Personal involvement as a determinant of argument-based persuasion.

Richard E. Petty, John T. Cacioppo, Rachel Goldman·1981·Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Abstract

It was suggested that there are two basic routes to persuasion. One route is based on the thoughtful consideration of arguments central to the issue, whereas the other is based on peripheral cues in the persuasion situation. To test this view, undergraduates expressed their attitudes on an issue after exposure to a counterattitudinal advocacy containing either strong or weak arguments that emanated from a source of either high or low expertise. For some subjects, the communication was high in personal relevance, whereas for others it was low. Interactions of the personal relevance manipulation with the argument quality and expertise manipulations revealed that under high relevance, attitudes were influenced primarily by the quality of the arguments in the message, whereas under low relevance, attitudes were influenced primarily by the expertise of the source. This suggests that the personal relevance of an issue is one determinant of the route to persuasion that will be followed.

Cites (6)

  1. Levels of processing: A framework for memory research
    Craik, Fergus I.M., Lockhart, Robert S. · 1972 · Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior
  2. Experimental Design: Procedures for the Behavioral Sciences
    Kirk, Roger · 2013
  3. Controlled and automatic human information processing: I. Detection, search, and attention.
    Schneider, Walter, Shiffrin, Richard M. · 1977 · Psychological Review
  4. “The Need for Cognition.”
    Cacioppo, John T., Petty, Richard E. · 1982 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
  5. Effects of message repetition and position on cognitive response, recall, and persuasion.
    Cacioppo, John T., Petty, Richard E. · 1979 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
  6. Effects of rhetorical questions on persuasion: A cognitive response analysis.
    Petty, Richard E., Cacioppo, John T., Heesacker, Martin · 1981 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Show all 6 references

Cited by (57)

  1. The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion
    Petty, Richard E., Cacioppo, John T. · 1986 · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology
  2. Measuring the involvement construct
    Zaichkowsky, Judith Lynne · 1985 · Journal of Consumer Research
  3. Central and Peripheral Routes to Advertising Effectiveness: The Moderating Role of Involvement
    Petty, Richard E., Cacioppo, John T., Schumann, David · 1983 · Journal of Consumer Research
  4. The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion
    Petty, Richard E., Cacioppo, John T. · 1986 · Communication and Persuasion
  5. Maximizing business returns to corporate social responsibility (CSR): The role of CSR communication
    Du, Shuili, Bhattacharya, C.B., Sen, Sankar · 2010 · International Journal of Management Reviews

See all 1,930

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Personal involvement as a determinant of argument-based persuasion. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0022-3514.41.5.847
The paper
Petty, R. E., Cacioppo, J. T., & Goldman, R. (1981). Personal involvement as a determinant of argument-based persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.41.5.847

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.