Functional and Morphological Comparison of Three Primary Liver Cell Types Cultured in the AMC Bioartificial Liver
Open accessAbstract
The selection of a cell type for bioartificial liver (BAL) systems for the treatment of patients with acute liver failure is in part determined by issues concerning patient safety and cell availability. Consequently, mature porcine hepatocytes (MPHs) have been widely applied in BAL systems. The success of clinical BAL application systems is, however, largely dependent on the functionality and stability of hepatocytes. Therefore, we compared herein the general metabolic and functional activities of MPHs with mature human hepatocytes (MHHs) in the Academic Medical Center (AMC)-BAL during a 7-day culture period. We also tested fetal human hepatocytes (FHHs), since their proliferation capacity is higher than MHHs and their function is increased compared to human liver cell lines. The results showed large differences between the 3 cell types. MHHs eliminated 2-fold more ammonia and produced 3-fold more urea than MPHs, whereas FHHs produced ammonia. Lidocaine elimination of FHHs was 3.5-fold higher than MPHs and 6.6-fold higher than of MHHs. Albumin production was not different between the 3 cell types. MPHs and FHHs became increasingly glycolytic, whereas MHHs remained metabolically stable during the whole culture period. MHHs and MPHs formed tissue-like structures inside the AMC-BAL. In conclusion, we propose that FHHs can be considered as a suitable cell type for pharmacological studies inside a bioreactor. However, we conclude that MHHs are the preferred cell source for loading a BAL device for clinical use, because of their high ammonia eliminating capacity and metabolic stability. MPHs should be considered as the best alternative cell source for BAL application, although their phenotypic instability urges application within 1 or 2 days after loading. Liver Transpl 13:589–598, 2007. © 2007 AASLD.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The main challenges regarding the use of human fetal hepatocytes are their availability, ethical concerns, and incomplete functional maturity of the fetal cells.
“The main challenges regarding the use of human fetal hepatocytes are their availability, ethical concerns, and incomplete functional maturity of the fetal cells [207,208].”
From Liver tissue engineering using decellularized scaffolds: Current progress, challenges, and opportunities (2024) · cites this paper as [207]
Cites
Comparative metabolic capabilities of CYP3A4, CYP3A5, and CYP3A7
Williams, J. A., Ring, B. J., Cantrell, V. E., Jones, D. R., Eckstein, J., Ruterbories, K., Hamman, M. A., Hall, S. D., & Wrighton, S. A. (2002) · Drug Metabolism and Disposition · doi:10.1124/dmd.30.8.883 · Cited by 471 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Cell and tissue engineering for liver disease
Bhatia, S. N., Underhill, G. H., Zaret, K. S., & Fox, I. J. (2014) · Science Translational Medicine · doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.3005975 · Cited by 309 · see citing works
Use of Decellularized Porcine Liver for Engineering Humanized Liver Organ
Barakat, O., Abbasi, S., Rodriguez, G., Rios, J., Wood, R. P., Ozaki, C., Holley, L. S., & Gauthier, P. K. (2012) · Journal of Surgical Research · doi:10.1016/j.jss.2011.09.033 · Cited by 208 · see citing works
Liver tissue engineering and cell sources: issues and challenges
Palakkan, A. A., Hay, D. C., PR, A. K., TV, K., & Ross, J. A. (2013) · Liver International · doi:10.1111/liv.12134 · Cited by 130 · see citing works
Hussein, K. H., Ahmadzada, B., Correa, J. C., Sultan, A., Wilken, S., Amiot, B., & Nyberg, S. L. (2024) · Bioactive Materials · doi:10.1016/j.bioactmat.2024.06.001 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
“The main challenges regarding the use of human fetal hepatocytes are their availability, ethical concerns, and incomplete functional maturity of the fetal cells [207,208].”
Background
- Authors
- Poyck, P. P. C., Hoekstra, R., van Wijk, A. C. W. A., Attanasio, C., Calise, F., Chamuleau, R. A. F. M., & van Gulik, T. M.
- Affiliations
- Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam (NL)
- Ospedale Antonio Cardarelli (IT)
- Venue
- Liver Transplantation
- Published
- 2007-04
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 589-598
- ISSN
- 1527-6465 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2056487043
- Cited by
- 49
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 4.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Liver Transplantation (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
- Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver physiology and pathology
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › 3D Printing in Biomedical Research
- Keywords
- bioartificial liver, porcine hepatocytes, human hepatocytes, acute liver failure, ammonia removal, urea synthesis, lidocaine metabolism, albumin synthesis, glycolysis
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Animals, Female, Hepatectomy, Humans, Liver, Liver Diseases, Liver Neoplasms, Male, Middle Aged, Swine, Liver Failure, Acute, Cell Culture Techniques, Liver, Artificial, Models, Animal
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review