Cited by 1,905Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and ApplicationsImage and Signal Denoising MethodsAdvanced MRI Techniques and Applications

Denoising of diffusion MRI using random matrix theory

Open access
Veraart, Jelle, Novikov, Dmitry S., Christiaens, Daan, Ades-aron, Benjamin, Sijbers, Jan, Fieremans, Els·2016·NeuroImage

Abstract

We introduce and evaluate a post-processing technique for fast denoising of diffusion-weighted MR images. By exploiting the intrinsic redundancy in diffusion MRI using universal properties of the eigenspectrum of random covariance matrices, we remove noise-only principal components, thereby enabling signal-to-noise ratio enhancements. This yields parameter maps of improved quality for visual, quantitative, and statistical interpretation. By studying statistics of residuals, we demonstrate that the technique suppresses local signal fluctuations that solely originate from thermal noise rather than from other sources such as anatomical detail. Furthermore, we achieve improved precision in the estimation of diffusion parameters and fiber orientations in the human brain without compromising the accuracy and spatial resolution.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.08.016

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • MRtrix3 offers image analysis methods less specific to dMRI, including image filtering and calculation, statistics, image denoising, Gibbs ringing suppression, intensity normalisation, and diffeomorphic image registration.

    “MRtrix3 also offers image analysis methods less specific to dMRI such as image filtering and calculation, statistics, image denoising (Veraart et al., 2016) and Gibbs ringing suppression (Kellner et al., 2016) , intensity normalisation (Raffelt et al., 2017a) and diffeomorphic image registration (Raffelt et al., 2011) .”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 54

  1. Aja-Fernández S Tristán-Vega A Hoge WS 2011 Statistical noise analysis in GRAPPA using a parametrized noncentral Chi approximation model Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 65 4 1195 1206 21413083 PMC3955201
  2. Basser PJ Mattiello J LeBihan D 1994 MR diffusion tensor spectroscopy and imaging Biophysical journal 66 1 259 267 8130344 PMC1275686
  3. Basser PJ Pajevic S 2000 Statistical artifacts in diffusion tensor MRI (DT-MRI) caused by background noise Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 44 1 41 50 10893520
  4. Blackledge MD Leach MO Collins DJ Koh DM 2011 Computed diffusion-weighted mr imaging may improve tumor detection Radiology 261 2 573 581 21852566
  5. Block KT Uecker M Frahm J 2008 Suppression of MRI truncation artifacts using total variation constrained data extrapolation International journal of biomedical imaging PMC2531202 18784847
  6. Buades A Coll B Morel J-M 2005 A non-local algorithm for image denoising Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. IEEE Computer Society Conference on 2 IEEE 60 65
  7. Chang LC Jones DK Pierpaoli C 2005 RESTORE: robust estimation of tensors by outlier rejection Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 53 5 1088 1095 15844157
  8. Coupé P Yger P Barillot C 2006 Fast non local means denoising for 3D MR images Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention–MICCAI 2006 Springer 33 40 17354753
  9. Deledalle C-A Salmon J Dalalyan AS 2011 Image denoising with patch based PCA: local versus global BMVC 1 10
  10. Dhollander T Veraart J Van Hecke W Maes F Sunaert S Sijbers J Suetens P 2011 Feasibility and advantages of diffusion weighted imaging atlas construction in q-space Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention–MICCAI 2011 Springer 166 173 21995026
  11. Ding Y Chung YC Simonetti OP 2010 A method to assess spatially variant noise in dynamic MR image series Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 63 3 782 789 20187185
  12. Efron B 1992 Bootstrap methods: another look at the jackknife Springer
  13. Foi A 2011 Noise estimation and removal in mr imaging: The variance-stabilization approach Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro, 2011 IEEE International Symposium on IEEE 1809 1814
  14. Glasser MF Sotiropoulos SN Wilson JA Coalson TS Fischl B Andersson JL Xu J Jbabdi S Webster M Polimeni JR 2013 The minimal preprocessing pipelines for the Human Connectome Project Neuroimage 80 105 124 23668970 PMC3720813
  15. Gudbjartsson H Patz S 1995 The Rician distribution of noisy MRI data Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 34 6 910 914 8598820 PMC2254141
  16. Hansen B Lund TE Sangill R Jespersen SN 2013 Experimentally and computationally fast method for estimation of a mean kurtosis Magnetic resonance in medicine 69 6 1754 1760 23589312
  17. Hansen B Lund TE Sangill R Stubbe E Finsterbusch J Jespersen SN 2015 Experimental considerations for fast kurtosis imaging Magnetic resonance in medicine PMC4882290 26608731
  18. Hotelling H 1933 Analysis of a complex of statistical variables into principal components Journal of educational psychology 24 6 417
  19. Jahani J Johnson G Kiselev VG Novikov DS 2013 Random matrix theory-based noise reduction for dynamic imaging: Application to DCE-MRI Proceedings 21th Scientific Meeting, International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine Salt Lake City, USA 3073
  20. Jelescu IO Veraart J Fieremans E Novikov DS 2016 Degeneracy in model parameter estimation for multi-compartmental diffusion in neuronal tissue NMR in Biomedicine 29 1 33 47 26615981 PMC4920129
  21. Jeurissen B Leemans A Jones DK Tournier JD Sijbers J 2011 Probabilistic fiber tracking using the residual bootstrap with constrained spherical deconvolution Human brain mapping 32 3 461 479 21319270 PMC6869960
  22. Johnson JB 1928 Thermal agitation of electricity in conductors Physical review 32 1 97
  23. Johnstone IM 2006 High dimensional statistical inference and random matrices arXiv preprint math/0611589 · arXiv
  24. Jones D Horsfield M Simmons A 1999 Optimal strategies for measuring diffusion in anisotropic systems by magnetic resonance imaging Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 42 10467296
  25. Jones DK 2003 Determining and visualizing uncertainty in estimates of fiber orientation from diffusion tensor MRI Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 49 1 7 12 12509814
  26. Jones DK 2010a Diffusion MRI: Theory, methods, and applications Oxford University Press
  27. Jones DK 2010b Precision and accuracy in diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging Topics in Magnetic Resonance Imaging 21 2 87 99 21613874
  28. Jones DK Basser PJ 2004 “Squashing peanuts and smashing pumpkins”: How noise distorts diffusion-weighted MR data Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 52 5 979 993 15508154
  29. Keil B Blau JN Biber S Hoecht P Tountcheva V Setsompop K Triantafyllou C Wald LL 2013 A 64-channel 3T array coil for accelerated brain MRI Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 70 1 248 258 22851312 PMC3538896
  30. Kellner E Dhital B Kiselev VG Reisert M 2015 Gibbs-ringing artifact removal based on local subvoxel-shifts Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 10.1002/mrm.26054 26745823 · DOI · Paper page
  31. Knoll F Bredies K Pock T Stollberger R 2011 Second order total generalized variation (TGV) for MRI Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 65 2 480 491 21264937 PMC4011128
  32. Koay CG Basser PJ 2006 Analytically exact correction scheme for signal extraction from noisy magnitude MR signals Journal of Magnetic Resonance 179 2 317 322 16488635
  33. Laloux L Cizeau P Bouchaud JP Potters M 1999 Noise dressing of financial correlation matrices Physical review letters 83 7 1467
  34. Manjón JV Carbonell-Caballero J Lull JJ García-Martí G Martí-Bonmatí L Robles M 2008 MRI denoising using non-local means Medical image analysis 12 4 514 523 18381247
  35. Manjón JV Coupé P Buades A 2015 MRI noise estimation and denoising using non-local PCA Medical image analysis 22 1 35 47 25725303
  36. Manjón JV Coupé P Concha L Buades A Collins DL Robles M 2013 Diffusion weighted image denoising using overcomplete local PCA PloS one 8 9 e73021 24019889 PMC3760829
  37. Manjón JV Coupé P Martí-Bonmatí L Collins DL Robles M 2010 Adaptive non-local means denoising of MR images with spatially varying noise levels Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging 31 1 192 203 20027588
  38. Nyquist H 1928 Thermal agitation of electric charge in conductors Physical review 32 1 110
  39. Orchard J Ebrahimi M Wong A 2008 Efficient nonlocal-means denoising using the SVD Image Processing, 2008. ICIP 2008. 15th IEEE International Conference on IEEE 1732 1735
  40. Perrone D Aelterman J Pižurica A Jeurissen B Philips W Leemans A 2015 The effect of Gibbs ringing artifacts on measures derived from diffusion MRI NeuroImage 120 441 455 26142273
  41. Poot DHJ den Dekker AJ Achten E Verhoye M Sijbers J 2010 Optimal experimental design for diffusion kurtosis imaging Medical Imaging, IEEE Transactions on 29 3 819 829 20199917
  42. Rajan J Jeurissen B Verhoye M Van Audekerke J Sijbers J 2011 Maximum likelihood estimation-based denoising of magnetic resonance images using restricted local neighborhoods Physics in Medicine and biology 56 16 5221 21791732
  43. Rajan J Veraart J Van Audekerke J Verhoye M Sijbers J 2012 Nonlocal maximum likelihood estimation method for denoising multiplecoil magnetic resonance images Magnetic Resonance imaging 30 10 1512 1518 22819583
  44. Sengupta AM Mitra PP 1999 Distributions of singular values for some random matrices Physical Review E 60 3 3389 11970154
  45. Sotiropoulos SN Jbabdi S Xu J 2013 Advances in diffusion MRI acquisition and processing in the Human Connectome Project Neuroimage 80 125 143 23702418 PMC3720790
  46. Tax CM Jeurissen B Vos SB Viergever MA Leemans A 2014 Recursive calibration of the fiber response function for spherical deconvolution of diffusion mri data Neuroimage 86 67 80 23927905
  47. Tournier J Calamante F Connelly A 2012 MRtrix: diffusion tractography in crossing fiber regions International Journal of Imaging Systems and Technology 22 1 53 66
  48. Tournier JD Calamante F Connelly A 2007 Robust determination of the fibre orientation distribution in diffusion MRI: non-negativity constrained super-resolved spherical deconvolution NeuroImage 35 4 1459 1472 17379540
  49. Veraart J Fieremans E Jelescu IO Knoll F Novikov DS 2015 Gibbs ringing in diffusion MRI Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 10.1002/mrm.25866 PMC4915073 26257388 · DOI
  50. Veraart J Fieremans E Novikov DS 2016 Diffusion MRI noise mapping using random matrix theory Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 10.1002/mrm.26059 PMC4879661 26599599 · DOI
  51. Veraart J Poot DHJ Van Hecke W Blockx I Van der Linden A Verhoye M Sijbers J 2011a More accurate estimation of diffusion tensor parameters using diffusion kurtosis imaging Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 65 1 138 145 URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrm.22603 20878760 · DOI
  52. Veraart J Rajan J Peeters RR Leemans A Sunaert S Sijbers J 2013a Comprehensive framework for accurate diffusion MRI parameter estimation Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 70 4 972 984 URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrm.24529 23132517 · DOI
  53. Veraart J Sijbers J Sunaert S Leemans A Jeurissen B 2013b Weighted linear least squares estimation of diffusion MRI parameters: strengths, limitations, and pitfalls NeuroImage 81 335 346 23684865
  54. Veraart J Van Hecke W Sijbers J 2011b Constrained maximum likelihood estimation of the diffusion kurtosis tensor using a Rician noise model Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 66 3 678 686 URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrm.22835 21416503 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Veraart, J., Novikov, D. S., Christiaens, D., Ades-aron, B., Sijbers, J., & Fieremans, E.
Affiliations
  • University of Antwerp (BE)
  • New York University (US)
  • KU Leuven (BE)
Corresponding author
Veraart, Jelle
Venue
NeuroImage
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-11
Volume
142
Pages
394-406
ISSN
1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2508982726
Cited by
1,905
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 243 · 2025: 336 · 2024: 268 · 2023: 230 · 2022: 252 · 2021: 235 · 2020: 157 · 2019: 108 · 2018: 53 · 2017: 20 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
52.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Lirias (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • Raymond and Beverly Sackler Laboratories for Convergence of Physical, Engineering and Biomedical Sciences
  • Litwin Foundation for Alzheimer's Research
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS088040)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image and Signal Denoising Methods
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
Keywords
diffusion MRI, image denoising, random matrix theory, signal-to-noise ratio improvement, diffusion parameter estimation, fiber orientation estimation, thermal noise
MeSH terms
Data Interpretation, Statistical, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Principal Component Analysis, Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging, White Matter

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review