The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Advances in proteomics data analysis and display using an accurate mass and time tag approach
Open accessAbstract
Proteomics has recently demonstrated utility for increasing the understanding of cellular processes on the molecular level as a component of systems biology approaches and for identifying potential biomarkers of various disease states. The large amount of data generated by utilizing high efficiency (e.g., chromatographic) separations coupled with high mass accuracy mass spectrometry for high‐throughput proteomics analyses presents challenges related to data processing, analysis, and display. This review focuses on recent advances in nanoLC‐FTICR‐MS‐based proteomics approaches and the accompanying data processing tools that have been developed to display and interpret the large volumes of data being produced. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc., Mass Spec Rev 25:450–482, 2006
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mass spectrometry-based proteomics
Aebersold, R., & Mann, M. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature01511 · Cited by 6,955
Quantitative analysis of complex protein mixtures using isotope-coded affinity tags
Gygi, S. P., Rist, B., Gerber, S. A., Turecek, F., Gelb, M. H., & Aebersold, R. (1999) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/13690 · Cited by 4,683
Peptide and protein sequence analysis by electron transfer dissociation mass spectrometry
Syka, J. E. P., Coon, J. J., Schroeder, M. J., Shabanowitz, J., & Hunt, D. F. (2004) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0402700101 · Cited by 2,370
Senko, M. W., Beu, S. C., & McLaffertycor, F. W. (1995) · Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · doi:10.1016/1044-0305(95)00017-8 · Cited by 451
Processing Complex Mixtures of Intact Proteins for Direct Analysis by Mass Spectrometry
Meng, F., Cargile, B. J., Patrie, S. M., Johnson, J. R., McLoughlin, S. M., & Kelleher, N. L. (2002) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac020049i · Cited by 183
Cited by
Protein biomarker discovery and validation: the long and uncertain path to clinical utility
Rifai, N., Gillette, M. A., & Carr, S. A. (2006) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt1235 · Cited by 1,867
Comparative analysis of proteome and transcriptome variation in mouse
Ghazalpour, A., Bennett, B., Petyuk, V. A., Orozco, L., Hagopian, R., Mungrue, I. N., Farber, C. R., Sinsheimer, J., Kang, H. M., Furlotte, N., et al. (2011) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1001393 · Cited by 624
“LC-MS datasets were analyzed by in-house software VIPER [38] that detected features in mass – elution time space and assigned them to peptides in AMT tag database as described elsewhere [39,40].”
MethodSelf-citationMass spectrometry-based proteomics: existing capabilities and future directions
Angel, T. E., Aryal, U. K., Hengel, S. M., Baker, E. S., Kelly, R. T., Robinson, E. W., & Smith, R. D. (2012) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c2cs15331a · Cited by 441
Self-citationZhang, Q., Ames, J. M., Smith, R. D., Baynes, J. W., & Metz, T. O. (2009) · Journal of Proteome Research · doi:10.1021/pr800858h · Cited by 421
Self-citationGillet, L. C., Leitner, A., & Aebersold, R. (2016) · Annual Review of Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev-anchem-071015-041535 · Cited by 323
Metadata
- Authors
- Zimmer, J. S. D., Monroe, M. E., Qian, W., & Smith, R. D.
- Venue
- Mass Spectrometry Reviews
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-01-20
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 450-482
- ISSN
- 0277-7037 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-2787
- OpenAlex
- W2101938218
- Cited by
- 304
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 14.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Advances in proteomics data analysis and display using an accurate mass and time tag approach. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/mas.20071
- The paper
- Zimmer, J. S. D., Monroe, M. E., Qian, W., & Smith, R. D. (2006). Advances in proteomics data analysis and display using an accurate mass and time tag approach. Mass Spectrometry Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1002/mas.20071
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
