Biexponential diffusion attenuation in various states of brain tissue: Implications for diffusion-weighted imaging
Abstract
Diffusion-weighted single voxel experiments conducted at b-values up to 1 x 10(4) smm-2 yielded biexponential signal attenuation curves for both normal and ischemic brain. The relative fractions of the rapidly and slowly decaying components (f1, f2) are f1 = 0.80 +/- 0.02, f2 = 0.17 +/- 0.02 in healthy adult rat brain and f1 = 0.90 +/- 0.02, f2 = 0.11 +/- 0.01 in normal neonatal rat brain, whereas the corresponding values for the postmortem situation are f1 = 0.69 +/- 0.02, f2 = 0.33 +/- 0.02. It is demonstrated that the changes in f1 and f2 occur simultaneously to those in the extracellular and intracellular space fractions (fex, f(in)) during: (i) cell swelling after total circulatory arrest, and (ii) the recovery from N-methyl-D-aspartate induced excitotoxic brain edema evoked by MK-801, as measured by changes in the electrical impedance. Possible reasons for the discrepancy between the estimated magnitude components and the physiological values are presented and evaluated. Implications of the biexponential signal attenuation curves for diffusion-weighted imaging experiments are discussed.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Early approaches attempted to model curvature in diffusion signal decay arising from co-existence of multiple compartments, sometimes without assigning each component to a specific microstructural entity.
“Early approaches attempted to model curvature in diffusion signal decay arising from co-existence of multiple compartments (Stanisz et al., 1997), sometimes without assigning each component to a specific microstructural entity (Le Bihan, 1995, 2007; Niendorf et al., 1996).”
From 40 Years of diffusion MRI in the brain: From history to emerging frontiers (2026) · cites this paper as Niendorf et al., 1996
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The basis of anisotropic water diffusion in the nervous system—A technical review.
Beaulieu, C. (2002) · NMR in Biomedicine · doi:10.1002/nbm.782 · Cited by 4,653 · see citing works
Diffusion tensor imaging: Concepts and applications
Le Bihan, D., Mangin, J., Poupon, C., Clark, C. A., Pappata, S., Molko, N., & Chabriat, H. (2001) · Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging · doi:10.1002/jmri.1076 · Cited by 3,547 · see citing works
White matter integrity, fiber count, and other fallacies: The do's and don'ts of diffusion MRI
Jones, D. K., Knösche, T. R., & Turner, R. (2013) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.06.081 · Cited by 2,479 · see citing works
Analysis of partial volume effects in diffusion‐tensor MRI
Alexander, A. L., Hasan, K. M., Lazar, M., Tsuruda, J. S., & Parker, D. L. (2001) · Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · doi:10.1002/mrm.1105 · Cited by 695 · see citing works
White matter characterization with diffusional kurtosis imaging
Fieremans, E., Jensen, J. H., & Helpern, J. A. (2011) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.06.006 · Cited by 561 · see citing works
Jbabdi, S., Sotiropoulos, S. N., Savio, A. M., Graña, M., & Behrens, T. E. J. (2012) · Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · doi:10.1002/mrm.24204 · Cited by 399 · see citing works
Compartment models of the diffusion MR signal in brain white matter: A taxonomy and comparison
Panagiotaki, E., Schneider, T., Siow, B., Hall, M. G., Lythgoe, M. F., & Alexander, D. C. (2012) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.09.081 · Cited by 422 · see citing works
Direct and fast detection of neuronal activation in the human brain with diffusion MRI
Le Bihan, D., Urayama, S.-I., Aso, T., Hanakawa, T., & Fukuyama, H. (2006) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0600644103 · Cited by 272 · see citing works
40 Years of diffusion MRI in the brain: From history to emerging frontiers
Le Bihan, D. (2026) · Imaging Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/imag.a.1365
- Authors
- Niendorf, T., Dijkhuizen, R. M., Norris, D. G., van Lookeren Campagne, M., & Nicolay, K.
- Affiliations
- University of Bremen (DE)
- University Medical Center Utrecht (NL)
- Utrecht University (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Niendorf, Thoralf
- Venue
- Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1996-12
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 847-857
- ISSN
- 0740-3194 (ISSN-L)
- 1522-2594
- OpenAlex
- W2049685486
- Cited by
- 570
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 28 · 2013: 30 · 2012: 25
- FWCI
- 7.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Magnetic Resonance in Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- MDC Repository (Max-Delbrueck-Center for Molecular Medicine) (submittedVersion)
- MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › NMR spectroscopy and applications
- Keywords
- diffusion-weighted imaging, brain tissue, ischemic brain, cell swelling, NMDA receptor, MK-801, electrical impedance, postmortem changes, neonatal brain, circulatory arrest, rat brain
- MeSH terms
- Age Factors, Animals, Animals, Newborn, Brain Edema, Brain Ischemia, Diffusion, Extracellular Space, Intracellular Fluid, Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy, Water, N-Methylaspartate, Dizocilpine Maleate, Electric Impedance, Rats, Wistar, Excitatory Amino Acid Agonists, Excitatory Amino Acid Antagonists, Phantoms, Imaging, Rats
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review