The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Optimization and validation of a quantitative liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometric method covering 295 bacterial and fungal metabolites including all regulated mycotoxins in four model food matrices
Open accessAbstract
An LC-MS/MS "dilute and shoot" method for the determination of 295 fungal and bacterial metabolites was optimized and validated according to the guidelines established in the Directorate General for Health and Consumer Affairs of the European Commission (SANCO) document No. 12495/2011. Four different types of food matrices were chosen for validation: apple puree for infants (high water content), hazelnuts (high fat content), maize (high starch and low fat content) and green pepper (difficult or unique matrix). Method accuracy and precision was evaluated using spiked samples in five replicates at two concentration levels. Method trueness was demonstrated through participation in various proficiency tests. Although the method covers a total number of 331 analytes, validation data were acquired only for 295 analytes, either due to the non-availability of analytical standards or due other reasons described in this paper. Concerning the apparent recovery, the percentage of 295 analytes matching the acceptable recovery range of 70-120% lied down by SANCO varied from 21% in green pepper to 74% in apple puree at the highest spiking level. At the levels close to limit of quantification only 20-58% of the analytes fulfilled this criterion. The extent of matrix effects was strongly dependent on the analyte/matrix combination. In general, the lowest matrix effects were observed in apple puree (59% of analytes were not influenced by enhancement/suppression at all at the highest validation level). The highest matrix effects were observed in green pepper, where only 10% of analytes did not suffer from signal suppression/enhancement. The repeatability of the method was acceptable (RSD≤20) for 97% of all analytes in apple puree and hazelnuts, for 95% in maize and for 89% in green pepper. Concerning the trueness of the method, Z-scores were generally between -2 and 2, despite a broad variety of different matrices. Based on these results it can be concluded that quantitative determination of mycotoxins by LC-MS/MS based on a "dilute and shoot" approach is also feasible in case of complex matrices.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Anastassiades, M., Lehotay, S. J., Štajnbaher, D., & Schenck, F. J. (2003) · Journal of AOAC INTERNATIONAL · doi:10.1093/jaoac/86.2.412 · Cited by 5,670
Shrivastava, A., & Gupta, V. (2011) · Chronicles of Young Scientists · doi:10.4103/2229-5186.79345 · Cited by 3,205
Bennett, J. W., & Klich, M. (2003) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.16.3.497-516.2003 · Cited by 3,127
Regulations relating to mycotoxins in food: Perspectives in a global and European context
van Egmond, H. P., Schothorst, R. C., & Jonker, M. A. (2007) · Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry · doi:10.1007/s00216-007-1317-9 · Cited by 738
Sulyok, M., Berthiller, F., Krska, R., & Schuhmacher, R. (2006) · Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry · doi:10.1002/rcm.2640 · Cited by 681
Self-citationMatrix effects in quantitative pesticide analysis using liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry
Niessen, W. M. A., Manini, P., & Andreoli, R. (2006) · Mass Spectrometry Reviews · doi:10.1002/mas.20097 · Cited by 435
Mol, H. G. J., Plaza-Bolaños, P., Zomer, P., de Rijk, T. C., Stolker, A. A. M., & Mulder, P. P. J. (2008) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac801557f · Cited by 431
Sulyok, M., Krska, R., & Schuhmacher, R. (2007) · Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry · doi:10.1007/s00216-007-1542-2 · Cited by 409
Self-citationKrska, R., Schubert-Ullrich, P., Molinelli, A., Sulyok, M., MacDonald, S., & Crews, C. (2008) · Food Additives & Contaminants: Part A · doi:10.1080/02652030701765723 · Cited by 350
Self-citationKmellár, B., Fodor, P., Pareja, L., Ferrer, C., Martínez-Uroz, M. A., Valverde, A., & Fernandez-Alba, A. R. (2008) · Journal of Chromatography A · doi:10.1016/j.chroma.2008.10.121 · Cited by 327
Cited by
Sulyok, M., Stadler, D., Steiner, D., & Krska, R. (2020) · Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry · doi:10.1007/s00216-020-02489-9 · Cited by 253
Self-citationT-2 and HT-2 Toxins: Toxicity, Occurrence and Analysis: A Review
Meneely, J., Greer, B., Kolawole, O., & Elliott, C. (2023) · Toxins · doi:10.3390/toxins15080481 · Cited by 107
Can plant phenolic compounds reduce Fusarium growth and mycotoxin production in cereals?
Schöneberg, T., Kibler, K., Sulyok, M., Musa, T., Bucheli, T. D., Mascher, F., Bertossa, M., Voegele, R. T., & Vogelgsang, S. (2018) · Food Additives & Contaminants: Part A · doi:10.1080/19440049.2018.1538570 · Cited by 67
Self-citationUse of Foodomics for Control of Food Processing and Assessing of Food Safety
Josić, D., Peršurić, Ž., Rešetar, D., Martinović, T., Saftić, L., & Kraljević Pavelić, S. (2017) · Advances in Food and Nutrition Research · doi:10.1016/bs.afnr.2016.12.001 · Cited by 28
Metadata
- Authors
- Malachová, A., Sulyok, M., Beltrán, E., Berthiller, F., & Krska, R.
- Venue
- Journal of Chromatography A
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-10
- Volume
- 1362
- Pages
- 145-156
- ISSN
- 0021-9673 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2009639464
- Cited by
- 444
- References
- 18
- FWCI
- 43.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Optimization and validation of a quantitative liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometric method covering 295 bacterial and fungal metabolites including all regulated mycotoxins in four model food matrices. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.chroma.2014.08.037
- The paper
- Malachová, A., Sulyok, M., Beltrán, E., Berthiller, F., & Krska, R. (2014). Optimization and validation of a quantitative liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometric method covering 295 bacterial and fungal metabolites including all regulated mycotoxins in four model food matrices. Journal of Chromatography A. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2014.08.037
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.