The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Quantitation of intrinsic magnetic susceptibility‐related effects in a tissue matrix. Phantom study
Abstract
A theoretical background and experimental method that allows a separation of intrinsic, tissue‐matrix‐specific magnetic‐field inhomogeneity effects from both macroscopic (large compared with voxel dimensions) and microscopic (on the order of molecular dimensions) inhomogeneities is proposed. Such separation allows one to take full advantage of these tissue‐matrix‐specific magnetic field inhomogeneity effects to extract information about tissue structure. A method to measure the volume fraction occupied by the susceptibility‐perturbing component in a tissue matrix, the R2′ relaxation rate constant, and the susceptibility difference between the bulk component and the susceptibility‐perturbing component in a tissue matrix has been developed and tested on phantoms. This method offers the potential to assess a variety of tissue parameters, including cerebral blood volume, blood volume and blood oxygenation‐level changes in functional MRI, the structure of trabecular bone, and other physiologically important issues.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Functional mapping of the human visual cortex by magnetic resonance imaging
Belliveau, J. W., Kennedy, D. N., McKinstry, R. C., Buchbinder, B. R., Weisskoff, R. M., Cohen, M. S., Vevea, J. M., Brady, T. J., & Rosen, B. R. (1991) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1948051 · Cited by 1,883
Cited by
Advances in diffusion MRI acquisition and processing in the Human Connectome Project
Sotiropoulos, S. N., Jbabdi, S., Xu, J., Andersson, J. L., Moeller, S., Auerbach, E. J., Glasser, M. F., Hernandez, M., Sapiro, G., Jenkinson, M., et al. (2013) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.05.057 · Cited by 891
Spees, W. M., Yablonskiy, D. A., Oswood, M. C., & Ackerman, J. J. H. (2001) · Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · doi:10.1002/mrm.1072 · Cited by 461
Self-citationHe, X., & Yablonskiy, D. A. (2007) · Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · doi:10.1002/mrm.21108 · Cited by 396
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Yablonskiy, D. A.
- Venue
- Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1998-03
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 417-428
- ISSN
- 0740-3194 (ISSN-L)
- 1522-2594
- OpenAlex
- W2015363282
- Cited by
- 245
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quantitation of intrinsic magnetic susceptibility‐related effects in a tissue matrix. Phantom study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/mrm.1910390312
- The paper
- Yablonskiy, D. A. (1998). Quantitation of intrinsic magnetic susceptibility‐related effects in a tissue matrix. Phantom study. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.1910390312
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
