Cited by 48biodegradable polymer synthesis and propertiesPolymer crystallization and propertiesPolymer composites and self-healing

Physico-Mechanical Properties of Biodegradable Rubber Toughened Polymers

Farsetti, S., Cioni, B., Lazzeri, A.·2011·Macromolecular Symposia

Abstract

Summary: In this study, blends of poly(lactic acid) (PLA) with poly(butylene adipate‐co‐terephthalate) (PBAT) were studied for their mechanical and thermal properties as a function of the PBAT content. Tensile testing, impact testing, differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), dynamic mechanical analysis (DMTA) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) were used to characterize the blends. It was observed that PLA/PBAT blends maintained quite high modulus and tensile strength compared to pure PLA. Small amounts of PBAT improved the elongation at break and the impact resistance showing a debonding effect typical of rubber toughened systems.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/masy.201150311

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • When PBAT is added into the PLA matrix as a dispersed component, the tensile strength and modulus of elasticity decrease with increasing PBAT content (10-40 wt.%).

    “When PBAT is added into the PLA matrix as a dispersed component, different studies point that the elongation at break increases, but the tensile strength and modulus of elasticity decrease with increasing PBAT content (10–40 wt.%) [9,10,11].”
  • When PBAT is added into the PLA matrix as a dispersed component, the elongation at break increases with increasing PBAT content (10-40 wt.%).

    “When PBAT is added into the PLA matrix as a dispersed component, different studies point that the elongation at break increases, but the tensile strength and modulus of elasticity decrease with increasing PBAT content (10–40 wt.%) [9,10,11].”
  • The ∆Tg difference between blends is not higher than 3.5 °C.

    “The ∆Tg difference between blends is not higher than 3.5 °C, which agrees with the previous research results [8,11].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 22 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Farsetti, S., Cioni, B., & Lazzeri, A.
Affiliations
University of Pisa (IT)
Corresponding author
Farsetti, S.
Venue
Macromolecular Symposia
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-03
Volume
301
Issue
1
Pages
82-89
ISSN
  • 1022-1360 (ISSN-L)
  • 1521-3900
OpenAlex
W2167955848
Cited by
48
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Macromolecular Symposia (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Polymers and Plastics › Polymer crystallization and properties
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Polymers and Plastics › Polymer composites and self-healing
Keywords
polylactic acid, poly(butylene adipate-co-terephthalate), polymer blends, biodegradable polymers, rubber toughening, impact resistance, tensile properties, thermal properties, debonding, elongation at break

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review