The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Survival Benefit of Deceased Donor Liver Transplantation as a Function of Candidate Disease Severity and Donor Quality
Open accessAbstract
The survival benefit of liver transplantation depends on candidate disease severity, as measured by MELD score. However, donor liver quality may also affect survival benefit. Using US data from the SRTR on 28 165 adult liver transplant candidates wait-listed between 2001 and 2005, we estimated survival benefit according to cross-classifications of candidate MELD score and deceased donor risk index (DRI) using sequential stratification. Covariate-adjusted hazard ratios (HR) were calculated for each liver transplant recipient at a given MELD with an organ of a given DRI, comparing posttransplant mortality to continued wait-listing with possible later transplantation using a lower-DRI organ. High-DRI organs were more often transplanted into lower-MELD recipients and vice versa. Compared to waiting for a lower-DRI organ, the lowest-MELD category recipients (MELD 6-8) who received high-DRI organs experienced significantly higher mortality (HR = 3.70; p < 0.0005). All recipients with MELD > or =20 had a significant survival benefit from transplantation, regardless of DRI. Transplantation of high-DRI organs is effective for high but not low-MELD candidates. Pairing of high-DRI livers with lower-MELD candidates fails to maximize survival benefit and may deny lifesaving organs to high-MELD candidates who are at high risk of death without transplantation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Malinchoc, M., Kamath, P. S., Gordon, F. D., Peine, C. J., Rank, J., & ter Borg, P. C. J. (2000) · Hepatology · doi:10.1053/he.2000.5852 · Cited by 2,893
Cited by
Olthoff, K. M., Kulik, L., Samstein, B., Kaminski, M., Abecassis, M., Emond, J., Shaked, A., & Christie, J. D. (2010) · Liver Transplantation · doi:10.1002/lt.22091 · Cited by 1,256
Briceño, J., Cruz-Ramírez, M., Prieto, M., Navasa, M., Ortiz de Urbina, J., Orti, R., Gómez-Bravo, M.-Á., Otero, A., Varo, E., Tomé, S., et al. (2014) · Journal of Hepatology · doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2014.05.039 · Cited by 152
Metadata
- Authors
- Schaubel, D. E., Sima, C. S., Goodrich, N. P., Feng, S., & Merion, R. M.
- Venue
- American Journal of Transplantation
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2008-02
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 419-425
- ISSN
- 1600-6135 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2113041255
- Cited by
- 328
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 29.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Survival Benefit of Deceased Donor Liver Transplantation as a Function of Candidate Disease Severity and Donor Quality. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1600-6143.2007.02086.x
- The paper
- Schaubel, D. E., Sima, C. S., Goodrich, N. P., Feng, S., & Merion, R. M. (2008). The Survival Benefit of Deceased Donor Liver Transplantation as a Function of Candidate Disease Severity and Donor Quality. American Journal of Transplantation. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-6143.2007.02086.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.