The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Unified Huntington's disease rating scale: Reliability and consistency
Abstract
The Unified Huntington's disease Rating Scale (UHDRS) was developed as a clinical rating scale to assess four domains of clinical performance and capacity in HD: motor function, cognitive function, behavioral abnormalities, and functional capacity. We assessed the internal consistency and the intercorrelations for the four domains and examined changes in ratings over time. We also performed an interrater reliability study of the motor assessment. We found there was a high degree of internal consistency within each of the domains of the UHDRS and that there were significant intercorrelations between the domains of the UHDRS, with the exception of the total behavioral score. There was an excellent degree of interrater reliability for the motor scores. Our limited longitudinal database indicates that the UHDRS may be useful for tracking changes in the clinical features of HD over time. The UHDRS assesses relevant clinical features of HD and appears to be appropriate for repeated administration during clinical studies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions
Stroop, J. R. (1935) · Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0054651 · Cited by 18,622
Huntington disease: Clinical care and evaluation
Shoulson, I., & Fahn, S. (1979) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.29.1.1 · Cited by 746
Cited by
Scale for the assessment and rating of ataxia: Development of a new clinical scale
Schmitz-Hübsch, T., du Montcel, S. T., Baliko, L., Berciano, J., Boesch, S., Depondt, C., Giunti, P., Globas, C., Infante, J., Kang, J. S., et al. (2006) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000219042.60538.92 · Cited by 1,967
Bates, G. P., Dorsey, R., Gusella, J. F., Hayden, M. R., Kay, C., Leavitt, B. R., Nance, M., Ross, C. A., Scahill, R. I., Wetzel, R., et al. (2015) · Nature Reviews Disease Primers · doi:10.1038/nrdp.2015.5 · Cited by 1,641
Regional and progressive thinning of the cortical ribbon in Huntington’s disease
Rosas, H. D., Liu, A. K., Hersch, S., Glessner, M., Ferrante, R. J., Salat, D. H., van der Kouwe, A., Jenkins, B. G., Dale, A. M., & Fischl, B. (2002) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.58.5.695 · Cited by 1,044
Huntington disease: natural history, biomarkers and prospects for therapeutics
Ross, C. A., Aylward, E. H., Wild, E. J., Langbehn, D. R., Long, J. D., Warner, J. H., Scahill, R. I., Leavitt, B. R., Stout, J. C., Paulsen, J. S., et al. (2014) · Nature Reviews Neurology · doi:10.1038/nrneurol.2014.24 · Cited by 1,016
Tabrizi, S. J., Langbehn, D. R., Leavitt, B. R., Roos, R. A., Durr, A., Craufurd, D., Kennard, C., Hicks, S. L., Fox, N. C., Scahill, R. I., et al. (2009) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(09)70170-x · Cited by 984
Metadata
- Venue
- Movement Disorders
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1996-03
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 136-142
- ISSN
- 0885-3185 (ISSN-L)
- 1531-8257
- OpenAlex
- W2606710341
- Cited by
- 2,079
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 4.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
