Cited by 1,635Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and ApplicationsAdvanced MRI Techniques and ApplicationsFunctional Brain Connectivity Studies

Direct estimation of the fiber orientation density function from diffusion-weighted MRI data using spherical deconvolution

Tournier, J.-Donald, Calamante, Fernando, Gadian, David G., Connelly, Alan·2004·NeuroImage

Abstract

Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging can provide information related to the arrangement of white matter fibers. The diffusion tensor is the model most commonly used to derive the orientation of the fibers within a voxel. However, this model has been shown to fail in regions containing several fiber populations with distinct orientations. A number of alternative models have been suggested, such as multiple tensor fitting, q-space, and Q-ball imaging. However, each of these has inherent limitations. In this study, we propose a novel method for estimating the fiber orientation distribution directly from high angular resolution diffusion-weighted MR data without the need for prior assumptions regarding the number of fiber populations present. We assume that all white matter fiber bundles in the brain share identical diffusion characteristics, thus implicitly assigning any differences in diffusion anisotropy to partial volume effects. The diffusion-weighted signal attenuation measured over the surface of a sphere can then be expressed as the convolution over the sphere of a response function (the diffusion-weighted attenuation profile for a typical fiber bundle) with the fiber orientation density function (ODF). The fiber ODF (the distribution of fiber orientations within the voxel) can therefore be obtained using spherical deconvolution. The properties of the technique are demonstrated using simulations and on data acquired from a volunteer using a standard 1.5-T clinica…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.07.037

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some researchers using constrained spherical deconvolution for fibre tracking have divided the cingulum three-ways into subgenual, retrosplenial (supracallosal), and parahippocampal (ventral) components.

    “Other researchers using the constrained spherical deconvolution algorithm (Tournier et al., 2004) for fibre tracking have divided the tract three-ways, e.g., into its ‘subgenual’, ‘retrosplenial’ (supracallosal), and ‘parahippocampal’ (ventral) components (Jones et al., 2013; see Fig. 6C).”

    From The cingulum bundle: Anatomy, function, and dysfunction (2018) · cites this paper as Tournier et al., 2004

  • The TDF model addresses well-established limitations of the standard single-tensor diffusion model, which cannot resolve complex profiles of WM architecture such as crossing or mixing fibers, present in up to 90% of WM voxels.

    “The TDF model addresses well-established limitations of the standard single-tensor diffusion model—which cannot resolve complex profiles of WM architecture such as crossing or mixing fibers, present in up to 90% of WM voxels (Tournier et al., 2004; Descoteaux et al., 2007, 2009; Jeurissen et al., 2013).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tournier, J.-D., Calamante, F., Gadian, D. G., & Connelly, A.
Affiliations
Great Ormond Street Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
Tournier, J.-Donald
Venue
NeuroImage
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-11
Volume
23
Issue
3
Pages
1176-1185
ISSN
1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2034252184
Cited by
1,635
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 56 · 2025: 80 · 2024: 79 · 2023: 87 · 2022: 100 · 2021: 97 · 2020: 102 · 2019: 103 · 2018: 97 · 2017: 117 · 2016: 80 · 2015: 94 · 2014: 64 · 2013: 84 · 2012: 75
FWCI
22.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust
  • Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children
  • Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
Keywords
spherical deconvolution, diffusion-weighted imaging, high angular resolution diffusion MRI, white matter fiber bundles, partial volume effect, tractography
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Brain, Computer Simulation, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Nerve Fibers, Anisotropy, Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review