The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Matrix effects in quantitative pesticide analysis using liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry
Abstract
Combined liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry using electrospray or atmospheric‐pressure chemical ionization has become an important tool in the quantitative analysis of pesticide residues in various matrices in relation to environmental analysis, food safety, and biological exposure monitoring. One of the major problems in the quantitative analysis using LC–MS is that compound and matrix‐dependent response suppression or enhancement may occur, the so‐called matrix effect. This article reviews issues related to matrix effects, focusing on quantitative pesticide analysis, but also paying attention to expertise with respect to matrix effects acquired in other application areas of LC–MS, especially quantitative bioanalysis in the course of drug development. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Malachová, A., Sulyok, M., Beltrán, E., Berthiller, F., & Krska, R. (2014) · Journal of Chromatography A · doi:10.1016/j.chroma.2014.08.037 · Cited by 444
Campos-Mañas, M. C., Plaza-Bolaños, P., Sánchez-Pérez, J. A., Malato, S., & Agüera, A. (2017) · Journal of Chromatography A · doi:10.1016/j.chroma.2017.05.053 · Cited by 136
Metadata
- Authors
- Niessen, W. M. A., Manini, P., & Andreoli, R.
- Venue
- Mass Spectrometry Reviews
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-06-16
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 881-899
- ISSN
- 0277-7037 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-2787
- OpenAlex
- W2078470673
- Cited by
- 435
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 32.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Matrix effects in quantitative pesticide analysis using liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/mas.20097
- The paper
- Niessen, W. M. A., Manini, P., & Andreoli, R. (2006). Matrix effects in quantitative pesticide analysis using liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry. Mass Spectrometry Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1002/mas.20097
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
