The DOI matches its Crossref record; 55 of the 55 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Consumer Decision Making Regarding a “Green” Everyday Product
Abstract
One of the techniques marketers use to convert low‐involvement products into high‐involvement ones is adding an important product feature. A case in point is the common practice of adding a “green” or environmentally friendly product feature to an everyday product, something which is often assumed to elevate consumer involvement in the choice of the product. However, there is a lack of research investigating whether adding such a “green” product attribute actually makes any difference to how consumers make choices. Does the way in which consumers make decisions about groceries change when both “green” and conventional alternatives are available? Does it make them deliberate more or do they just develop another, simple choice heuristic? Based on observation and follow‐up interviews of consumers at the milk counter in two supermarkets which stock both organic (a “green” attribute) and conventional milk, it is concluded that, rather than changing the way consumers make decisions when buying this type of product, the availability of a “green” alternative seems to make “green” consumers develop a new, simple choice heuristic that allows them to do their shopping as effortless and time‐efficient as consumers buying conventional products.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173 · Cited by 91,532
Marketing management: analysis. planning. implementation and control
Kotler, P. (2000) · Cited by 6,639
(1999) · Cited by 6,104
Measuring the involvement construct
Zaichkowsky, J. L. (1985) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/208520 · Cited by 6,013
Ouellette, J. A., & Wood, W. (1998) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.124.1.54 · Cited by 3,480
BUSINESS RESEARCH METHODS (PHƯƠNG PHÁP NGHIÊN CỨU TRONG KINH DOANH)
Le, H. V., & T. T. T., A. (2023) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4488860 · Cited by 2,550
Sustainable food consumption: Exploring the consumer “attitude–behavioral intention” gap
Vermeir, I., & Verbeke, W. (2006) · Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10806-005-5485-3 · Cited by 2,524
Personal involvement as a determinant of argument-based persuasion.
Petty, R. E., Cacioppo, J. T., & Goldman, R. (1981) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.41.5.847 · Cited by 1,930
Determinants of Chinese consumers' green purchase behavior
Chan, R. Y. K. (2001) · Psychology & Marketing · doi:10.1002/mar.1013 · Cited by 1,220
Padel, S., & Foster, C. (2005) · British Food Journal · doi:10.1108/00070700510611002 · Cited by 1,214
Cited by
Thinking green, buying green? Drivers of pro-environmental purchasing behavior
Moser, A. K. (2015) · Journal of Consumer Marketing · doi:10.1108/jcm-10-2014-1179 · Cited by 657
Barbarossa, C., & De Pelsmacker, P. (2016) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-014-2425-z · Cited by 472
Mohd Suki, N. (2016) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.087 · Cited by 377
A systematic review of drivers influencing consumer willingness to pay for organic food
Katt, F., & Meixner, O. (2020) · Trends in Food Science & Technology · doi:10.1016/j.tifs.2020.04.029 · Cited by 298
Zhou, Y., Thøgersen, J., Ruan, Y., & Huang, G. (2013) · Journal of Consumer Marketing · doi:10.1108/jcm-02-2013-0482 · Cited by 269
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Thøgersen, J., Jørgensen, A., & Sandager, S.
- Venue
- Psychology & Marketing
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-03-29
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 187-197
- ISSN
- 0742-6046 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6793
- OpenAlex
- W1926860845
- Cited by
- 252
- References
- 55
- FWCI
- 40.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Consumer Decision Making Regarding a “Green” Everyday Product. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/mar.20514
- The paper
- Thøgersen, J., Jørgensen, A., & Sandager, S. (2012). Consumer Decision Making Regarding a “Green” Everyday Product. Psychology & Marketing. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20514
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.