Universal Approach for Structural Interpretation of QSAR/QSPR Models
Abstract
In this paper we offer a novel approach for the structural interpretation of QSAR models. The major advantage of our developed methodology is its universality, i.e., it can be applied to any QSAR/QSPR model irrespective of chemical descriptors and machine learning methods applied. This universality was achieved by using only the information obtained from substructures of the compounds of interest to interpret model outcomes. Reliability of the offered approach was confirmed by the results of three case studies, including end‐points of different types (continuous and binary classification) and nature (solubility, mutagenicity, and inhibition of Transglutaminase 2), various fragment and whole‐molecule descriptors (Simplex and Dragon), and multiple modeling techniques (partial least squares, random forest, and support vector machines). We compared the global contributions of molecular fragments obtained using our methodology with known SAR rules derived experimentally. In all cases high concordance between our interpretation and results published by others was observed. Although the proposed interpretation approach could be easily extended to any type of descriptors, we would recommend using Simplex descriptors to achieve a larger variety of investigated molecular fragments. The developed approach is a good tool for interpretation of such “black box” models like random forest, neural networks, etc. Analysis of fragment global contributions and their deviation across a dataset could be useful for the identification of key fragments and structural alerts. This information could be helpful to maximize the positive influence of structural surroundings on the given fragment and to decrease the negative effects.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Cites
Breiman, L. (2001) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1023/a:1010933404324 · Cited by 133,538 · see citing works
Classification And Regression Trees
Breiman, L., Friedman, J. H., Olshen, R. A., & Stone, C. J. (2017) · doi:10.1201/9781315139470 · Cited by 11,417 · see citing works
PLS-regression: a basic tool of chemometrics
Wold, S., Sjöström, M., & Eriksson, L. (2001) · Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems · doi:10.1016/s0169-7439(01)00155-1 · Cited by 10,084 · see citing works
On the shortest spanning subtree of a graph and the traveling salesman problem
Kruskal, J. B. (1956) · Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society · doi:10.1090/s0002-9939-1956-0078686-7 · Cited by 5,173 · see citing works
Handbook of Molecular Descriptors
Todeschini, R., & Consonni, V. (2000) · Methods and Principles in Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1002/9783527613106 · Cited by 4,107 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The simplex representation of molecular structure (SiRMS) approach was used to generate fragment descriptors, and the set of whole-molecule parameters([35]) describing the molecule as a whole along with some molecular fragments (topological, constitutional, connectivity, informational, 2D autocorrelations, molecular p…”
MethodWold, S., Ruhe, A., Wold, H., & Dunn, III (1984) · SIAM Journal on Scientific and Statistical Computing · doi:10.1137/0905052 · Cited by 2,529 · see citing works
Best Practices for QSAR Model Development, Validation, and Exploitation
Tropsha, A. (2010) · Molecular Informatics · doi:10.1002/minf.201000061 · Cited by 2,042 · see citing works
HANSCH, C., MALONEY, P. P., FUJITA, T., & MUIR, R. M. (1962) · Nature · doi:10.1038/194178b0 · Cited by 1,056 · see citing works
A Mathematical Contribution to Structure-Activity Studies
Free, S. M., & Wilson, J. W. (1964) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm00334a001 · Cited by 953 · see citing works
Bishop, C. (2004) · Institute of Physics eBooks · doi:10.1887/0750303123/b365c43 · Cited by 846 · see citing works
Fourches, D., Muratov, E., & Tropsha, A. (2010) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/ci100176x · Cited by 832 · see citing works
Self-citationDerivation and Validation of Toxicophores for Mutagenicity Prediction
Kazius, J., McGuire, R., & Bursi, R. (2004) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm040835a · Cited by 668 · see citing works
A New Atom-Additive Method for Calculating Partition Coefficients
Wang, R., Fu, Y., & Lai, L. (1997) · Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences · doi:10.1021/ci960169p · Cited by 423 · see citing works
QSAR Modelling of Rat Acute Toxicity on the Basis of PASS Prediction
Lagunin, A. A., Zakharov, A. V., Filimonov, D. A., & Poroikov, V. (2011) · Molecular Informatics · doi:10.1002/minf.201000151 · Cited by 380 · see citing works
Singer, B. C., & Kuśmierek, J. T. (1982) · Annual Review of Biochemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev.bi.51.070182.003255 · Cited by 377 · see citing works
Benchmark Data Set for in Silico Prediction of Ames Mutagenicity
Hansen, K., Mika, S., Schroeter, T. S., Sutter, A. P., ter Laak, A., Steger‐Hartmann, T., Heinrich, N., & Müller, K. (2009) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/ci900161g · Cited by 373 · see citing works
Estimation of Aqueous Solubility for a Diverse Set of Organic Compounds Based on Molecular Topology
Huuskonen, J. J. (2000) · Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences · doi:10.1021/ci9901338 · Cited by 307 · see citing works
Leach, A. G., Jones, H. D., Cosgrove, D. A., Kenny, P. W., Ruston, L., MacFaul, P. A., Wood, J. M., Colclough, N., & Law, B. (2006) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm0605233 · Cited by 283 · see citing works
Matched Molecular Pairs as a Medicinal Chemistry Tool: Miniperspective
Griffen, E., Leach, A. G., Robb, G. R., & Warner, D. J. (2011) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm200452d · Cited by 282 · see citing works
Application of Random Forest Approach to QSAR Prediction of Aquatic Toxicity
Полищук, П. Г., Muratov, E. N., Artemenko, A. G., Kolumbin, O. G., MURATOV, N. N., & Kuz’min, V. Е. (2009) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/ci900203n · Cited by 182 · see citing works
Self-citationJolly, W. L., & Perry, W. B. (1973) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja00798a002 · Cited by 162 · see citing works
Hierarchical QSAR technology based on the Simplex representation of molecular structure
Kuz’min, V. Е., Artemenko, A. G., & Muratov, E. N. (2008) · Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design · doi:10.1007/s10822-008-9179-6 · Cited by 153 · see citing works
Self-citationPapadatos, G., Alkarouri, M., Gillet, V. J., Willett, P., Kadirkamanathan, V., Luscombe, C. N., Bravi, G., Richmond, N. J., Pickett, S. D., Hussain, J., et al. (2010) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/ci100258p · Cited by 125 · see citing works
On the interpretation and interpretability of quantitative structure–activity relationship models
Guha, R. (2008) · Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design · doi:10.1007/s10822-008-9240-5 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
Interpreting Computational Neural Network QSAR Models: A Measure of Descriptor Importance
Guha, R., & Jurs, P. C. (2005) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/ci050022a · Cited by 98 · see citing works
Kuz’min, V. Е., Artemenko, A. G., Polischuk, P. G., Muratov, E. N., Hromov, A. I., Liahovsky, A. V., Andronati, S. A., & Makan, S. Y. (2005) · Journal of Molecular Modeling · doi:10.1007/s00894-005-0237-x · Cited by 98 · see citing works
Self-citationKuz’min, V. Е., Artemenko, A. G., LOZYTSKA, R., Fedtchouk, A. S., Lozitsky, V. P., Muratov, E. N., & Mescheriakov, A. K. (2005) · SAR and QSAR in environmental research · doi:10.1080/10659360500037206 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
Self-citationInterpretation of QSAR Models Based on Random Forest Methods
Kuz’min, V. Е., Полищук, П. Г., Artemenko, A. G., & Andronati, S. A. (2011) · Molecular Informatics · doi:10.1002/minf.201000173 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
Self-citationKuz’min, V. Е., Artemenko, A. G., Muratov, E. N., VOLINECKAYA, I., Makarov, V., Riabova, O., Wutzler, P., & Schmidtke, M. (2007) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm0704806 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Self-citationPrime, M. E., Andersen, O. A., Barker, J. J., et al. (2012) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm201310y · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Guha, R., Stanton, D. T., & Jurs, P. C. (2005) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/ci050110v · Cited by 67 · see citing works
On the Physical Interpretation of QSAR Models
Stanton, D. T. (2003) · Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences · doi:10.1021/ci0340658 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Interpretation of Nonlinear QSAR Models Applied to Ames Mutagenicity Data
Carlsson, L., Helgee, E. A., & Boyer, S. K. (2009) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/ci9002206 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
<i>Per Aspera Ad Astra</i> : Application of Simplex Qsar Approach in Antiviral Research
Muratov, E. N., Artemenko, A. G., Varlamova, E. V., Polischuk, P. G., Lozitsky, V. P., Fedchuk, A. S., Lozitska, R. L., Gridina, T. L., Koroleva, L. S., Sil’nikov, V. N., et al. (2010) · Future Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.4155/fmc.10.194 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
Self-citationDevelopment of QSAR Models To Predict and Interpret the Biological Activity of Artemisinin Analogues
Guha, R., & Jurs, P. C. (2004) · Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences · doi:10.1021/ci0499469 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Interpreting linear support vector machine models with heat map molecule coloring
Rosenbaum, L., Hinselmann, G., Jahn, A., & Zell, A. (2011) · Journal of Cheminformatics · doi:10.1186/1758-2946-3-11 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
An approach to the interpretation of backpropagation neural network models in QSAR studies
Baskin, I. I., Айт, А. О., Halberstam, N. M., Palyulin, V. A., & Зефиров, Н. С. (2002) · SAR and QSAR in environmental research · doi:10.1080/10629360290002073 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Potential industrial carcinogens and mutagens
Purchase, I. F. H. (1980) · Endeavour · doi:10.1016/0160-9327(80)90133-7 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
The effects of characteristics of substituents on toxicity of the nitroaromatics: HiT QSAR study
Kuz’min, V. Е., Muratov, E. N., Artemenko, A. G., Gorb, L., Qasim, M., & Leszczyński, J. (2008) · Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design · doi:10.1007/s10822-008-9211-x · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Self-citationA new approach to QSAR modelling of acute toxicity†
Lagunin, A. A., Zakharov, A. V., Filimonov, D. A., & Poroikov, V. (2007) · SAR and QSAR in environmental research · doi:10.1080/10629360701304253 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Knowledge-Oriented Applications in Data Mining
(2011) · InTech eBooks · doi:10.5772/1824 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Interpretability of SAR/QSAR Models of any Complexity by Atomic Contributions
Marcou, G., Horvath, D., Solov’ev, V. P., Arrault, A., Vayer, P., & Varnek, A. A. (2012) · Molecular Informatics · doi:10.1002/minf.201100136 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Artemenko, A. G., Muratov, E. N., Kuz’min, V. Е., Kovdienko, N. A., Hromov, A. I., Makarov, V., Riabova, O., Wutzler, P., & Schmidtke, M. (2007) · Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy · doi:10.1093/jac/dkm172 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Self-citationChemical Descriptors Are More Important Than Learning Algorithms for Modelling
Young, S. S., Yuan, F., & Zhu, M. (2012) · Molecular Informatics · doi:10.1002/minf.201200031 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Synthesis, antifungal activity and QSAR study of 2-arylhydroxynitroindoles
Kokurkina, G. V., Dutov, M. D., Shevelev, S. A., Попков, С. В., Zakharov, A. V., & Poroikov, V. (2011) · European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.ejmech.2011.07.008 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Larsen, S. B., Jørgensen, F. S., & Olsen, L. (2007) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/ci700346y · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Кузьмин, В. Е., Polischuk, P. G., Artemenko, A. G., et al. (2008) · SAR and QSAR in environmental research · doi:10.1080/10629360802085090 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
QSAR Modeling: Where have you been? Where are you going to?
Cherkasov, A., Muratov, E. N., Fourches, D., Varnek, A., Baskin, I. I., Cronin, M., Dearden, J., Gramatica, P., Martin, Y. C., Todeschini, R., et al. (2014) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm4004285 · Cited by 2,164 · see citing works
Self-citationMuratov, E. N., Bajorath, J., Sheridan, R. P., Tetko, I. V., Filimonov, D., Poroikov, V., Oprea, T. I., Baskin, I. I., Varnek, A., Roitberg, A., et al. (2020) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/d0cs00098a · Cited by 913 · see citing works
Self-citationConvolutional embedding of attributed molecular graphs for physical property prediction
Coley, C. W., Barzilay, R., Green, W. H., Jaakkola, T. S., & Jensen, K. F. (2017) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.6b00601 · Cited by 470 · see citing works
Interpretation of Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship Models: Past, Present, and Future
Polishchuk, P. (2017) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.7b00274 · Cited by 236 · see citing works
Self-citationMarchese Robinson, R. L., Palczewska, A., Palczewski, J., & Kidley, N. (2017) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.6b00753 · Cited by 167 · see citing works
Alarms about structural alerts
Alves, V. M., Muratov, E. N., Capuzzi, S. J., Politi, R., Low, Y., Braga, R. C., Zakharov, A. V., Sedykh, A., Mokshyna, E., Farag, S., et al. (2016) · Green Chemistry · doi:10.1039/c6gc01492e · Cited by 133 · see citing works
Self-citationColoring Molecules with Explainable Artificial Intelligence for Preclinical Relevance Assessment
Jiménez-Luna, J., Skalic, M., Weskamp, N., & Schneider, G. (2021) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.0c01344 · Cited by 96 · see citing works
Sheridan, R. P. (2019) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.8b00825 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
- Authors
- Polishchuk, P. G., Kuz'min, V. E., Artemenko, A. G., & Muratov, E. N.
- Affiliations
- National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine (UA)
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
- Venue
- Molecular Informatics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2013-09-16
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 9-10
- Pages
- 843-853
- ISSN
- 1868-1743 (ISSN-L)
- 1868-1751
- OpenAlex
- W2103252267
- Cited by
- 76
- References
- 47
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 4.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Molecular Informatics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- NIH (GM66940)
- EPA (RD 83382501, R832720)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Machine Learning in Materials Science
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Advanced Chemical Physics Studies
- Keywords
- QSPR, structural interpretation, molecular fragments, substructure analysis, Dragon descriptors, solubility, mutagenicity, structural alerts, black-box models, random forest, support vector machine, partial least squares
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review