Cited by 23Reconstructive Facial Surgery TechniquesNasal Surgery and Airway StudiesDermatologic Treatments and Research

Cartilage reshaping for protruding ears: a prospective long term follow-up of 32 procedures.

Leclère, Franck Marie P., Trelles, Mario, Mordon, Serge R.·2011·Lasers in Surgery and Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Correction of prominent ears is a common plastic surgical procedure. We introduced a new non-invasive laser-assisted cartilage reshaping (LACR) technique as an alternative to invasive surgical otoplasty. METHODS: Since our first report in 2006, 32 LACR procedures in 17 patients have been performed at the Antoni De Gimbernat Foundation in collaboration with the French National Institute of Health and Medical Research (INSERM) U703. For 15 patients, the procedure was bilateral, for the remaining 2 patients LACR was performed only on one side. The treatment consisted of seven stacked pulses (3 ms, 2 Hz, 84 J/cm(2) cumulative fluence) applied using a 4-mm spot hand piece. Early and late complications were defined and reviewed for the whole series. Satisfaction was assessed by the patients using a visual analogue scale from 0 (unsatisfied) to 10 (highly satisfied). The superior and middle cephaloauricular distances were prospectively evaluated. RESULTS: Except for two cases of dermatitis, there were no early complications and no late complications (like keloids) in the series. The mean superior and middle cephaloauricular distances were, respectively, 12.3 ± 1.9 and 13.7 ± 1.6 mm compared to 17.8 ± 3.1 mm (p < 0.01) and 23.9 ± 1.9 mm (p < 0.01) before operation. Mean patient satisfaction was 8.6/10 with all patients reporting that they would be willing to undergo the procedure again, if required. CONCLUSION: LACR appears to be a safe and reproducible method for the treatment of protruding ears. Other applications of this technique, like laser assisted septal cartilage reshaping (LASCR) for septum deviation, have been recently described.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/lsm.21126

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • LACR studies on 1.54-μm erbium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet and Er/Glass lasers report stable reshaping with few complications.

    “Studies on 1.54-μm erbium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet and Er/Glass lasers report stable reshaping with few complications,53,54”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Leclère, F. M. P., Trelles, M., & Mordon, S. R.
Affiliations
  • Inserm (FR)
  • Fundación Privada Escuelas Universitarias Gimbernat (ES)
Corresponding author
Mordon, Serge R.
Venue
Lasers in Surgery and Medicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-10-17
Volume
43
Issue
9
Pages
875-880
ISSN
  • 0196-8092 (ISSN-L)
  • 1096-9101
OpenAlex
W1969845934
Cited by
23
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4
FWCI
1.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Lasers in Surgery and Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • BORIS (University Library Bern) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Nasal Surgery and Airway Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Dermatologic Treatments and Research
Keywords
protruding ears, prominent ears, otoplasty, patient satisfaction, postoperative complications
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Ear Cartilage, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Time Factors, Plastic Surgery Procedures, Laser Therapy, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review