Cited by 2

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Phylogenetic Profiling of the Diabetic Foot Ulcer Microbiome of an Afro‐Caribbean Population

Ojeh, Nkemcho, Mohapatra, Bidyut R., O'Shea, Margaret, Springer, Dale, Ward, Judy, Sallu, Mohmmed, Paquette, Natacha, Gooding, Keith, Springer, Anna, Peter Adams, O.·2026·MicrobiologyOpen

Abstract

Diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) are associated with high morbidity, amputation rates, and healthcare costs in Barbados. This pilot study compares the microbiome diversity of chronic DFUs and paired normal skin (controls) from biopsies in Afro‐Caribbean patients with type 2 diabetes using Illumina amplicon sequencing targeting the 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene and the internal transcribed spacer 2 (ITS2) region. Both DFUs and controls harbored diverse bacterial and fungal communities, with differences in taxonomic composition and relative abundance profiles. The dominant bacterial genera were Corynebacterium (18.3% in DFUs, 24.3% in controls) and Staphylococcus (14.9% in DFUs, 14.1% in controls). The dominant bacterial species was Corynebacterium striatum (17.3% in DFUs, 23.8% in controls) followed by Pseudomonas aeruginosa in DFUs (8.9%) and Staphylococcus aureus in controls (13.3%). The dominant fungal genera was Densospora (12% in DFUs, 12.6% in controls). The dominant fungal species was Rhodotorula graminis in DFUs (6.18%) and Paracamarosporium leucadendri in controls (3.85%). Candida duobushaemulonii , with intrinsic resistance to antifungal agents, was detected with higher relative abundance in DFUs than in controls (4.44% vs. 2.36%). Fungal Shannon alpha diversity was significantly reduced in DFUs ( p = 0.039), while beta diversity did not differ between groups for bacteria ( p = 0.982) or fungi ( p = 0.975). The differences in taxonomic composition and relative abundance profiles, and co‐occurrence of clinically relevant bacterial and fungal taxa, highlight the potential role of polymicrobial communities in DFU chronicity in the Afro‐Caribbean cohort studied, and supports future studies to evaluate implications for antimicrobial stewardship.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/mbo3.70329

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 4 references

Research works printed but not linked: 89

  1. 10.1111/dme.13989 · DOI
  2. 10.2147/vhrm.S364993 · DOI
  3. 10.3390/ijms262311365 · DOI
  4. 10.3390/pathogens10080937 · DOI
  5. 10.1111/j.1442-9993.2001.01070.pp.x · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1055/s-0041-1731463 · DOI
  7. 10.1128/aac.48.7.2659-2664.2004 · DOI
  8. Boulton A. J. M., 2000, Endotext. South Dartmouth (MA)
  9. 10.1016/j.micpath.2018.05.043 · DOI
  10. 10.2307/1942268 · DOI
  11. 10.1093/biomet/65.3.625 · DOI
  12. 10.2307/1936861 · DOI
  13. 10.3389/fmicb.2019.02162 · DOI
  14. 10.1128/jcm.02248-12 · DOI
  15. Chao A., 1984, Nonparametric Estimation of the Number of Classes in a Population, Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 11, 265
  16. 10.1080/01621459.1992.10475194 · DOI
  17. 10.1038/s41396-021-00901-5 · DOI
  18. 10.1128/jcm.00551-07 · DOI
  19. 10.1126/science.1177486 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1126/scitranslmed.3009337 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1016/0006-3207(92)91201-3 · DOI
  22. 10.1111/j.1365-294X.1993.tb00005.x · DOI
  23. 10.1111/wrr.12310 · DOI
  24. 10.2307/2333344 · DOI
  25. 10.1111/dme.14888 · DOI
  26. 10.1111/dme.14773 · DOI
  27. 10.1016/j.jid.2019.01.024 · DOI
  28. 10.1111/j.1524-475X.2011.00690.x · DOI
  29. 10.3201/eid2211.160141 · DOI
  30. 10.1111/myc.13046 · DOI
  31. 10.2337/diacare.27.11.2636 · DOI
  32. 10.1186/1471-2482-8-5 · DOI
  33. 10.1128/jcm.01492-16 · DOI
  34. 10.3389/fmicb.2022.1021955 · DOI
  35. 10.1007/s13225-024-00545-8 · DOI
  36. 10.1080/21505594.2016.1249093 · DOI
  37. 10.1128/mBio.01058-16 · DOI · Paper page
  38. 10.1016/j.chom.2019.03.006 · DOI
  39. 10.1016/j.mib.2015.07.017 · DOI
  40. 10.1089/wound.2023.0036 · DOI
  41. 10.1093/nar/gks808 · DOI · Paper page
  42. 10.1002/dmrr.3280 · DOI
  43. 10.3767/persoonia.2024.52.02 · DOI · Paper page
  44. 10.1016/j.jid.2016.08.009 · DOI
  45. 10.1111/iwj.13940 · DOI
  46. 10.1016/j.chom.2019.04.006 · DOI
  47. 10.3390/ijms232415476 · DOI
  48. 10.2147/idr.S446838 · DOI
  49. 10.12968/jowc.2017.26.1.20 · DOI
  50. 10.4161/viru.22913 · DOI · Paper page
  51. 10.2337/dci22-0043 · DOI
  52. 10.1128/aac.01111-17 · DOI
  53. 10.1089/wound.2012.0397 · DOI · Paper page
  54. 10.1016/j.mib.2022.102235 · DOI
  55. 10.1038/s41579-018-0116-y · DOI
  56. 10.3201/eid2203.151610 · DOI
  57. 10.1242/dmm.016782 · DOI · Paper page
  58. 10.1128/jcm.06599-11 · DOI
  59. 10.1038/s41598-022-05244-5 · DOI
  60. 10.1007/s13225-022-00502-3 · DOI
  61. 10.1016/0022-5193(66)90013-0 · DOI
  62. 10.1016/j.jid.2017.11.038 · DOI
  63. 10.3390/jof6020046 · DOI
  64. 10.1093/infdis/jit005 · DOI
  65. 10.37757/mr2021.V23.N3.8 · DOI
  66. 10.1177/1747493018778713 · DOI
  67. 10.3390/jcm8111935 · DOI
  68. 10.1111/jdv.18347 · DOI
  69. 10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x · DOI · Paper page
  70. 10.1007/s00203-021-02246-1 · DOI
  71. 10.1038/163688a0 · DOI
  72. 10.3389/fmicb.2019.00438 · DOI · Paper page
  73. 10.1007/s12325-022-02348-2 · DOI
  74. 10.7861/clinmedicine.14-4-367 · DOI
  75. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1008511 · DOI
  76. 10.1007/s40257-020-00536-w · DOI
  77. 10.1186/s12866-020-01843-2 · DOI
  78. 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2021.115592 · DOI
  79. 10.3389/fendo.2025.1657928 · DOI
  80. 10.1007/s00253-021-11387-8 · DOI
  81. White T. J., 1990, PCR Protocols, 315
  82. 10.1155/2012/465717 · DOI
  83. 10.1111/wrr.12370 · DOI
  84. 10.1080/21501203.2019.1614106 · DOI
  85. 10.3390/ijms20143423 · DOI
  86. 10.1099/ijsem.0.001755 · DOI
  87. 10.2147/ccid.S425922 · DOI
  88. 10.1007/s11046-025-01008-7 · DOI
  89. 10.2337/db20-0503 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Ojeh, N., Mohapatra, B. R., O'Shea, M., Springer, D., Ward, J., Sallu, M., Paquette, N., Gooding, K., Springer, A., & Peter Adams, O.
Venue
MicrobiologyOpen
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2026-06
Volume
15
Issue
3
ISSN
2045-8827
Cited by
2
References
4
Language
en
Funders
University of the West indies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review