Cited by 1,016Genetic Neurodegenerative DiseasesNeurological disorders and treatmentsNeurological diseases and metabolism

Huntington disease: natural history, biomarkers and prospects for therapeutics

Ross, Christopher A., Aylward, Elizabeth H., Wild, Edward J., Langbehn, Douglas R., Long, Jeffrey D., Warner, John H., Scahill, Rachael I., Leavitt, Blair R. +7 more·2014·Nature Reviews Neurology

Abstract

Huntington disease (HD) can be seen as a model neurodegenerative disorder, in that it is caused by a single genetic mutation and is amenable to predictive genetic testing, with estimation of years to predicted onset, enabling the entire range of disease natural history to be studied. Structural neuroimaging biomarkers show that progressive regional brain atrophy begins many years before the emergence of diagnosable signs and symptoms of HD, and continues steadily during the symptomatic or 'manifest' period. The continued development of functional, neurochemical and other biomarkers raises hopes that these biomarkers might be useful for future trials of disease-modifying therapeutics to delay the onset and slow the progression of HD. Such advances could herald a new era of personalized preventive therapeutics. We describe the natural history of HD, including the timing of emergence of motor, cognitive and emotional impairments, and the techniques that are used to assess these features. Building on this information, we review recent progress in the development of biomarkers for HD, and potential future roles of these biomarkers in clinical trials.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nrneurol.2014.24

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. [16]Wexler, N. S. et al. Venezuelan kindreds reveal that genetic and environmental factors modulate Huntington's disease age of onset. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101 , 34983503 (2004).
  2. [17]Langbehn, D. R., Hayden, M. R. & Paulsen, J. S. CAG-repeat length and the age of onset in Huntington disease (HD): a review and validation study of statistical approaches. Am. J. Med. Genet. B Neuropsychiatr. Genet. 153B , 397-408 (2010).
  3. [49]Harper, S. Q. et al. RNA interference improves motor and neuropathological abnormalities in a Huntington's disease mouse model. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102 , 5820-5825 (2005).
  4. [121]Hu, Y. et al. Transcriptional modulator H2A histone family, member Y (H2AFY) marks Huntington disease activity in man and mouse. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108 , 1714117146 (2011).
  5. [129]Warner, J. H. & Hayden, M. A new model for age-at-onset in Huntington's Disease. Presented at CHDI Foundation Huntington's Disease Therapeutics Conference (Palm Springs, CA, USA, 2012).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ross, C. A., Aylward, E. H., Wild, E. J., Langbehn, D. R., Long, J. D., Warner, J. H., Scahill, R. I., Leavitt, B. R., Stout, J. C., Paulsen, J. S., Reilmann, R., Unschuld, P. G., Wexler, A., Margolis, R. L., & Tabrizi, S. J.
Affiliations
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • Seattle Children's Research Institute (US)
  • University College London (GB)
  • University of Iowa (US)
  • CHDI Foundation (US)
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
  • Monash University (AU)
  • George Huntington Institute (DE)
  • University of Zurich (CH)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Corresponding author
Ross, Christopher A.
Venue
Nature Reviews Neurology
Published
2014-03-11
Volume
10
Issue
4
Pages
204-216
ISSN
  • 1759-4758 (ISSN-L)
  • 1759-4766
OpenAlex
W2020117714
Cited by
1,016
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 63 · 2025: 72 · 2024: 70 · 2023: 88 · 2022: 79 · 2021: 90 · 2020: 111 · 2019: 90 · 2018: 91 · 2017: 97 · 2016: 74 · 2015: 61 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 1
FWCI
9.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature Reviews Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (CL-2009-18-005)
  • Academy of Medical Sciences (AMS-SGCL6-Wild)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS040068)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Genetic Neurodegenerative Diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Neurological disorders and treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neurological diseases and metabolism
Keywords
Huntington's disease, natural history (disease), biomarkers, neurodegeneration, brain atrophy, disease-modifying therapy, predictive genetic testing, motor impairment, cognitive impairment, emotional impairment, clinical trial endpoints, personalized prevention
MeSH terms
Brain, Humans, Huntington Disease, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Radionuclide Imaging, Biomarkers, Neuroimaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review