Cited by 993Mental Health Treatment and AccessCultural Competency in Health CareHealth disparities and outcomes

Disparity in Depression Treatment Among Racial and Ethnic Minority Populations in the United States

Open access
Alegría, Margarita, Chatterji, Pinka, Wells, Kenneth, Cao, Zhun, Chen, Chih-nan, Takeuchi, David, Jackson, James, Meng, Xiao-Li·2008·Psychiatric Services

Abstract

Objective Prior research on racial and ethnic disparities in depression treatment has been limited by the scarcity of national samples that include an array of diagnostic and quality indicators and substantial numbers of non-English-speaking individuals from minority groups. Using nationally representative data for 8,762 persons, the authors evaluated differences in access to and quality of depression treatments between patients in racial-ethnic minority groups and non-Latino white patients. Methods Access to mental health care was assessed by past-year receipt of any mental health treatment. Adequate treatment for acute depression was defined as four or more specialty or general health provider visits in the past year plus antidepressant use for 30 days or more or eight or more specialty mental health provider visits lasting at least 30 minutes, with no antidepressant use. Results For persons with past-year depressive disorder, 63.7% of Latinos, 68.7% of Asians, and 58.8% of African Americans, compared with 40.2% of non-Latino whites, did not access any past-year mental health treatment (significantly different at p Conclusions Simply relying on present health care systems without consideration of the unique barriers to quality care that ethnic and racial minority populations face is unlikely to affect the pattern of disparities observed. Populations reluctant to visit a clinic for depression care may have correctly anticipated the limited quality of usual care.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1176/ps.2008.59.11.1264

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Alegría, M., Chatterji, P., Wells, K., Cao, Z., Chen, C.-N., Takeuchi, D., Jackson, J., & Meng, X.-L.
Venue
Psychiatric Services
Published
2008-11
Volume
59
Issue
11
Pages
1264-1272
ISSN
  • 0022-1597 (ISSN-L)
  • 1075-2730
  • 1557-9700
OpenAlex
W4247094702
Cited by
993
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 33 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 41 · 2023: 54 · 2022: 53 · 2021: 103 · 2020: 56 · 2019: 52 · 2018: 70 · 2017: 94 · 2016: 80 · 2015: 58 · 2014: 59 · 2013: 55 · 2012: 45
FWCI
42.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychiatric Services (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • John W. Alden Trust
  • National Institutes of Health
  • U.S. Public Health Service (044708)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH 57716, U01 MH06220, P50MH073469, MH60220, U01MH062209, U01MH060220, U01MH057716)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (K23DA018715)
  • Office of Behavioral and Social Sciences Research
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R24HD042828)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Cultural Competency in Health Care
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
Keywords
racial and ethnic disparities, depression treatment, access to mental health care, mental health care quality, Hispanic Americans, Asian Americans, African Americans, antidepressant use, mental health service utilization, barriers to care
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Depression, Ethnicity, Female, Health Services Accessibility, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Male, Middle Aged, Quality of Health Care, United States, Logistic Models, Health Care Surveys, Racial Groups, Healthcare Disparities, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review