot in a Micropost Microcavity
Pelton, M. A., Santori, C., Jelena Vuckovic, A., Zhang, B., Solomon, G. S., Plant, J., & Yamamoto, Y. (2002) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.89.233602 · Cited by 682 · see citing works
A highly efficient single-photon source based on a quantum dot in a photonic nanowire
Claudon, J., Bleuse, J., Malik, N. S., Bazin, M., Jaffrennou, P., Gregersen, N., Sauvan, C., Lalanne, P., & Gérard, J.-M. (2010) · Nature Photonics · doi:10.1038/nphoton.2009.287x · Cited by 669 · see citing works
Self-citationIntegrated multimode interferometers with arbitrary designs for photonic boson sampling
Crespi, A., Osellame, R., Ramponi, R., Brod, D. J., Galvão, E. F., Spagnolo, N., Vitelli, C., Maiorino, E., Mataloni, P., & Sciarrino, F. (2013) · Nature Photonics · doi:10.1038/nphoton.2013.112 · Cited by 662 · see citing works
Coherent generation of non-classical light on a chip via photon-induced tunnelling and blockade
Faraon, A., Fushman, I., Englund, D., Stoltz, N., Petroff, P. M., & Jelena Vuckovic, A. (2008) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/nphys1078 · Cited by 660 · see citing works
Photonic Boson Sampling in a Tunable Circuit
Broome, M. A., Fedrizzi, A., Rahimi-Keshari, S., Dove, J., Aaronson, S., Ralph, T. C., & White, A. G. (2013) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1231440 · Cited by 634 · see citing works
Fox, A. M. (2006) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198566724.001.0001 · Cited by 592 · see citing works
On-demand semiconductor single-photon source with near-unity indistinguishability
He, Y.-M., He, Y., Wei, Y.-J., Wu, D., Atatüre, M., Schneider, C., Höfling, S., Kamp, M., Lu, C.-Y., & Pan, J.-W. (2013) · Nature Nanotechnology · doi:10.1038/nnano.2012.262 · Cited by 559 · see citing works
Self-citationOn-demand generation of indistinguishable polarization-entangled photon pairs
Müller, M. A., Bounouar, S., Jöns, K. D., Glässl, M., & Michler, P. (2014) · Nature Photonics · doi:10.1038/nphoton.2013.377 · Cited by 466 · see citing works
Bright single-photon sources in bottom-up tailored nanowires
Reimer, M. E., Bulgarini, G., Akopian, N., Hocevar, M., Bavinck, M. B., Verheijen, M. A., Bakkers, E. P. A. M., Kouwenhoven, L. P., & Zwiller, V. (2012) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms1746 · Cited by 449 · see citing works
Observation of eight-photon entanglement
Yao, X.-C., Wang, T.-X., Xu, P., Lu, H., Pan, G.-S., Bao, X.-H., Peng, C.-Z., Lu, C.-Y., Chen, Y.-A., & Pan, J.-W. (2012) · Nature Photonics · doi:10.1038/nphoton.2011.354 · Cited by 433 · see citing works
Self-citationEngineered quantum dot single-photon sources
Buckley, S., Rivoire, K., & Vučković, J. (2012) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/0034-4885/75/12/126503 · Cited by 431 · see citing works
Bright solid-state sources of indistinguishable single photons
Gazzano, O., Michaelis de Vasconcellos, S., Arnold, C., Nowak, A., Galopin, E., Sagnes, I., Lanco, L., Lemaître, A., & Senellart, P. (2013) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms2434 · Cited by 402 · see citing works
High-frequency single-photon source with polarization control
Strauf, S., Stoltz, N. G., Rakher, M. T., Coldren, L. A., Petroff, P. M., & Bouwmeester, D. (2007) · Nature Photonics · doi:10.1038/nphoton.2007.227 · Cited by 383 · see citing works
Resonance Fluorescence from a Coherently Driven Semiconductor Quantum Dot in a Cavity
Muller, A., Flagg, E. B., Bianucci, P., Wang, X. Y., Deppe, D. G., Ma, W., Zhang, J., Salamo, G. J., Xiao, M., & Shih, C. K. (2007) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.99.187402 · Cited by 360 · see citing works
Nanoscale optical positioning of single quantum dots for bright and pure single-photon emission
Sapienza, L., Davanço, M., Badolato, A., & Srinivasan, K. A. (2015) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms8833 · Cited by 345 · see citing works
Resonantly driven coherent oscillations in a solid-state quantum emitter
Flagg, E. B., Müller, A., Robertson, J. W., Founta, S., DEPPE, D. G., Xiao, M., Ma, W., Salamo, G. J., & Shih, C.-K. K. (2009) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/nphys1184 · Cited by 343 · see citing works
Gschrey, M., Thoma, A., Schnauber, P., Seifried, M., Schmidt, R., Wohlfeil, B., Krüger, L., Schulze, J. H., Heindel, T., Burger, S., et al. (2015) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms8662 · Cited by 315 · see citing works
Spin-resolved quantum-dot resonance fluorescence
Vamivakas, A. N., Zhao, Y., Lu, C., & Atatüre, M. (2009) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/nphys1182 · Cited by 291 · see citing works
Self-citationThe Question of Correlation between Photons in Coherent Light Rays
Brown, R. H., & Twiss, R. Q. (1956) · Nature · doi:10.1038/1781447a0 · Cited by 270 · see citing works
Ates, S., Ulrich, S. M., Reitzenstein, S., Löffler, A., Forchel, A., & Michler, P. (2009) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.103.167402 · Cited by 265 · see citing works
Interference of Single Photons from Two Separate Semiconductor Quantum Dots
Flagg, E. B., Müller, A., Polyakov, S. V., Ling, A., Migdall, A. L., & Solomon, G. S. (2010) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.104.137401 · Cited by 255 · see citing works
Resonant Excitation of a Quantum Dot Strongly Coupled to a Photonic Crystal Nanocavity
Englund, D., Majumdar, A., Faraon, A., et al. (2010) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.104.073904 · Cited by 225 · see citing works
Electrically driven quantum dot-micropillar single photon source with 34% overall efficiency
Heindel, T., Schneider, C., Lermer, M., Kwon, S. H., Braun, T., Reitzenstein, S., Höfling, S., Kamp, M., & Forchel, A. (2010) · Applied Physics Letters · doi:10.1063/1.3284514 · Cited by 205 · see citing works
Self-citationWei, Y.-J., He, Y.-M., Chen, M.-C., Hu, Y.-N., He, Y., Wu, D., Schneider, C., Kamp, M., Höfling, S., Lu, C.-Y., et al. (2014) · Nano Letters · doi:10.1021/nl503081n · Cited by 169 · see citing works
Self-citationDeterministic Photon Pairs and Coherent Optical Control of a Single Quantum Dot
Jayakumar, H., Predojević, A., Huber, T., Kauten, T., Solomon, G. S., & Weihs, G. (2013) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.110.135505 · Cited by 162 · see citing works
Munsch, M., Malik, N. S., Dupuy, E., Delga, A., Bleuse, J., Gérard, J.-M., Claudon, J., Gregersen, N., & Mørk, J. (2013) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.110.177402 · Cited by 157 · see citing works
Self-citationLinear Optical Quantum Computing in a Single Spatial Mode
Humphreys, P. C., Metcalf, B. J., Spring, J. B., Moore, M., Jin, X., Barbieri, M., Kolthammer, W. S., & Walmsley, I. A. (2013) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.111.150501 · Cited by 155 · see citing works
Observation of spin-dependent quantum jumps via quantum dot resonance fluorescence
Vamivakas, A. N., Lu, C., Matthiesen, C., Zhao, Y., Fält, S., Badolato, A., & Atatüre, M. (2010) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature09359 · Cited by 155 · see citing works
Self-citationHouel, J., Kuhlmann, A. V., Greuter, L., Xue, F., Poggio, M., Gerardot, B. D., Dalgarno, P. A., Badolato, A., Petroff, P. M., Ludwig, A., et al. (2012) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.108.107401 · Cited by 153 · see citing works
Scalable Boson Sampling with Time-Bin Encoding Using a Loop-Based Architecture
Motes, K. R., Gilchrist, A., Dowling, J. P., & Rohde, P. P. (2014) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.113.120501 · Cited by 141 · see citing works
Single-photon generation with InAs quantum dots
Santori, C., Fattal, D. A., Jelena Vuckovic, A., Solomon, G. S., & Yamamoto, Y. (2004) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/6/1/089 · Cited by 130 · see citing works
Madsen, K. H., Ateş, S., Liu, J., Javadi, A., Albrecht, S. M., Yeo, I., Stobbe, S., & Lodahl, P. (2014) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.90.155303 · Cited by 95 · see citing works
Delteil, A., Gao, W., Fallahi, P., et al. (2014) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.112.116802 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
The Computational Complexity of Linear Optics
Aaronson, S., & Arkhipov, A. (2014) · Research in Optical Sciences · doi:10.1364/qim.2014.qth1a.2 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
Cavity-stimulated Raman emission from a single quantum dot spin
Sweeney, T. M., Carter, S., Bracker, A. S., Kim, M., Kim, C. S., Yang, L., Vora, P. M., Brereton, P., Cleveland, E. R., & Gammon, D. (2014) · Nature Photonics · doi:10.1038/nphoton.2014.84 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
Two-photon interference from remote quantum dots with inhomogeneously broadened linewidths
Gold, P., Thoma, A., Maier, S. A., Reitzenstein, S., Schneider, C., Höfling, S., & Kamp, M. (2014) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.89.035313 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Self-citationLu, C., Zhao, Y., Vamivakas, A. N., Matthiesen, C., Fält, S., Badolato, A., & Atatüre, M. (2010) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.81.035332 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Self-citationHe, Y., He, Y.-M., Wei, Y.-J., Jiang, X. Q., Chen, M.-C., Xiong, F.-L., Zhao, Y., Schneider, C., Kamp, M., Höfling, S., et al. (2013) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.111.237403 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
Self-citationResonant excitonic emission of a single quantum dot in the Rabi regime
Melet, R., Voliotis, V., Enderlin, A., Roditchev, D., Wang, X. L., Guillet, T., & Grousson, R. (2008) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.78.073301 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Bright single photon source based on self-aligned quantum dot–cavity systems
Maier, S., Gold, P., Forchel, A., Gregersen, N., Mørk, J., Höfling, S., Schneider, C., & Kamp, M. (2014) · Optics Express · doi:10.1364/oe.22.008136 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Self-citationBennett, A. J., Unitt, D. C., Shields, A. J., Atkinson, P., & Ritchie, D. A. (2005) · Optics Express · doi:10.1364/opex.13.007772 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Unsleber, S., McCutcheon, D. P. S., Dambach, M., Lermer, M., Gregersen, N., Höfling, S., Mørk, J., Schneider, C., & Kamp, M. (2015) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.91.075413 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Self-citationInfluence of the Purcell effect on the purity of bright single photon sources
Giesz, V., Gazzano, O., Nowak, A. K., Portalupi, S. L., Lemaître, A., Sagnes, I., Lanco, L., & Senellart, P. (2013) · Applied Physics Letters · doi:10.1063/1.4813902 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- S. Aaronson, 2011, Proceedings of the 43rd Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, 2011, San Jose
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Solid-state single-photon emitters
Aharonovich, I., Englund, D., & Toth, M. (2016) · Nature Photonics · doi:10.1038/nphoton.2016.186 · Cited by 1,786 · see citing works
Integrated photonic quantum technologies
Wang, J., Sciarrino, F., Laing, A., & Thompson, M. G. (2020) · Nature Photonics · doi:10.1038/s41566-019-0532-1 · Cited by 1,576 · see citing works
Hybrid integrated quantum photonic circuits
Elshaari, A. W., Pernice, W., Srinivasan, K., Benson, O., & Zwiller, V. (2020) · Nature Photonics · doi:10.1038/s41566-020-0609-x · Cited by 805 · see citing works
Heterogeneous integration for on-chip quantum photonic circuits with single quantum dot devices
Davanco, M., Liu, J., Sapienza, L., Zhang, C.-Z., De Miranda Cardoso, J. V., Verma, V., Mirin, R., Nam, S. W., Liu, L., & Srinivasan, K. (2017) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-017-00987-6 · Cited by 306 · see citing works
Hybrid integration methods for on-chip quantum photonics
Kim, J.-H., Aghaeimeibodi, S., Carolan, J., Englund, D., & Waks, E. (2020) · Optica · doi:10.1364/optica.384118 · Cited by 272 · see citing works
“Furthermore, researchers are continually developing techniques for controlling the emitters’ position [54–57], frequency [58–63], and dephasing [21,64], which have brought solid-state quantum emitters to the forefront of quantum light sources.”
BackgroundGeneration and sampling of quantum states of light in a silicon chip
Paesani, S., Ding, Y., Santagati, R., Chakhmakhchyan, L., Vigliar, C., Rottwitt, K., Oxenløwe, L. K., Wang, J., Thompson, M. G., & Laing, A. (2019) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/s41567-019-0567-8 · Cited by 214 · see citing works
Applications of single photons to quantum communication and computing
Couteau, C., Barz, S., Durt, T., Gerrits, T., Huwer, J., Prevedel, R., Rarity, J., Shields, A., & Weihs, G. (2023) · Nature Reviews Physics · doi:10.1038/s42254-023-00583-2 · Cited by 216 · see citing works
Two-photon interference from a bright single-photon source at telecom wavelengths
Kim, J.-H., Cai, T., Richardson, C. J. K., Leavitt, R. P., & Waks, E. (2016) · Optica · doi:10.1364/optica.3.000577 · Cited by 144 · see citing works
Frequency multiplexing for quasi-deterministic heralded single-photon sources
Joshi, C., Farsi, A., Clemmen, S., Ramelow, S., & Gaeta, A. L. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-03254-4 · Cited by 157 · see citing works
Chip-scale nonlinear photonics for quantum light generation
Moody, G., Chang, L., Steiner, T. J., & Bowers, J. E. (2020) · AVS Quantum Science · doi:10.1116/5.0020684 · Cited by 117 · see citing works
Quantum frequency conversion of a quantum dot single-photon source on a nanophotonic chip
Singh, A., Li, Q., Liu, S., Yu, Y., Lu, X., Schneider, C., Höfling, S., Lawall, J., Verma, V., Mirin, R., et al. (2019) · Optica · doi:10.1364/optica.6.000563 · Cited by 99 · see citing works
Self-citationIntegrated-optics heralded controlled-NOT gate for polarization-encoded qubits
Zeuner, J., Sharma, A. N., Tillmann, M., Heilmann, R., Gräfe, M., Moqanaki, A., Szameit, A., & Walther, P. (2018) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/s41534-018-0068-0 · Cited by 95 · see citing works
Schnauber, P., Singh, A., Schall, J., Park, S. I., Song, J. D., Rodt, S., Srinivasan, K., Reitzenstein, S., & Davanco, M. (2019) · Nano Letters · doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b02758 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
- Authors
- Ding, X., He, Y., Duan, Z.-C., Gregersen, N., Chen, M.-C., Unsleber, S., Maier, S., Schneider, C., Kamp, M., Höfling, S., Lu, C.-Y., & Pan, J.-W.
- Affiliations
- University of Science and Technology of China (CN)
- Technical University of Denmark (DK)
- University of Würzburg (DE)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Physical Review Letters
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2016-01-14
- Volume
- 116
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 020401-020401
- ISSN
- 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
- 1079-7114
- OpenAlex
- W2223884576
- Semantic Scholar
- c89cbecf3d2c4fdfcb92c521bd92a9060d72f4ae
- Cited by
- 908
- References
- 61
- Citations by year
- 2026: 55 · 2025: 62 · 2024: 64 · 2023: 69 · 2022: 80 · 2021: 88 · 2020: 88 · 2019: 115 · 2018: 112 · 2017: 121 · 2016: 53
- FWCI
- 63.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Physical Review Letters (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- Technical University of Denmark, DTU Orbit (Technical University of Denmark, DTU) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- St Andrews Research Repository (St Andrews Research Repository) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China
- Chinese Academy of Sciences
- Danish Research Council for Technology and Production
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Semiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Strong Light-Matter Interactions
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum optics and atomic interactions
- Keywords
- single-photon sources, quantum dots, micropillars, Purcell effect, resonance fluorescence, photon indistinguishability, photon extraction efficiency, semiconductor quantum dots
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-09.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-09.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review