Cited by 563Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and TreatmentsGambling Behavior and TreatmentsNeurological disorders and treatments

Pathological Gambling Caused by Drugs Used to Treat Parkinson Disease

Dodd, M. Leann, Klos, Kevin J., Bower, James H., Geda, Yonas E., Josephs, Keith A., Ahlskog, J. Eric·2005·Archives of Neurology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pathological gambling is a rare potential complication related to treatment of Parkinson disease (PD). However, the etiology of this behavior is poorly understood. OBJECTIVE: To examine the relationship between medical therapy for PD and pathological gambling. METHODS: In our routine movement disorders practice (2002-2004), we encountered 11 patients with idiopathic PD who had recently developed pathological gambling. We assessed the relationship to their medical therapy and compared them with cases identified by systematic review of the existing literature on pathological gambling and PD. RESULTS: All 11 patients with PD and pathological gambling were taking therapeutic doses of a dopamine agonist; 3 of these patients were not treated with levodopa. In 7 patients, pathological gambling developed within 3 months of starting to take or escalating the dose of the agonist; in the other 4 with a longer latency, gambling resolved after the agonist use was discontinued. Pramipexole dihydrochloride was the agonist in 9 of 11 cases in our series and 10 of 17 in the literature (68% in total). CONCLUSIONS: Dopamine agonist therapy was associated with potentially reversible pathological gambling, and pramipexole was the medication predominantly implicated. This may relate to disproportionate stimulation of dopamine D(3) receptors, which are primarily localized to the limbic system.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/archneur.62.9.noc50009

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dodd, M. L., Klos, K. J., Bower, J. H., Geda, Y. E., Josephs, K. A., & Ahlskog, J. E.
Affiliations
Mayo Clinic (US)
Venue
Archives of Neurology
Published
2005-09-01
Volume
62
Issue
9
Pages
1377
ISSN
0003-9942 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1980951225
Cited by
563
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 28 · 2013: 28 · 2012: 60
FWCI
34.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Archives of Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Gambling Behavior and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Neurological disorders and treatments
Keywords
gambling addiction, Parkinson's disease, dopamine agonists, pramipexole, drug-induced psychiatric adverse effects, dopamine D3 receptor, levodopa
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Antiparkinson Agents, Female, Gambling, Humans, Disruptive, Impulse Control, and Conduct Disorders, Levodopa, Male, Middle Aged, Parkinson Disease, Review Literature as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review