The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Photodynamic therapy in the treatment of microbial infections: Basic principles and perspective applications
Open accessAbstract
Background and Objectives: Photodynamic therapy (PDT) appears to be endowed with several favorable features for the treatment of infections originated by microbial pathogens, including a broad spectrum of action, the efficient inactivation of antibiotic‐resistant strains, the low mutagenic potential, and the lack of selection of photoresistant microbial cells. Therefore, intensive studies are being pursued in order to define the scope and field of application of this approach. Results: Optimal cytocidal activity against a large variety of bacterial, fungal, and protozoan pathogens has been found to be typical of photosensitizers that are positively charged at physiological pH values (e.g., for the presence of quaternarized amino groups or the association with polylysine moieties) and are characterized by a moderate hydrophobicity (n‐octanol/water partition coefficient around 10). These photosensitizers in a micromolar concentration can induce a >4–5 log decrease in the microbial population after incubation times as short as 5–10 minutes and irradiation under mild experimental conditions, such as fluence‐rates around 50 mW/cm 2 and irradiation times shorter than 15 minutes. Conclusions: PDT appears to represent an efficacious alternative modality for the treatment of localized microbial infections through the in situ application of the photosensitizer followed by irradiation of the photosensitizer‐loaded infected area. Proposed clinical fields of interest of antimicrobial PDT include the treatment of chronic ulcers, infected burns, acne vulgaris, and a variety of oral infections. Lasers Surg. Med. 38:468–481, 2006. © 2006 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Gunaydin, G., Gedik, M. E., & Ayan, S. (2021) · Frontiers in Chemistry · doi:10.3389/fchem.2021.686303 · Cited by 402
Photosensitizers in antibacterial photodynamic therapy: an overview
Ghorbani, J., Rahban, D., Aghamiri, S., Teymouri, A., & Bahador, A. (2018) · LASER THERAPY · doi:10.5978/islsm.27_18-ra-01 · Cited by 365
Photodynamic therapy in the control of oral biofilms
Soukos, N. S., & Goodson, J. M. (2011) · Periodontology 2000 · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0757.2010.00346.x · Cited by 342
Antimicrobial Effect of Photodynamic Therapy Using a Highly Pure Chlorin E6
Park, J.-H., Moon, Y.-H., Bang, I.-S., Kim, Y.-C., Kim, S.-A., Ahn, S.-G., & Yoon, J.-H. (2010) · Lasers in Medical Science · doi:10.1007/s10103-010-0781-1 · Cited by 78
Photo-induced protein oxidation: mechanisms, consequences and medical applications
Fuentes-Lemus, E., & López-Alarcón, C. (2020) · Essays in Biochemistry · doi:10.1042/ebc20190044 · Cited by 29
Metadata
- Authors
- Jori, G., Fabris, C., Soncin, M., Ferro, S., Coppellotti, O., Dei, D., Fantetti, L., Chiti, G., & Roncucci, G.
- Venue
- Lasers in Surgery and Medicine
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-06
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 468-481
- ISSN
- 0196-8092 (ISSN-L)
- 1096-9101
- OpenAlex
- W1975320008
- Cited by
- 827
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 19.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Photodynamic therapy in the treatment of microbial infections: Basic principles and perspective applications. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/lsm.20361
- The paper
- Jori, G., Fabris, C., Soncin, M., Ferro, S., Coppellotti, O., Dei, D., Fantetti, L., Chiti, G., & Roncucci, G. (2006). Photodynamic therapy in the treatment of microbial infections: Basic principles and perspective applications. Lasers in Surgery and Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1002/lsm.20361
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.