Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 235

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Long‐term follow‐up of impulse control disorders in Parkinson's disease

Open access
Mamikonyan, Eugenia, Siderowf, Andrew D., Duda, John E., Potenza, Marc N., Horn, Stacy, Stern, Matthew B., Weintraub, Daniel·2008·Movement Disorders

Abstract

Recent studies have linked dopamine agonist (DA) usage with the development of impulse control disorders (ICDs) in Parkinson's disease (PD). Little is known about optimal management strategies or the long‐term outcomes of affected patients. To report on the clinical interventions and long‐term outcomes of PD patients who developed an ICD after DA initiation. Subjects contacted by telephone for a follow‐up interview after a mean time period of 29.2 months. They were administered a modified Minnesota Impulse Disorder Interview for compulsive buying, gambling, and sexuality, and also self‐rated changes in their ICD symptomatology. Baseline and follow‐up dopamine replacement therapy use was recorded and verified by chart review. Of 18 subjects, 15 (83.3%) participated in the follow‐up interview. At follow‐up, patients were receiving a significantly lower DA levodopa equivalent daily dosage (LEDD) (Z = −3.1, P = 0.002) and a higher daily levodopa dosage (Z = −1.9, P = 0.05), but a similar total LEDD dosage (Z = −0.47, P = 0.64) with no changes in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale motor score (Z = −1.3, P = 0.19). As part of ICD management, 12 (80.0%) patients discontinued or significantly decreased DA treatment, all of whom experienced full or partial remission of ICD symptoms by self‐report, and 10 (83.3%) of whom no longer met diagnostic criteria for an ICD. For PD patients who develop an ICD in the context of DA treatment, discontinuing or significantly decreasing DA exposure, even when offset by an increase in levodopa treatment, is associated with remission of or significant reduction in ICD behaviors without worsening in motor symptoms. © 2007 Movement Disorder Society

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/mds.21770

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 235

Metadata

Authors
Mamikonyan, E., Siderowf, A. D., Duda, J. E., Potenza, M. N., Horn, S., Stern, M. B., & Weintraub, D.
Venue
Movement Disorders
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-01
Volume
23
Issue
1
Pages
75-80
ISSN
  • 0885-3185 (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-8257
OpenAlex
W1988159999
Cited by
235
References
2
FWCI
10.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Long‐term follow‐up of impulse control disorders in Parkinson's disease. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/mds.21770
The paper
Mamikonyan, E., Siderowf, A. D., Duda, J. E., Potenza, M. N., Horn, S., Stern, M. B., & Weintraub, D. (2008). Long‐term follow‐up of impulse control disorders in Parkinson's disease. Movement Disorders. https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.21770

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.