Cited by 92Advanced MRI Techniques and ApplicationsMetabolomics and Mass Spectrometry StudiesImage and Signal Denoising Methods

Deep learning approaches for detection and removal of ghosting artifacts in MR spectroscopy

Open access
Kyathanahally, Sreenath P., Döring, André, Kreis, Roland·2018·Magnetic Resonance in Medicine

Abstract

Purpose To make use of deep learning (DL) methods to detect and remove ghosting artifacts in clinical magnetic resonance spectra of human brain. Methods Deep learning algorithms, including fully connected neural networks, deep‐convolutional neural networks, and stacked what‐where auto encoders, were implemented to detect and correct MR spectra containing spurious echo ghost signals. The DL methods were trained on a huge database of simulated spectra with and without ghosting artifacts that represent complex variations of ghost‐ridden spectra, transformed to time‐frequency spectrograms. The trained model was tested on simulated and in vivo spectra. Results The preliminary results for ghost detection are very promising, reaching almost 100% accuracy, and the DL ghost removal methods show potential in simulated and in vivo spectra, but need further refinement and quantitative testing. Conclusions Ghosting artifacts in spectroscopy are problematic, as they superimpose with metabolites and lead to inaccurate quantification. Detection and removal of ghosting artifacts using traditional machine learning approaches with feature extraction/selection is difficult, as ghosts appear at different frequencies. Here, we show that DL methods perform extremely well for ghost detection if the spectra are treated as images in the form of time‐frequency representations. Further optimization for in vivo spectra will hopefully confirm their “ghostbusting” capacity. Magn Reson Med 80:851–863, 2018. © 2018 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/mrm.27096

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Deep learning methods have also been applied to MR artifact detection.

    “Deep learning methods has also been applied to MR artifact detection , e.g. poor quality spectra in MRSI [188]; detection and removal of ghosting artifacts in MR spectroscopy [189]; and automated reference-free detection of patient motion artifacts in MRI [190].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kyathanahally, S. P., Döring, A., & Kreis, R.
Affiliations
University of Bern (CH)
Corresponding author
Kreis, Roland
Venue
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-02
Volume
80
Issue
3
Pages
851-863
ISSN
  • 0740-3194 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-2594
OpenAlex
W2800950215
Cited by
92
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
6.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Magnetic Resonance in Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • BORIS (University Library Bern) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Open Access CRIS of the University of Bern
Funders
Swiss National Science Foundation (320030‐156952, 320030‐175984)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image and Signal Denoising Methods
Keywords
ghosting artifacts, MR spectroscopy, artifact detection, artifact removal, time-frequency spectrograms, deep convolutional neural networks, brain metabolites, spectral quantification
MeSH terms
Deep Learning, Algorithms, Brain, Computer Simulation, Humans, Image Enhancement, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy, Normal Distribution, Artifacts, Neural Networks, Computer, Signal-To-Noise Ratio, Healthy Volunteers, Gray Matter

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review