Cited by 1,229

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Near-optimal single-photon sources in the solid state

Somaschi, N., Giesz, V., De Santis, L., Loredo, J. C., Almeida, M. P., Hornecker, G., Portalupi, S. L., Grange, T., Antón, C., Demory, J., Gómez, C., Sagnes, I., Lanzillotti-Kimura, N. D., Lemaítre, A., Auffeves, A., White, A. G., Lanco, L., Senellart, P.·2016·Nature Photonics

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nphoton.2016.23

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Deterministic single-photon sources include trapped ions, colour centers and quantum dots with various materials.

    “Deterministic sources include trapped ions [205], colour centers [203] and quantum dots (QD) [216] with GaAs [217], InGaAs [29,[191][192][193]199], InAsP NW [201,202] or InAs/GaAs [195][196][197][198].”

    From Photonic quantum information processing: a review (2019) · cites this paper as [205]

  • Processing significantly larger numbers of photons will likely rely on the continuous development of multiplexed parametric SPSs and de-multiplexed QD-SPSs.

    “However, processing significantly larger numbers of photons will likely rely on the continuous development of multiplexed parametric SPSs [49, 50] and de-multiplexed QD-SPSs [56, 57].”

    From Integrated photonic quantum technologies (2020) · cites this paper as [57]

  • To date the highest number of photons generated in a Boson sampling experiment have been through the demultiplexing of a single quantum dot single-photon source.

    “To date the highest number of photons generated in a Boson sampling experiment have been through the demultiplexing of a single QD-SPS [57-59]: Fig.5b .”

    From Integrated photonic quantum technologies (2020) · cites this paper as [57]

  • 5-photon QD Boson sampling was implemented with a high rate of 4 Hz, using near-optimal single-photons from a single QD-SPS actively de-multiplexed into 5 spatial modes and scattered in an ultra-low-loss 9×9 photonic circuit.

    “implementation of 5-photon QD Boson sampling with a high rate of 4 Hz. Near-optimal single-photons emitted from a single QD-SPS are actively de-multiplexed into 5 spatial modes, and the 5 photons are scattered in a ultra-low-loss 9×9 photonic circuit.”

    From Integrated photonic quantum technologies (2020) · cites this paper as [57]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 25

  1. O'Brien, J. L., Furusawa, A. & Vučković, J. Photonic quantum technologies. Nature Photon. 3, 687–695 (2009). · DOI · Paper page
  2. Hosseini, M., Campbell, G., Sparkes, B. M., Lam, P. K. & Buchler, B. C. Unconditional room-temperature quantum memory. Nature Phys. 7, 794–798 (2011). · DOI
  3. Eisaman, M. D., Fan, J., Migdall, A. & Polyakov, S. V. Single-photon sources and detectors. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 82, 071101 (2011). · DOI · Paper page
  4. Spring, J. B. et al. Boson sampling on a photonic chip. Science 339, 798–801 (2013). · DOI · Paper page
  5. Tillmann, M. et al. Experimental boson sampling. Nature Photon. 7, 540–544 (2013). · DOI · Paper page
  6. Ma, X., Zotter, S., Kofler, J., Jennewein, T. & Zeilinger, A. Experimental generation of single photons via active multiplexing. Phys. Rev. A 83, 043814 (2011). · DOI
  7. Takeoka, M., Jin, R.-B. & Sasaki, M. Full analysis of multi-photon pair effects in spontaneous parametric down conversion based photonic quantum information processing. New J. Phys. 17, 043030 (2015). · DOI
  8. Shalm, L. K. et al. Three-photon energy–time entanglement. Nature Phys. 9, 19–22 (2013). · DOI
  9. Guerreiro, T. et al. Nonlinear interaction between single photons. Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 173601 (2014). · DOI
  10. Michler, P. et al. A quantum dot single-photon turnstile device. Science 290, 2282–2285 (2000). · DOI
  11. Madsen, K. H. et al. Efficient out-coupling of high-purity single photons from a coherent quantum dot in a photonic-crystal cavity. Phys. Rev. B 90, 155303 (2014). · DOI
  12. Gazzano, O. et al. Bright solid-state sources of indistinguishable single photons. Nature Commun. 4, 1425 (2013). · DOI · Paper page
  13. Claudon, J. et al. A highly efficient single-photon source based on a quantum dot in a photonic nanowire. Nature Photon. 4, 174–177 (2010). · DOI · Paper page
  14. Reimer, M. E. et al. Bright single-photon sources in bottom-up tailored nanowires. Nature Commun. 3, 737 (2012). · DOI · Paper page
  15. Kuhlmann, A. V. et al. Charge noise and spin noise in a semiconductor quantum device. Nature Phys. 9, 570–575 (2013). · DOI
  16. He, Y.-M. et al. On-demand semiconductor single-photon source with near-unity indistinguishability. Nature Nanotech. 8, 213–217 (2013). · DOI · Paper page
  17. Wei, Y.-J. et al. Deterministic and robust generation of single photons from a single quantum dot with 99.5% indistinguishability using adiabatic rapid passage. Nano Lett. 14, 6515–6519 (2014). · DOI · Paper page
  18. Dousse, A. et al. Controlled light–matter coupling for a single quantum dot embedded in a pillar microcavity using far-field optical lithography. Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 267404 (2008). · DOI
  19. Nowak, A. K. et al. Deterministic and electrically tunable bright single-photon source. Nature Commun. 5, 3240 (2014). · DOI
  20. Kiraz, A., Atatüre, M. & Imamoğlu, A. Quantum-dot single-photon sources: prospects for applications in linear optics quantum-information processing. Phys. Rev. A 69, 032305 (2004). · DOI
  21. Giesz, V. et al. Coherent control of a solid-state quantum bit with few-photon pulses. Preprint at http://arxiv.org/abs/1512.04725 (2015). · arXiv
  22. Barbieri, M. Effects of frequency correlation in linear optical entangling gates operated with independent photons. Phys. Rev. A 76, 043825 (2007). · DOI
  23. Weinhold, T. J. et al. Understanding photonic quantum-logic gates: the road to fault tolerance. Preprint at http://arxiv.org/abs/0808.0794 (2008). · arXiv
  24. Barbieri, M. et al. Parametric downconversion and optical quantum gates: two's company, four's a crowd. J. Mod. Opt. 56, 209–214 (2009). · DOI · Paper page
  25. Tillmann, M. et al. Generalized multi-photon quantum interference. Phys. Rev. X 5, 041015 (2014).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Somaschi, N., Giesz, V., De Santis, L., Loredo, J. C., Almeida, M. P., Hornecker, G., Portalupi, S. L., Grange, T., Antón, C., Demory, J., Gómez, C., Sagnes, I., Lanzillotti-Kimura, N. D., Lemaítre, A., Auffeves, A., White, A. G., Lanco, L., & Senellart, P.
Venue
Nature Photonics
Published
2016-03-07
Volume
10
Issue
5
Pages
340-345
ISSN
  • 1749-4885
  • 1749-4893
Cited by
1,229
References
12
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review