The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sample designs and sampling methods for the Collaborative Psychiatric Epidemiology Studies (CPES)
Open accessAbstract
This paper provides an overview of the probability sample designs and sampling methods for the Collaborative Psychiatric Epidemiology Studies (CPES): the National Comorbidity Survey Replication (NCS‐R), the National Study of American Life (NSAL) and the National Latino and Asian American Study of Mental Health (NLAAS). The multi‐stage sample design and respondent selection procedures used in these three studies are based on the University of Michigan Survey Research Center's National Sample designs and operations. The paper begins with a general overview of these designs and procedures and then turns to a more detailed discussion of the adaptation of these general methods to the three specific study designs. The detailed discussions of the individual study samples focus on design characteristics and outcomes that are important to analysts of the CPES data sets and to researchers and statisticians who are planning future studies. The paper describes how the expected survey cost and error structure for each of these surveys influenced the original design of the samples and how actual field experience led to changes and adaptations to arrive at the final samples of each survey population. Copyright © 2004 Whurr Publishers Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Considering context, place, and culture: the national Latino and Asian American study
Alegria, M., Takeuchi, D., Canino, G., Duan, N., Shrout, P., Meng, X., Vega, W., Zane, N., Vila, D., Woo, M., et al. (2004) · International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1002/mpr.178 · Cited by 733
Self-citation
Cited by
McLean, C. P., Asnaani, A., Litz, B. T., & Hofmann, S. G. (2011) · Journal of Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2011.03.006 · Cited by 2,519
Socioeconomic Disparities in Health in the United States: What the Patterns Tell Us
Braveman, P. A., Cubbin, C., Egerter, S., Williams, D. R., & Pamuk, E. (2010) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.2009.166082 · Cited by 1,548
Prevalence of Mental Illness in Immigrant and Non-Immigrant U.S. Latino Groups
Alegría, M., Canino, G., Shrout, P. E., Woo, M., Duan, N., Vila, D., Torres, M., Chen, C.-N., & Meng, X.-L. (2008) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2007.07040704 · Cited by 1,018
Self-citationDisparity in Depression Treatment Among Racial and Ethnic Minority Populations in the United States
Alegría, M., Chatterji, P., Wells, K., Cao, Z., Chen, C.-N., Takeuchi, D., Jackson, J., & Meng, X.-L. (2008) · Psychiatric Services · doi:10.1176/ps.2008.59.11.1264 · Cited by 993
Prevalence of psychiatric disorders across Latino subgroups in the United States
Alegría, M., Mulvaney-Day, N., Torres, M., Polo, A., Cao, Z., & Canino, G. (2007) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.2006.087205 · Cited by 816
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Heeringa, S. G., Wagner, J., Torres, M., Duan, N., Adams, T., & Berglund, P.
- Venue
- International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-11
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 221-240
- ISSN
- 1049-8931 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-0657
- OpenAlex
- W2031789076
- Cited by
- 758
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 48.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.