The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Automated classification of short echo time in in vivo 1H brain tumor spectra: A multicenter study
Abstract
Automated pattern recognition techniques are needed to help radiologists categorize MRS data of brain tumors according to histological type and grade. A major question is whether a computer program “trained” on spectra from one hospital will be able to classify those from another, particularly if the acquisition protocol is different. A subset of 144 histopathologically validated brain tumor spectra in the INTERPRET database, obtained from three of the collaborating centers, was grouped into meningiomas, low‐grade astrocytomas, and “aggressive tumors” (glioblastomas and metastases). Spectra from two centers formed the training set (94 spectra) while the third acted as the test set (50 spectra). Linear discriminant analysis successfully classified 48/50 in the test set; the remaining two were atypical cases. When the training and test sets were combined, 133 of the 144 spectra were correctly classified using the leave‐one‐out procedure. These spectra had been obtained using different sequences (STEAM and PRESS), different echo times (20, 30, 31, and 32 ms), different repetition times (1600 and 2000 ms), and different manufacturers' instruments (GE and Philips). Pattern recognition algorithms are less sensitive to acquisition parameters than had been expected. Magn Reson Med 49:29–36, 2003. © 2003 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Zacharaki, E. I., Wang, S., Chawla, S., Soo Yoo, D., Wolf, R., Melhem, E. R., & Davatzikos, C. (2009) · Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · doi:10.1002/mrm.22147 · Cited by 855
Metabolic Fingerprinting As A Diagnostic Tool
Ellis, D. I., Dunn, W. B., Griffin, J. L., Allwood, J. W., & Goodacre, R. (2007) · Pharmacogenomics · doi:10.2217/14622416.8.9.1243 · Cited by 396
Deep learning approaches for detection and removal of ghosting artifacts in MR spectroscopy
Kyathanahally, S. P., Döring, A., & Kreis, R. (2018) · Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · doi:10.1002/mrm.27096 · Cited by 92
Metadata
- Authors
- Tate, A. R., Majós, C., Moreno, A., Howe, F. A., Griffiths, J. R., & Arús, C.
- Venue
- Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-12-31
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 29-36
- ISSN
- 0740-3194 (ISSN-L)
- 1522-2594
- OpenAlex
- W1998061827
- Cited by
- 174
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Automated classification of short echo time in in vivo 1H brain tumor spectra: A multicenter study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/mrm.10315
- The paper
- Tate, A. R., Majós, C., Moreno, A., Howe, F. A., Griffiths, J. R., & Arús, C. (2003). Automated classification of short echo time in in vivo 1H brain tumor spectra: A multicenter study. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.10315
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.