Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 274

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Comparison of desipramine and citalopram treatments for depression in Parkinson's disease: A double‐blind, randomized, placebo‐controlled study

Devos, David, Dujardin, Kathy, Poirot, Isabelle, Moreau, Caroline, Cottencin, Olivier, Thomas, Pierre, Destée, Alain, Bordet, Regis, Defebvre, Luc·2008·Movement Disorders

Abstract

Depression is one of the most common psychiatric disturbances in Parkinson's disease (PD). Recent reviews have highlighted the lack of controlled trials and the ensuing difficulty in formulating recommendations for antidepressant use in PD. We sought to establish whether antidepressants provide real benefits and whether tricyclic and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) antidepressants differ in their short‐term efficacy, because the time to onset of therapeutic benefit remains an important criterion in depression. The short‐term efficacy (after 14 and 30 days) of two antidepressants (desipramine, a predominantly noradrenergic reuptake inhibitor tricyclic and citalopram, a SSRI) was assessed in a double‐blind, randomized, placebo‐ controlled study of 48 nondemented PD patients suffering from major depression. After 14 days, desipramine prompted an improvement in the Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) score, compared with citalopram and placebo. Both antidepressants produced significant improvements in the MADRS score after 30 days. Mild adverse events were twice as frequent in the desipramine group as in the other groups. A predominantly noradrenergic tricyclic antidepressant induced a more intense short‐term effect on parkinsonian depression than did an SSRI. However, desipramine's lower tolerability may outweigh its slight short‐term clinical advantage. © 2008 Movement Disorder Society

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/mds.21966

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 274

Metadata

Authors
Devos, D., Dujardin, K., Poirot, I., Moreau, C., Cottencin, O., Thomas, P., Destée, A., Bordet, R., & Defebvre, L.
Venue
Movement Disorders
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-04-24
Volume
23
Issue
6
Pages
850-857
ISSN
  • 0885-3185 (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-8257
OpenAlex
W2110790733
Cited by
274
References
5
FWCI
14.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparison of desipramine and citalopram treatments for depression in Parkinson's disease: A double‐blind, randomized, placebo‐controlled study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/mds.21966
The paper
Devos, D., Dujardin, K., Poirot, I., Moreau, C., Cottencin, O., Thomas, P., Destée, A., Bordet, R., & Defebvre, L. (2008). Comparison of desipramine and citalopram treatments for depression in Parkinson's disease: A double‐blind, randomized, placebo‐controlled study. Movement Disorders. https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.21966

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.