Cited by 1,051Academic Writing and PublishingMeta-analysis and systematic reviewsPublishing and Scholarly Communication

Review articles: purpose, process, and structure

Open access
Palmatier, Robert W., Houston, Mark B., Hulland, John·2018·Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11747-017-0563-4

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A structured review is an effective method for summarizing existing research in a field because it follows specific guidelines and can be replicated by future researchers.

    “A structured review uses a structured approach to present a synthesized overview of the extant literature on a domain or a topic. It is an effective method for summarizing existing research in a field because it follows specific guidelines and can be replicated by future researchers (Palmatier et al., 2018).”

    From Electronic shopping cart abandonment: What do we know and where should we be heading? (2024) · cites this paper as Palmatier et al., 2018

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Bettencourt, L. A., & Houston, M. B. (2001). Assessing the impact of article method type and subject area on citation frequency and ref- erence diversity. Marketing Letters, 12(4), 327-340.
  2. Cleeren, K., Dekimpe, M. G., & van Heerde, H. J. (2017). Marketing research on product-harm crises: a review, managerial implications. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 45(5), 593-615.
  3. Grewal, D., Puccinelli, N. M., & Monroe, K. B. (2018). Meta-analysis: error cancels and truth accrues. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 46(1).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Palmatier, R. W., Houston, M. B., & Hulland, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Washington (US)
  • Texas Christian University (US)
  • University of Georgia (US)
Corresponding author
Palmatier, Robert W.
Venue
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science
Published
2017-10-02
Volume
46
Issue
1
Pages
1-5
ISSN
  • 0092-0703 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-7824
OpenAlex
W2761394648
Cited by
1,051
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 132 · 2025: 179 · 2024: 190 · 2023: 198 · 2022: 138 · 2021: 113 · 2020: 61 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 3
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Academic Writing and Publishing
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Publishing and Scholarly Communication
Keywords
academic writing, article structure, writing process, market analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review