Cited by 70Media, Gender, and AdvertisingConsumer Perception and Purchasing BehaviorMedia Influence and Health

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

When will larger‐sized female models in advertisements be viewed positively? The moderating effects of instructional frame, gender, and need for cognition

Peck, Joann, Loken, Barbara·2004·Psychology & Marketing

Abstract

Abstract A variety of negative consequences for girls and women have been associated with women's and men's viewing unrealistic portrayals of women in advertising. However, research on the positive consequences of presenting larger‐sized women in advertisements, and the conditions under which they are effective, has been lacking. The present research examined such positive effects and found that larger‐sized female models in ads were rated as more attractive when an instructional frame activated nontraditional beliefs (a new women's magazine that features larger‐sized models) than when it activated traditional beliefs (a traditional women's magazine). These effects were more pronounced for women than for men, and particularly for women who scored higher in their need for cognition. The degree to which women generated positive thoughts about themselves in response to the ads tended to correspond with their ratings of increased attractiveness of the models in the ads. Implications of findings for using positive larger‐sized female models in ads are discussed. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/mar.20012

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 38

  1. 10.2466/pms.1989.69.2.419 · DOI
  2. 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1999.tb02791.x · DOI
  3. 10.1086/209432 · DOI
  4. 10.1037/0022-3514.51.5.1032 · DOI
  5. 10.1111/j.1471-6402.1992.tb00240.x · DOI
  6. Courtney A. E., 1983, Sex stereotyping in advertising
  7. 10.1002/(SICI)1098-108X(199712)22:4<421::AID-EAT7>3.0.CO;2-O · DOI
  8. 10.1002/mar.4220050106 · DOI
  9. 10.1002/mar.10010 · DOI
  10. Everett M., 1990, Fat chance, Sales and Marketing Management, 142, 66
  11. 10.1542/peds.107.1.54 · DOI
  12. Gagnard A., 1986, From feast to famine: Depiction of ideal body type in magazine advertising: 1950–1984, Proceedings of the American Academy of Advertising, 27, 461
  13. 10.1007/BF00287260 · DOI
  14. 10.1056/NEJM199309303291406 · DOI
  15. 10.1007/BF01544592 · DOI
  16. 10.3109/07853899908998794 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1997.tb02692.x · DOI
  18. 10.1016/S1057-7408(08)80038-1 · DOI
  19. 10.1086/209194 · DOI
  20. 10.2466/pms.1990.71.2.519 · DOI
  21. 10.1037/0022-3514.38.2.203 · DOI
  22. 10.1037/0022-3514.38.1.131 · DOI
  23. 10.1037/0022-3514.55.1.5 · DOI
  24. 10.1086/209550 · DOI
  25. 10.1177/01461672992511012 · DOI
  26. 10.1002/mar.4220100605 · DOI
  27. Petty R. E., 1986, 123, 10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60214-2 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Pingitore R., 1994, Bias against overweight job applicant in a simulated employment interview, Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 909, 10.1037/0021-9010.79.6.909 · DOI
  29. 10.2307/1251597 · DOI
  30. 10.1086/209242 · DOI · Paper page
  31. 10.1006/jesp.1995.1022 · DOI
  32. Seid R. P., 1989, Never too thin: Why women are at war with their bodies
  33. 10.1007/BF00287452 · DOI
  34. 10.1521/jscp.1994.13.3.288 · DOI
  35. 10.1016/0191-8869(92)90215-B · DOI
  36. Weiss E., 1990, Perceived self‐inflictions and evaluation of obese and handicapped persons, Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1268
  37. Wolf N., 1991, The beauty myth: How images of beauty are used against women
  38. Ziolkowski S. M., 1994, The status of weight‐based employment discrimination under the Americans with Disabilities Act after Cook v, Rhode Island, Retardation, an

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 70

Metadata

Authors
Peck, J., & Loken, B.
Affiliations
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
  • University of Minnesota (US)
Corresponding author
Peck, Joann
Venue
Psychology & Marketing
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-04-23
Volume
21
Issue
6
Pages
425-442
ISSN
  • 0742-6046 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-6793
OpenAlex
W2160646955
Cited by
70
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 1
FWCI
6.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Psychology and Marketing (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Media, Gender, and Advertising
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Perception and Purchasing Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Media Influence and Health
Keywords
body image, advertising, gender differences, need for cognition, traditional beliefs, women's magazines, self-esteem, attractiveness ratings

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review