Cited by 276Advanced Proteomics Techniques and ApplicationsClick Chemistry and ApplicationsMass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications

Tandem orthogonal proteolysis-activity-based protein profiling (TOP-ABPP)—a general method for mapping sites of probe modification in proteomes

Weerapana, Eranthie, Speers, Anna E, Cravatt, Benjamin F·2007·Nature Protocols

Abstract

Activity-based protein profiling (ABPP) utilizes active site-directed chemical probes to monitor the functional state of enzymes directly in native biological systems. Identification of the specific sites of probe labeling on enzymes remains a major challenge in ABPP experiments. In this protocol, we describe an advanced ABPP platform that utilizes a tandem orthogonal proteolysis (TOP) strategy coupled with mass spectrometric analysis to simultaneously identify probe-labeled proteins together with their exact sites of probe modification. Elucidation of probe modification sites reveals fundamental insights into the molecular basis of specific probe-protein interactions. The TOP-ABPP method can be applied to any type of proteomic sample, including those derived from in vitro or in vivo labeling experiments, and is compatible with a variety of chemical probe structures. Completion of the entire protocol, including chemical synthesis of key reagents, requires approximately 8-10 days.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nprot.2007.194

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the first isoTOP-ABPP reports, an iodoacetamide probe carrying an alkyne handle was used to identify hyper-reactive cysteines across the proteome.

    “In the first reports of the isoTOP-ABPP (isotopic tandem orthogonal proteolysis–activity-based protein profiling) approach, an iodoacetamide probe functionalized with an alkyne handle was used to identify hyper-reactive cysteines across the proteome176,177”

    From Advances in covalent drug discovery (2022) · cites this paper as [176]

  • Recent activity-based protein profiling approaches use mass spectrometry and broadly reactive chemical probes to map allosteric sites in addition to active sites.

    “Instead of focusing on active sites, more recent ABPP approaches use MS and broadly reactive chemical probes to also map allosteric sites176.”

    From Advances in covalent drug discovery (2022) · cites this paper as [176]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Weerapana, E., Speers, A. E., & Cravatt, B. F.
Affiliations
Scripps Research Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Cravatt, Benjamin F
Venue
Nature Protocols
Published
2007-05-31
Volume
2
Issue
6
Pages
1414-1425
ISSN
  • 1750-2799 (ISSN-L)
  • 1754-2189
OpenAlex
W1975857707
Cited by
276
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 14
FWCI
3.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature Protocols (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Cancer Institute (R01CA087660)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Click Chemistry and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications
Keywords
activity-based protein profiling, site mapping, chemical probes, enzyme activity, mass spectrometry, proteomics
MeSH terms
Animals, Biotin, Myocardium, Protein Conformation, Molecular Probes, Proteome, Gene Expression Profiling, Proteomics, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review