The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Warburg Effect Revisited—Lesson from the Sertoli Cell
Open accessAbstract
Otto Warburg observed that cancerous cells prefer fermentative instead of oxidative metabolism of glucose, although the former is in theory less efficient. Since Warburg's pioneering works, special attention has been given to this difference in cell metabolism. The Warburg effect has been implicated in cell transformation, immortalization, and proliferation during tumorigenesis. Cancer cells display enhanced glycolytic activity, which is correlated with high proliferation, and thus, glycolysis appears to be an excellent candidate to target cancer cells. Nevertheless, little attention has been given to noncancerous cells that exhibit a “Warburg‐like” metabolism with slight, but perhaps crucial, alterations that may provide new directions to develop new and effective anticancer therapies. Within the testis, the somatic Sertoli cell (SC) presents several common metabolic features analogous to cancer cells, and a clear “Warburg‐like” metabolism. Nevertheless, SCs actively proliferate only during a specific time period, ceasing to divide in most species after puberty, when they become terminally differentiated. The special metabolic features of SC, as well as progression from the immature but proliferative state, to the mature nonproliferative state, where a high glycolytic activity is maintained, make these cells unique and a good model to discuss new perspectives on the Warburg effect. Herein we provide new insight on how the somatic SC may be a source of new and exciting information concerning the Warburg effect and cell proliferation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Regulation of cancer cell metabolism
Cairns, R. A., Harris, I. S., & Mak, T. W. (2011) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc2981 · Cited by 4,744
The Biology of Cancer: Metabolic Reprogramming Fuels Cell Growth and Proliferation
DeBerardinis, R. J., Lum, J. J., Hatzivassiliou, G., & Thompson, C. B. (2008) · Cell Metabolism · doi:10.1016/j.cmet.2007.10.002 · Cited by 4,088
mTOR: from growth signal integration to cancer, diabetes and ageing
Zoncu, R., Efeyan, A., & Sabatini, D. M. (2011) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm3025 · Cited by 3,941
Metabolic Reprogramming: A Cancer Hallmark Even Warburg Did Not Anticipate
Ward, P. S., & Thompson, C. B. (2012) · Cancer Cell · doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2012.02.014 · Cited by 3,233
Fatty acid synthase and the lipogenic phenotype in cancer pathogenesis
Menendez, J. A., & Lupu, R. (2007) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc2222 · Cited by 2,941
Cancer cell metabolism: warburg and beyond
Hsu, P. P., & Sabatini, D. M. (2008) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2008.08.021 · Cited by 2,452
Regulation of cellular metabolism by protein lysine acetylation
Zhao, S., Xu, W., Jiang, W., Yu, W., Lin, Y., Zhang, T., Yao, J., Zhou, L., Zeng, Y., Li, H., et al. (2010) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1179689 · Cited by 1,910
Shaw, R. J., Kosmatka, M., Bardeesy, N., Hurley, R. L., Witters, L. A., DePinho, R. A., & Cantley, L. C. (2004) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0308061100 · Cited by 1,797
p53 Regulates Mitochondrial Respiration
Matoba, S., Kang, J.-G., Patino, W. D., Wragg, A., Boehm, M., Gavrilova, O., Hurley, P. J., Bunz, F., & Hwang, P. M. (2006) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1126863 · Cited by 1,650
Fantin, V. R., St-Pierre, J., & Leder, P. (2006) · Cancer Cell · doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2006.04.023 · Cited by 1,635
Cited by
The Sertoli cell: one hundred fifty years of beauty and plasticity
França, L. R., Hess, R. A., Dufour, J. M., Hofmann, M. C., & Griswold, M. D. (2016) · Andrology · doi:10.1111/andr.12165 · Cited by 419
Tatone, C., Di Emidio, G., Barbonetti, A., Carta, G., Luciano, A. M., Falone, S., & Amicarelli, F. (2018) · Human Reproduction Update · doi:10.1093/humupd/dmy003 · Cited by 294
Ding, J., Karp, J. E., & Emadi, A. (2017) · Cancer Biomarkers · doi:10.3233/cbm-160336 · Cited by 287
Metadata
- Authors
- Oliveira, P. F., Martins, A. D., Moreira, A. C., Cheng, C. Y., & Alves, M. G.
- Venue
- Medicinal Research Reviews
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2014-07-12
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 126-151
- ISSN
- 0198-6325 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-1128
- OpenAlex
- W1511003303
- Cited by
- 185
- References
- 20
- FWCI
- 5.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Warburg Effect Revisited—Lesson from the Sertoli Cell. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/med.21325
- The paper
- Oliveira, P. F., Martins, A. D., Moreira, A. C., Cheng, C. Y., & Alves, M. G. (2015). The Warburg Effect Revisited—Lesson from the Sertoli Cell. Medicinal Research Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1002/med.21325
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.