The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Phylogenetic Profiling of the Diabetic Foot Ulcer Microbiome of an Afro‐Caribbean Population
Abstract
Diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) are associated with high morbidity, amputation rates, and healthcare costs in Barbados. This pilot study compares the microbiome diversity of chronic DFUs and paired normal skin (controls) from biopsies in Afro‐Caribbean patients with type 2 diabetes using Illumina amplicon sequencing targeting the 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene and the internal transcribed spacer 2 (ITS2) region. Both DFUs and controls harbored diverse bacterial and fungal communities, with differences in taxonomic composition and relative abundance profiles. The dominant bacterial genera were Corynebacterium (18.3% in DFUs, 24.3% in controls) and Staphylococcus (14.9% in DFUs, 14.1% in controls). The dominant bacterial species was Corynebacterium striatum (17.3% in DFUs, 23.8% in controls) followed by Pseudomonas aeruginosa in DFUs (8.9%) and Staphylococcus aureus in controls (13.3%). The dominant fungal genera was Densospora (12% in DFUs, 12.6% in controls). The dominant fungal species was Rhodotorula graminis in DFUs (6.18%) and Paracamarosporium leucadendri in controls (3.85%). Candida duobushaemulonii , with intrinsic resistance to antifungal agents, was detected with higher relative abundance in DFUs than in controls (4.44% vs. 2.36%). Fungal Shannon alpha diversity was significantly reduced in DFUs ( p = 0.039), while beta diversity did not differ between groups for bacteria ( p = 0.982) or fungi ( p = 0.975). The differences in taxonomic composition and relative abundance profiles, and co‐occurrence of clinically relevant bacterial and fungal taxa, highlight the potential role of polymicrobial communities in DFU chronicity in the Afro‐Caribbean cohort studied, and supports future studies to evaluate implications for antimicrobial stewardship.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gupta, V. K., Paul, S., & Dutta, C. (2017) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2017.01162 · Cited by 1,019
Pastar, I., Nusbaum, A. G., Gil, J., Patel, S. B., Chen, J., Valdes, J., Stojadinovic, O., Plano, L. R., Tomic-Canic, M., & Davis, S. C. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0056846 · Cited by 391
The Neuropathic Diabetic Foot Ulcer Microbiome Is Associated With Clinical Factors
Gardner, S. E., Hillis, S. L., Heilmann, K., Segre, J. A., & Grice, E. A. (2013) · Diabetes · doi:10.2337/db12-0771 · Cited by 320
Ramos, R., Caceres, D. H., Perez, M., Garcia, N., Castillo, W., Santiago, E., Borace, J., Lockhart, S. R., Berkow, E. L., Hayer, L., et al. (2018) · Journal of Clinical Microbiology · doi:10.1128/jcm.00371-18 · Cited by 32
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 89
- 10.1111/dme.13989 · DOI
- 10.2147/vhrm.S364993 · DOI
- 10.3390/ijms262311365 · DOI
- 10.3390/pathogens10080937 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1442-9993.2001.01070.pp.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1055/s-0041-1731463 · DOI
- 10.1128/aac.48.7.2659-2664.2004 · DOI
- Boulton A. J. M., 2000, Endotext. South Dartmouth (MA)
- 10.1016/j.micpath.2018.05.043 · DOI
- 10.2307/1942268 · DOI
- 10.1093/biomet/65.3.625 · DOI
- 10.2307/1936861 · DOI
- 10.3389/fmicb.2019.02162 · DOI
- 10.1128/jcm.02248-12 · DOI
- Chao A., 1984, Nonparametric Estimation of the Number of Classes in a Population, Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 11, 265
- 10.1080/01621459.1992.10475194 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41396-021-00901-5 · DOI
- 10.1128/jcm.00551-07 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.1177486 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1126/scitranslmed.3009337 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/0006-3207(92)91201-3 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1365-294X.1993.tb00005.x · DOI
- 10.1111/wrr.12310 · DOI
- 10.2307/2333344 · DOI
- 10.1111/dme.14888 · DOI
- 10.1111/dme.14773 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jid.2019.01.024 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1524-475X.2011.00690.x · DOI
- 10.3201/eid2211.160141 · DOI
- 10.1111/myc.13046 · DOI
- 10.2337/diacare.27.11.2636 · DOI
- 10.1186/1471-2482-8-5 · DOI
- 10.1128/jcm.01492-16 · DOI
- 10.3389/fmicb.2022.1021955 · DOI
- 10.1007/s13225-024-00545-8 · DOI
- 10.1080/21505594.2016.1249093 · DOI
- 10.1128/mBio.01058-16 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.chom.2019.03.006 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.mib.2015.07.017 · DOI
- 10.1089/wound.2023.0036 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gks808 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/dmrr.3280 · DOI
- 10.3767/persoonia.2024.52.02 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.jid.2016.08.009 · DOI
- 10.1111/iwj.13940 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.chom.2019.04.006 · DOI
- 10.3390/ijms232415476 · DOI
- 10.2147/idr.S446838 · DOI
- 10.12968/jowc.2017.26.1.20 · DOI
- 10.4161/viru.22913 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2337/dci22-0043 · DOI
- 10.1128/aac.01111-17 · DOI
- 10.1089/wound.2012.0397 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.mib.2022.102235 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41579-018-0116-y · DOI
- 10.3201/eid2203.151610 · DOI
- 10.1242/dmm.016782 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1128/jcm.06599-11 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41598-022-05244-5 · DOI
- 10.1007/s13225-022-00502-3 · DOI
- 10.1016/0022-5193(66)90013-0 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jid.2017.11.038 · DOI
- 10.3390/jof6020046 · DOI
- 10.1093/infdis/jit005 · DOI
- 10.37757/mr2021.V23.N3.8 · DOI
- 10.1177/1747493018778713 · DOI
- 10.3390/jcm8111935 · DOI
- 10.1111/jdv.18347 · DOI
- 10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/s00203-021-02246-1 · DOI
- 10.1038/163688a0 · DOI
- 10.3389/fmicb.2019.00438 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/s12325-022-02348-2 · DOI
- 10.7861/clinmedicine.14-4-367 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.ppat.1008511 · DOI
- 10.1007/s40257-020-00536-w · DOI
- 10.1186/s12866-020-01843-2 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2021.115592 · DOI
- 10.3389/fendo.2025.1657928 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00253-021-11387-8 · DOI
- White T. J., 1990, PCR Protocols, 315
- 10.1155/2012/465717 · DOI
- 10.1111/wrr.12370 · DOI
- 10.1080/21501203.2019.1614106 · DOI
- 10.3390/ijms20143423 · DOI
- 10.1099/ijsem.0.001755 · DOI
- 10.2147/ccid.S425922 · DOI
- 10.1007/s11046-025-01008-7 · DOI
- 10.2337/db20-0503 · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Ojeh, N., Mohapatra, B. R., O'Shea, M., Springer, D., Ward, J., Sallu, M., Paquette, N., Gooding, K., Springer, A., & Peter Adams, O.
- Venue
- MicrobiologyOpen
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2026-06
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 3
- ISSN
- 2045-8827
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 4
- Language
- en
- Funders
- University of the West indies
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review