The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Technical Note: Deep learning based MRAC using rapid ultrashort echo time imaging
Open accessAbstract
Purpose: In this study, we explore the feasibility of a novel framework for MR‐based attenuation correction for PET/MR imaging based on deep learning via convolutional neural networks, which enables fully automated and robust estimation of a pseudo CT image based on ultrashort echo time (UTE), fat, and water images obtained by a rapid MR acquisition. Methods: MR images for MRAC are acquired using dual echo ramped hybrid encoding (dRHE), where both UTE and out‐of‐phase echo images are obtained within a short single acquisition (35 s). Tissue labeling of air, soft tissue, and bone in the UTE image is accomplished via a deep learning network that was pre‐trained with T1‐weighted MR images. UTE images are used as input to the network, which was trained using labels derived from co‐registered CT images. The tissue labels estimated by deep learning are refined by a conditional random field based correction. The soft tissue labels are further separated into fat and water components using the two‐point Dixon method. The estimated bone, air, fat, and water images are then assigned appropriate Hounsfield units, resulting in a pseudo CT image for PET attenuation correction. To evaluate the proposed MRAC method, PET/MR imaging of the head was performed on eight human subjects, where Dice similarity coefficients of the estimated tissue labels and relative PET errors were evaluated through comparison to a registered CT image. Result: Dice coefficients for air (within the head), soft tissue, and bone labels were 0.76 ± 0.03, 0.96 ± 0.006, and 0.88 ± 0.01. In PET quantitation, the proposed MRAC method produced relative PET errors less than 1% within most brain regions. Conclusion: The proposed MRAC method utilizing deep learning with transfer learning and an efficient dRHE acquisition enables reliable PET quantitation with accurate and rapid pseudo CT generation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The VGG16 network has proven to be an effective and efficient network of feature extraction in many medical image applications, including tissue segmentation and image contrast conversion.
“More recently, the VGG16 network has proven to be an effective and efficient network of feature extraction in many medical image applications, including tissue segmentation (14,24–26) and image contrast conversion (27,28).”
From Deep learning approach for evaluating knee MR images: achieving high diagnostic performance for cartilage lesion detection. (2018) · cites this paper as [28]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks
Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., & Hinton, G. E. (2017) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3065386 · Cited by 112,155
U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentation
Ronneberger, O., Fischer, P., & Brox, T. (2015) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-24574-4_28 · Cited by 99,404
LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14539 · Cited by 84,126
What is the best multi-stage architecture for object recognition?
Jarrett, K., Kavukcuoglu, K., Ranzato, M. A., & LeCun, Y. (2009) · 2009 IEEE 12th International Conference on Computer Vision · doi:10.1109/iccv.2009.5459469 · Cited by 2,153
Automatic Segmentation of MR Brain Images With a Convolutional Neural Network
Moeskops, P., Viergever, M. A., Mendrik, A. M., de Vries, L. S., Benders, M. J. N. L., & Isgum, I. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2016.2548501 · Cited by 861
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 47
- 10.2967/jnumed.107.049353 · DOI
- 10.1109/TNS.2013.2273417 · DOI
- 10.1118/1.3377774 · DOI
- 10.2967/jnumed.110.078949 · DOI
- 10.2967/jnumed.110.085076 · DOI
- 10.1118/1.1569270 · DOI
- WagenknechtG KopsER TellmannL HerzogH.Knowledge‐based segmentation of attenuation‐relevant regions of the head in T1‐weighted MR images for attenuation correction in MR/PET systems.IEEE Nucl Sci Symp Conf Rec;2009:3338–3343. · DOI
- WagenknechtG KopsER KaffankeJ et al.CT‐based evaluation of segmented head regions for attenuation correction in MR‐PET systems.IEEE Nucl Sci Symp Conf Rec;2010:2793–2797. · DOI
- WagenknechtG RotaKops E MantlikF et al.Attenuation correction in MR‐BrainPET with segmented T1‐weighted MR images of the patient's head – a comparative study with CT.IEEE Nucl Sci Symp Conf Rec;2011:2261–2266. · DOI
- KopsER WagenknechtG ScheinsJ TellmannL HerzogH.Attenuation correction in MR‐PET scanners with segmented T1‐weighted MR images.IEEE Nucl Sci Symp Conf Rec;2009:2530–2533. · DOI
- HuZ OjhaN RenischS et al.MR‐based attenuation correction for a whole‐body sequential PET/MR system.IEEE Nucl Sci Symp Conf Rec;2009:3508–3512. · DOI
- 10.1007/s00259-010-1603-1 · DOI
- AkbarzadehA AyMR AhmadianA RiahiAlam N ZaidiH.Impact of using different tissue classes on the accuracy of MR‐based attenuation correction in PET‐MRI.IEEE Nucl Sci Symp Conf Rec;2011:2524–2530. · DOI
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.12.010 · DOI
- 10.2967/jnumed.109.065425 · DOI
- 10.2967/jnumed.111.092577 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.03.009 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.nima.2012.09.005 · DOI
- 10.1002/mp.12122 · DOI
- Wiesinger F, 2014, Zero TE MR bone imaging in the head, Magn Reson Med, 2015, 107
- LongJ ShelhamerE DarrellT.Fully Convolutional Networks for Semantic Segmentation. ArXiv e‐prints;2014:1411.
- 10.1109/TMI.2016.2553401 · DOI
- Litjens G, 1995, A survey on deep learning in medical image analysis, Med Image Anal, 2017, 60
- 10.1016/j.media.2016.01.005 · DOI
- 10.1109/TMI.2016.2538465 · DOI · Paper page
- Liu F, 2017, Deep convolutional neural network and 3D deformable approach for tissue segmentation in musculoskeletal magnetic resonance imaging, Magn Reson Med, 25, 5662
- ChristPF EttlingerF GrünF et al.Automatic liver and tumor segmentation of CT and MRI volumes using cascaded fully convolutional neural networks. ArXiv e‐prints; 2017: 1702.05970v2.
- 10.1148/radiol.2017170700 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/jmri.25877 · DOI · Paper page
- Zhao G, 2017, Bayesian convolutional neural network based MRI brain extraction on nonhuman primates, NeuroImage, 2018, 32
- 10.1002/mrm.27229 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/TPAMI.2016.2644615 · DOI · Paper page
- SimonyanK ZissermanA.Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large‐Scale Image Recognition. arXiv Prepr;2014:1–10.
- 10.1002/mrm.26953 · DOI
- 10.1002/mrm.25977 · DOI
- KrahenbuhlP KoltunV.Efficient inference in fully connected CRFs with Gaussian edge potentials. In:Neural Information Processing Systems;2011:109–117.
- 10.1109/42.75611 · DOI
- 10.1002/mrm.1910380606 · DOI
- JiaY ShelhamerE DonahueJ et al.Caffe: Convolutional Architecture for Fast Feature Embedding. ArXiv e‐prints;2014:1408. · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/TMI.2009.2035616 · DOI · Paper page
- Bottou L, 2010, Large‐scale machine learning with stochastic gradient descent, 19th Int Conf Comput Stat, 177
- 10.2967/jnumed.109.069112 · DOI
- 10.2967/jnumed.108.054726 · DOI
- 10.1007/s12149-012-0667-3 · DOI
- 10.1109/TMI.2005.848376 · DOI
- 10.1002/(SICI)1522-2594(200005)43:5<682::AID-MRM10>3.0.CO;2-G · DOI
- Wiesinger F, 2015, Zero TEMR bone imaging in the head, Magn Reson Med, 75
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Liu, F., Zhou, Z., Samsonov, A., Blankenbaker, D., Larison, W., Kanarek, A., Lian, K., Kambhampati, S., & Kijowski, R. (2018) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.2018172986 · Cited by 297
“More recently, the VGG16 network has proven to be an effective and efficient network of feature extraction in many medical image applications, including tissue segmentation (14,24–26) and image contrast conversion (27,28).”
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Jang, H., Liu, F., Zhao, G., Bradshaw, T., & McMillan, A. B.
- Affiliations
- University of California San Diego (US)
- University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
- Corresponding author
- Jang, Hyungseok
- Venue
- Medical Physics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2018-07-05
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 3697-3704
- ISSN
- 0094-2405 (ISSN-L)
- 2473-4209
- PMC
- PMC6443501
- OpenAlex
- W2804411736
- Cited by
- 60
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 4
- FWCI
- 5.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Medical Physics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering
- National Institutes of Health (1R21EB013770)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
- Keywords
- MR-based attenuation correction, PET/MR, ultrashort echo time MRI, pseudo-CT generation, convolutional neural networks, tissue labeling, transfer learning, PET quantification, head imaging
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review