The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Memorable tourism experience: A review and research agenda
Open accessAbstract
A decade of research has produced substantial results but the theorization of memorable tourism experience, often drawing on positive and environmental psychology, remains fuzzy and fragmented. Adopting state‐of‐the art practices, this study systematically reviews, synthesizes, and integrates the extant body of knowledge across multiple literature streams on memorable tourism experience. Our review indicates that research in this field has a geographical bias, largely neglects negative experiences, and mainly employs quantitative methods. We identify several gaps in the literature and propose the following seven recommendations for future research: (1) caution when using the memorable tourism experience scale; (2) the need for cross‐cultural studies; (3) positive and negative dimensions in conceptualizing memorable tourism experience; (4) overcoming the limitations of self‐report measures; (5) engaging in mixed methods research; (6) integrating suppliers' perspectives; and (7) combining theories, concepts, and disciplines. This study serves as a foundation for researchers and provides a holistic understanding of memorable tourism experience.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Using thematic analysis in psychology
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006) · Qualitative Research in Psychology · doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa · Cited by 194,414
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & the PRISMA Group* (2009) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135 · Cited by 37,554
PRISMA-P Group, Moher, D., Shamseer, L., Clarke, M., Ghersi, D., Liberati, A., Petticrew, M., Shekelle, P., & Stewart, L. A. (2015) · Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1186/2046-4053-4-1 · Cited by 26,223
SERVQUAL: A multiple-Item Scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality
Parasuraman, A., Berry, L. L., & Zeithaml, V. A. (1988) · Zenodo · doi:10.5281/zenodo.14579729 · Cited by 21,118
Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines
Snyder, H. (2019) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039 · Cited by 11,524
Mixed Methods Research: A Research Paradigm Whose Time Has Come
Johnson, R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x033007014 · Cited by 11,170
Baumeister, R. F., Bratslavsky, E., Finkenauer, C., & Vohs, K. D. (2001) · Review of General Psychology · doi:10.1037/1089-2680.5.4.323 · Cited by 7,678
Understanding customer experience throughout the customer journey
Lemon, K. N., & Verhoef, P. C. (2016) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jm.15.0420 · Cited by 5,765
Episodic memory: from mind to brain
Tulving, E. (2002) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135114 · Cited by 4,950
Ito, T. A., Larsen, J. T., Smith, N. K., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1998) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.75.4.887 · Cited by 1,340
(2000) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780195122657.001.0001 · Cited by 1,340
Review articles: purpose, process, and structure
Palmatier, R. W., Houston, M. B., & Hulland, J. (2018) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/s11747-017-0563-4 · Cited by 1,051
Kim, J.-H. (2018) · Journal of Travel Research · doi:10.1177/0047287517721369 · Cited by 679
Emotions elicited by local food consumption, memories, place attachment and behavioural intentions
Sthapit, E., Björk, P., & Coudounaris, D. N. (2017) · Anatolia · doi:10.1080/13032917.2017.1322111 · Cited by 167
Self-citation
Cited by
Experience management in hospitality and tourism: reflections and implications for future research
Agapito, D., & Sigala, M. (2024) · International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management · doi:10.1108/ijchm-11-2023-1722 · Cited by 76
Huang, R., & Bu, H.-M. (2022) · Psychology Research and Behavior Management · doi:10.2147/prbm.s387241 · Cited by 56
“Therefore, the study of the dimensions of MTEs has become one of the important topics in this research field.(42) Although current studies have not formed a unified understanding of the dimensions of MTEs, they can be generally divided into two types of dimensions: personal psychological factors and destination attrib…”
BackgroundKeskin, E., Yayla, O., Sezen, N., & Dedeoğlu, B. B. (2024) · Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Insights · doi:10.1108/jhti-10-2023-0703 · Cited by 23
Metadata
- Authors
- Hosany, S., Sthapit, E., & Björk, P.
- Venue
- Psychology & Marketing
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2022-04-04
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1467-1486
- ISSN
- 0742-6046 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6793
- OpenAlex
- W4226337278
- Cited by
- 331
- References
- 14
- FWCI
- 84.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
