The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Comparison of diffusion‐ and T2‐weighted MRI for the early detection of cerebral ischemia and reperfusion in rats
Abstract
The sensitivity of diffusion‐weighted MRI was compared to that of T2‐weighted MRI following temporary middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCA‐0) for 33 min followed by 4 h of reperfusion in rats. Diffusion‐weighted spin‐echo images using strong gradients (b value of 1413 s/mm 2) demonstrated a significant increase in signal intensity in ischemic regions as early as 14 min after onset of ischemia in comparison to the normal, contralateral hemisphere (p < 0.05). This hyperintensity returned to baseline levels during reperfusion. T2‐weighted images showed no evidence of brain injury during the temporary occlusion. In three rats subjected to permanent MCA‐0, diffusion‐weighted MRI demonstrated an increased signal intensity on the first image following occlusion and continued to increase during the 4‐h observation period. T2‐weighted images failed to demonstrate significant injury until approximately 2 h after MCA‐O. Signal intensity ratios of ischemic to normal tissues were greater in the diffusion‐weighted images than in the T2‐weighted MR images at all time points (p < 0.05). Close anatomical correlation was found between the early and sustained increase in diffusion‐weighted MRI signal intensity and localization of infarcts seen on post‐mortem histopathology. © 1991 Academic Press. Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Reversible middle cerebral artery occlusion without craniectomy in rats.
Longa, E. Z., Weinstein, P. R., Carlson, S., & Cummins, R. (1989) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/01.str.20.1.84 · Cited by 7,463
Self-citationLe Bihan, D., Breton, E., Lallemand, D., Grenier, P., Cabanis, E., & Laval-Jeantet, M. (1986) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiology.161.2.3763909 · Cited by 3,912
Cited by
Looking into the functional architecture of the brain with diffusion MRI.
Le Bihan, D. (2003) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn1119 · Cited by 1,571
Diffusion tensor imaging and beyond
Tournier, J., Mori, S., & Leemans, A. (2011) · Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · doi:10.1002/mrm.22924 · Cited by 921
Diffusion MRI at 25: exploring brain tissue structure and function
Le Bihan, D., & Johansen-Berg, H. (2012) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.11.006 · Cited by 498
van Ewijk, H., Heslenfeld, D. J., Zwiers, M. P., Buitelaar, J. K., & Oosterlaan, J. (2012) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2012.01.003 · Cited by 377
Predominance of cellular edema in traumatic brain swelling in patients with severe head injuries
Marmarou, A., Signoretti, S., Fatouros, P. P., Portella, G., Aygok, G. A., & Bullock, M. R. (2006) · Journal of Neurosurgery · doi:10.3171/jns.2006.104.5.720 · Cited by 237
Metadata
- Authors
- Mintorovitch, J., Moseley, M. E., Chileuitt, L., Shimizu, H., Cohen, Y., & Weinstein, P. R.
- Venue
- Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1991-03
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 39-50
- ISSN
- 0740-3194 (ISSN-L)
- 1522-2594
- OpenAlex
- W1970231623
- Cited by
- 507
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 24.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.