Cited by 208

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Amyloid deposition in Parkinson's disease and cognitive impairment: A systematic review

Petrou, Myria, Dwamena, Ben A., Foerster, Bradley R., MacEachern, Mark P., Bohnen, Nicolaas I., Müller, Martijn LTM, Albin, Roger L., Frey, Kirk A.·2015·Movement Disorders

Abstract

Background: Varying degrees of cortical amyloid deposition are reported in the setting of Parkinsonism with cognitive impairment. We performed a systematic review to estimate the prevalence of Alzheimer disease (AD) range cortical amyloid deposition among patients with Parkinson's disease with dementia (PDD), Parkinson's disease with mild cognitive impairment (PD‐MCI) and dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB). We included amyloid positron emission tomography (PET) imaging studies using Pittsburgh Compound B (PiB). Methods: We searched the databases Ovid MEDLINE, PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science for articles pertaining to amyloid imaging in Parkinsonism and impaired cognition. We identified 11 articles using PiB imaging to quantify cortical amyloid. We used the metan module in Stata, version 11.0, to calculate point prevalence estimates of patients with “PiB‐positive” studies, that is, patients showing AD range cortical Aβ‐amyloid deposition. Heterogeneity was assessed. A scatterplot was used to assess publication bias. Results: Overall pooled prevalence of “PiB‐positive” studies across all three entities along the spectrum of Parkinson's disease and impaired cognition (specifically PDD, PD‐MCI, and DLB) was 0.41 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.24‐0.57). Prevalence of “PiB‐positive” studies was 0.68 (95% CI, 0.55‐0.82) in the DLB group, 0.34 (95% CI, 0.13‐0.56) in the PDD group, and 0.05 (95% CI, −0.07‐0.17) in the PD‐MCI group. Conclusions: Substantial variability occurs in the prevalence of “PiB‐positive” studies in subjects with Parkinsonism and cognitive impairment. Higher prevalence of PiB‐positive studies was encountered among subjects with DLB as opposed to subjects with PDD. The PD‐MCI subjects showed overall lower prevalence of PiB‐positive studies than reported findings in non–PD‐related MCI. © 2015 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/mds.26191

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 35

  1. 10.1007/s00401-008-0344-8 · DOI
  2. 10.1001/archneur.60.3.387 · DOI
  3. 10.1017/S0033291713002213 · DOI
  4. 10.1017/S0033291713000494 · DOI
  5. 10.1159/000197890 · DOI
  6. 10.1212/01.wnl.0000256715.13907.d3 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1007/s00401-011-0852-9 · DOI
  8. 10.1016/S1353-8020(08)70005-1 · DOI
  9. 10.1002/ana.20009 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1093/brain/awr031 · DOI
  11. 10.1097/NEN.0b013e31816362aa · DOI
  12. 10.1093/brain/awr089 · DOI
  13. 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2011.09.024 · DOI
  14. 10.1016/j.nbd.2008.12.008 · DOI
  15. 10.1002/mds.23393 · DOI
  16. 10.1002/mds.25286 · DOI
  17. 10.1002/mds.25048 · DOI
  18. 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31827b1a07 · DOI
  19. 10.1136/jnnp.2007.127878 · DOI
  20. 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2010.08.021 · DOI
  21. 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182698d4a · DOI
  22. 10.1186/1471-2288-3-25 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1001/archneur.1993.00540020018011 · DOI
  24. 10.1111/j.1600-0404.1994.tb01674.x · DOI
  25. American Psychiatric Association, Diagnostic criteria from DSM‐IV‐TR. 2000, 370
  26. 10.1002/sim.1186 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.2967/jnumed.111.089730 · DOI
  28. 10.1001/archneurol.2011.153 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1001/archneurol.2010.357 · DOI
  30. 10.1212/01.wnl.0000228230.26044.a4 · DOI · Paper page
  31. 10.1016/S1474-4422(12)70227-2 · DOI
  32. 10.1016/S1474-4422(14)70194-2 · DOI · Paper page
  33. 10.1002/mds.21956 · DOI
  34. 10.1001/archneurol.2012.764 · DOI
  35. Scheinin NM, 2014, Cortical 11C‐PIB uptake is associated with age, APOE genotype, and gender in “healthy aging.”, J Alzheimers Dis, 41, 193, 10.3233/JAD-132783 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Petrou, M., Dwamena, B. A., Foerster, B. R., MacEachern, M. P., Bohnen, N. I., Müller, M. L., Albin, R. L., & Frey, K. A.
Affiliations
  • Department of Radiology University of Michigan Ann Arbor Michigan USA
  • Taubman Health Sciences Library University of Michigan Ann Arbor Michigan USA
  • Veterans Administration Healthcare System Ann Arbor Michigan USA
Venue
Movement Disorders
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-04-16
Volume
30
Issue
7
Pages
928-935
ISSN
  • 0885-3185
  • 1531-8257
Cited by
208
References
8
Language
en
Funders
USPHS (P50NS091856)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review