The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The role of electron capture dissociation in biomolecular analysis
Abstract
The introduction of electron capture dissociation (ECD) to electrospray (ESI) Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry (FT‐ICR MS) constitutes a significant advance in the structural analysis of biomolecules. The fundamental features and benefits of ECD are discussed in this review. ECD is currently unique to FT‐ICR MS and the fundamentals of that technique are outlined. The advantages and complementarity of ECD in relation to other tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) techniques, such as infrared multiphoton dissociation (IRMPD) and sustained off‐resonance collision‐induced dissociation (SORI‐CID), are discussed. The instrumental considerations associated with implementation of ECD, including activated ion techniques and coupling to on‐line separation techniques, are covered, as are the allied processes electronic excitation dissociation (EED), electron detachment dissociation (EDD), and hot electron capture (HECD). A major theme of this review is the role of ECD in proteomics, particularly for characterization of post‐translational modifications (phosphorylation, glycosylation, carboxyglutamic acid, sulfation, acylation, and methionine oxidation) and the top‐down approach to protein identification. The application of ECD to the analysis of polymers, peptide nucleic acids, and oligonucleotides is also discussed. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc., Mass Spec Rev 24:201–222, 2005
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Deciphering the biology of Mycobacterium tuberculosis from the complete genome sequence
Cole, S. T., Brosch, R., Parkhill, J., Garnier, T., Churcher, C., Harris, D., Gordon, S. V., Eiglmeier, K., Gas, S., Barry, C. E., et al. (1998) · Nature · doi:10.1038/31159 · Cited by 7,847
Electrospray Ionization for Mass Spectrometry of Large Biomolecules
Fenn, J. B., Mann, M., Meng, C. K., Wong, S. F., & Whitehouse, C. M. (1989) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.2675315 · Cited by 7,634
Cited by
A systematic approach to protein glycosylation analysis: a path through the maze
Mariño, K., Bones, J., Kattla, J. J., & Rudd, P. M. (2010) · Nature Chemical Biology · doi:10.1038/nchembio.437 · Cited by 628
Phosphopeptide fragmentation and analysis by mass spectrometry
Boersema, P. J., Mohammed, S., & Heck, A. J. R. (2009) · Journal of Mass Spectrometry · doi:10.1002/jms.1599 · Cited by 362
Weerapana, E., Speers, A. E., & Cravatt, B. F. (2007) · Nature Protocols · doi:10.1038/nprot.2007.194 · Cited by 276
Top‐down proteomics in health and disease: Challenges and opportunities
Gregorich, Z. R., & Ge, Y. (2014) · PROTEOMICS · doi:10.1002/pmic.201300432 · Cited by 217
Zhang, J., Guy, M. J., Norman, H. S., Chen, Y.-C., Xu, Q., Dong, X., Guner, H., Wang, S., Kohmoto, T., Young, K. H., et al. (2011) · Journal of Proteome Research · doi:10.1021/pr200258m · Cited by 194
Metadata
- Authors
- Cooper, H. J., Håkansson, K., & Marshall, A. G.
- Venue
- Mass Spectrometry Reviews
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-07-02
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 201-222
- ISSN
- 0277-7037 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-2787
- OpenAlex
- W2086482125
- Cited by
- 514
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 14.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The role of electron capture dissociation in biomolecular analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/mas.20014
- The paper
- Cooper, H. J., Håkansson, K., & Marshall, A. G. (2005). The role of electron capture dissociation in biomolecular analysis. Mass Spectrometry Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1002/mas.20014
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.