Cited by 561Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and ApplicationsAdvanced MRI Techniques and ApplicationsNMR spectroscopy and applications

White matter characterization with diffusional kurtosis imaging

Open access
Fieremans, Els, Jensen, Jens H., Helpern, Joseph A.·2011·NeuroImage

Abstract

Diffusional kurtosis imaging (DKI) is a clinically feasible extension of diffusion tensor imaging that probes restricted water diffusion in biological tissues using magnetic resonance imaging. Here we provide a physically meaningful interpretation of DKI metrics in white matter regions consisting of more or less parallel aligned fiber bundles by modeling the tissue as two non-exchanging compartments, the intra-axonal space and extra-axonal space. For the b-values typically used in DKI, the diffusion in each compartment is assumed to be anisotropic Gaussian and characterized by a diffusion tensor. The principal parameters of interest for the model include the intra- and extra-axonal diffusion tensors, the axonal water fraction and the tortuosity of the extra-axonal space. A key feature is that these can be determined directly from the diffusion metrics conventionally obtained with DKI. For three healthy young adults, the model parameters are estimated from the DKI metrics and shown to be consistent with literature values. In addition, as a partial validation of this DKI-based approach, we demonstrate good agreement between the DKI-derived axonal water fraction and the slow diffusion water fraction obtained from standard biexponential fitting to high b-value diffusion data. Combining the proposed WM model with DKI provides a convenient method for the clinical assessment of white matter in health and disease and could potentially provide important information on neurodegenerative disorders.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.06.006

Cites

71 of 71 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Interpreting MRI alterations in AD remains challenging because MRI contrasts reflect complex, combined contributions from cellular composition, microstructural organization, and biochemical changes rather than disease-specific processes alone, and provide only indirect measurements of underlying physiological mechanisms.

    “Interpreting MRI alterations in AD remains challenging because MRI contrasts reflect complex, combined contributions from cellular composition, microstructural organization, and biochemical changes rather than disease‐specific processes alone, 26 , 79 , 80 and provide only indirect measurements of underlying physiological mechanisms. 81”

    From Diffusion MRI reveals amyloid plaque–associated cellular signatures through spatial transcriptomic integration (2026) · cites this paper as [26]

    The Introduction (page unavailable) says diffusion MRI is affected by tissue barriers, their orientation and permeability, and various cell types; it also notes that diffusion tensor imaging lacks specificity to histological features. This supports the microstructural-complexity point, but the paper does not establish the claim about biochemical changes or interpreting MRI alterations specifically in Alzheimer’s disease. The separate claim about indirect measurements is attached to citation 81, not this source. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • DKI extends DTI by quantifying non-Gaussian diffusion and is therefore sensitive to microstructural heterogeneity and restricted diffusion arising from complex tissue architecture.

    “DKI extends DTI by quantifying non‐Gaussian diffusion and is therefore sensitive to microstructural heterogeneity and restricted diffusion arising from complex tissue architecture.”
  • Recent years have seen a marked proliferation of biophysical models with the explicit aim of clinically feasible data acquisition.

    “Recent years have seen a marked proliferation of biophysical models with the explicit aim of clinically feasible data acquisition (single-diffusion encoding, b-values up to 2000-3000 s/mm 2 , diffusion time 20-100 ms) (Fieremans et al., 2011;Hansen et al., 2017;Kaden et al., 2016;Zhang et al., 2012).”

    From NODDI in clinical research (2020) · cites this paper as Fieremans et al., 2011

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Fieremans E Jensen J Tabesh A Hu C Helpern J White matter model for diffusional kurtosis imaging. 2010a 1596 Proceedings of the 18th Annual Meeting of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine Stockholm, Sweden

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fieremans, E., Jensen, J. H., & Helpern, J. A.
Affiliations
  • New York University (US)
  • NYU Langone Health (US)
Corresponding author
Fieremans, Els
Venue
NeuroImage
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-09
Volume
58
Issue
1
Pages
177-188
ISSN
1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2142018683
Cited by
561
References
71
Citations by year
2026: 25 · 2025: 42 · 2024: 39 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 49 · 2021: 51 · 2020: 52 · 2019: 50 · 2018: 62 · 2017: 43 · 2016: 39 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 8
FWCI
12.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute on Aging (R01AG027852, P30AG008051)
  • National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (R01EB007656)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › NMR spectroscopy and applications
Keywords
diffusion kurtosis imaging, white matter, restricted diffusion, biexponential fitting, diffusion tensor imaging, neurodegenerative diseases
MeSH terms
Adult, Algorithms, Axons, Body Water, Brain, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Male, Models, Neurological, Nerve Fibers, Normal Distribution, Diffusion Tensor Imaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review