The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Validation of a current definition of early allograft dysfunction in liver transplant recipients and analysis of risk factors
Open accessAbstract
Translational studies in liver transplantation often require an endpoint of graft function or dysfunction beyond graft loss. Prior definitions of early allograft dysfunction (EAD) vary, and none have been validated in a large multicenter population in the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) era. We examined an updated definition of EAD to validate previously used criteria, and correlated this definition with graft and patient outcome. We performed a cohort study of 300 deceased donor liver transplants at 3 U.S. programs. EAD was defined as the presence of one or more of the following previously defined postoperative laboratory analyses reflective of liver injury and function: bilirubin ≥10mg/dL on day 7, international normalized ratio ≥1.6 on day 7, and alanine or aspartate aminotransferases >2000 IU/L within the first 7 days. To assess predictive validity, the EAD definition was tested for association with graft and patient survival. Risk factors for EAD were assessed using multivariable logistic regression. Overall incidence of EAD was 23.2%. Most grafts met the definition with increased bilirubin at day 7 or high levels of aminotransferases. Of recipients meeting the EAD definition, 18.8% died, as opposed to 1.8% of recipients without EAD (relative risk = 10.7 [95% confidence interval: 3.6, 31.9] P < 0.0001). More recipients with EAD lost their grafts (26.1%) than recipients with no EAD (3.5%) (relative risk = 7.4 [95% confidence interval: 3.4, 16.3] P < 0.0001). Donor age and MELD score were significant EAD risk factors in a multivariate model. In summary a simple definition of EAD using objective posttransplant criteria identified a 23% incidence, and was highly associated with graft loss and patient mortality, validating previously published criteria. This definition can be used as an endpoint in translational studies aiming to identify mechanistic pathways leading to a subgroup of liver grafts with clinical expression of suboptimal function. Liver Transpl 16:943-949, 2010. © 2010 AASLD.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.
Hanley, J. A., & McNeil, B. J. (1982) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiology.143.1.7063747 · Cited by 21,856
Simulation Study of Confounder-Selection Strategies
Maldonado, G., & Greenland, S. (1993) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a116813 · Cited by 2,491
Characteristics Associated with Liver Graft Failure: The Concept of a Donor Risk Index
Feng, S., Goodrich, N. P., Bragg-Gresham, J. L., Dykstra, D. M., Punch, J. D., DebRoy, M. A., Greenstein, S. M., & Merion, R. M. (2006) · American Journal of Transplantation · doi:10.1111/j.1600-6143.2006.01242.x · Cited by 1,958
A REVIEW OF GOODNESS OF FIT STATISTICS FOR USE IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF LOGISTIC REGRESSION MODELS1
LEMESHOW, S., & HOSMER, D. W. (1982) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113284 · Cited by 1,947
RISK FACTORS FOR PRIMARY DYSFUNCTION AFTER LIVER TRANSPLANTATION—A MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS
PLOEG, R. J., DʼALESSANDRO, A. M., KNECHTLE, S. J., STEGALL, M. D., PIRSCH, J. D., HOFFMANN, R. M., SASAKI, T., SOLLINGER, H. W., BELZER, F. O., & KALAYOGLU, M. (1993) · Transplantation · doi:10.1097/00007890-199304000-00024 · Cited by 1,026
Organ Donation and Utilization in the United States, 1996–2005
Punch, J. D., Hayes, D. H., LaPorte, F. B., McBride, V., & Seely, M. S. (2007) · American Journal of Transplantation · doi:10.1111/j.1600-6143.2007.01779.x · Cited by 600
Results of the first year of the new liver allocation plan
Freeman, R. B., Wiesner, R. H., Edwards, E., Harper, A., Merion, R., & Wolfe, R. (2004) · Liver Transplantation · doi:10.1002/lt.20024 · Cited by 434
Characteristics Associated with Liver Graft Failure: The Concept of a Donor Risk Index
Fenga, S. (2006) · Cited by 364
Liver and Intestine Transplantation in the United States, 1997–2006
Freeman, R. B., Steffick, D. E., Guidinger, M. K., Farmer, D. G., Berg, C. L., & Merion, R. M. (2008) · American Journal of Transplantation · doi:10.1111/j.1600-6143.2008.02174.x · Cited by 333
Schaubel, D. E., Sima, C. S., Goodrich, N. P., Feng, S., & Merion, R. M. (2008) · American Journal of Transplantation · doi:10.1111/j.1600-6143.2007.02086.x · Cited by 328
Cited by
A randomized trial of normothermic preservation in liver transplantation
for the Consortium for Organ Preservation in Europe, Nasralla, D., Coussios, C. C., Mergental, H., Akhtar, M. Z., Butler, A. J., Ceresa, C. D. L., Chiocchia, V., Dutton, S. J., García-Valdecasas, J. C., et al. (2018) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-018-0047-9 · Cited by 1,199
The Role of Complement in Liver Injury, Regeneration, and Transplantation
Thorgersen, E. B., Barratt‐Due, A., Haugaa, H., Harboe, M., Pischke, S. E., Nilsson, P. H., & Mollnes, T. E. (2019) · Hepatology · doi:10.1002/hep.30508 · Cited by 240
Metadata
- Authors
- Olthoff, K. M., Kulik, L., Samstein, B., Kaminski, M., Abecassis, M., Emond, J., Shaked, A., & Christie, J. D.
- Venue
- Liver Transplantation
- Published
- 2010-08
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 943-949
- ISSN
- 1527-6465 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2031915073
- Cited by
- 1,256
- References
- 18
- FWCI
- 13.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Validation of a current definition of early allograft dysfunction in liver transplant recipients and analysis of risk factors. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/lt.22091
- The paper
- Olthoff, K. M., Kulik, L., Samstein, B., Kaminski, M., Abecassis, M., Emond, J., Shaked, A., & Christie, J. D. (2010). Validation of a current definition of early allograft dysfunction in liver transplant recipients and analysis of risk factors. Liver Transplantation. https://doi.org/10.1002/lt.22091
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.