Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 2,494

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The rician distribution of noisy mri data

Open access
Gudbjartsson, HáKon, Patz, Samuel·1995·Magnetic Resonance in Medicine

Abstract

The image intensity in magnetic resonance magnitude images in the presence of noise is shown to be governed by a Rician distribution. Low signal intensities (SNR < 2) are therefore biased due to the noise. it is shown how the underlying noise can be estimated from the images and a simple correction scheme is provided to reduce the bias. the noise characteristics in phase images are also studied and shown to be very different from those of the magnitude images. Common to both, however, is that the noise distributions are nearly Gaussian for SNR larger than two.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/mrm.1910340618

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 2,494

Metadata

Authors
Gudbjartsson, H., & Patz, S.
Venue
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1995-12
Volume
34
Issue
6
Pages
910-914
ISSN
  • 0740-3194 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-2594
OpenAlex
W2059784307
Cited by
2,494
References
0
FWCI
9.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The rician distribution of noisy mri data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/mrm.1910340618
The paper
Gudbjartsson, H., & Patz, S. (1995). The rician distribution of noisy mri data. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.1910340618

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.