The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Modified Look‐Locker inversion recovery (MOLLI) for high‐resolution T1 mapping of the heart
Open accessAbstract
A novel pulse sequence scheme is presented that allows the measurement and mapping of myocardial T1 in vivo on a 1.5 Tesla MR system within a single breath‐hold. Two major modifications of conventional Look‐Locker (LL) imaging are introduced: 1) selective data acquisition, and 2) merging of data from multiple LL experiments into one data set. Each modified LL inversion recovery (MOLLI) study consisted of three successive LL inversion recovery (IR) experiments with different inversion times. We acquired images in late diastole using a single‐shot steady‐state free‐precession (SSFP) technique, combined with sensitivity encoding to achieve a data acquisition window of <200 ms duration. We calculated T1 using signal intensities from regions of interest and pixel by pixel. T1 accuracy at different heart rates derived from simulated ECG signals was tested in phantoms. T1 estimates showed small systematic error for T1 values from 191 to 1196 ms. In vivo T1 mapping was performed in two healthy volunteers and in one patient with acute myocardial infarction before and after administration of Gd‐DTPA. T1 values for myocardium and noncardiac structures were in good agreement with values available from the literature. The region of infarction was clearly visualized. MOLLI provides high‐resolution T1 maps of human myocardium in native and post‐contrast situations within a single breath‐hold. Magn Reson Med 52:141–146, 2004. © 2004 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Bleeker, G. B., Kaandorp, T. A. M., Lamb, H. J., Boersma, E., Steendijk, P., de Roos, A., van der Wall, E. E., Schalij, M. J., & Bax, J. J. (2006) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.105.543678 · Cited by 760
Messroghli, D. R., Greiser, A., Fröhlich, M., Dietz, R., & Schulz‐Menger, J. (2007) · Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging · doi:10.1002/jmri.21119 · Cited by 353
Self-citationLiu, C.-Y., Liu, Y.-C., Wu, C., Armstrong, A., Volpe, G. J., van der Geest, R. J., Liu, Y., Hundley, W. G., Gomes, A. S., Liu, S., et al. (2013) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2013.05.078 · Cited by 349
Magnetic resonance multitasking for motion-resolved quantitative cardiovascular imaging
Christodoulou, A. G., Shaw, J. L., Nguyen, C., Yang, Q., Xie, Y., Wang, N., & Li, D. (2018) · Nature Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1038/s41551-018-0217-y · Cited by 323
Repeatability and reproducibility of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging of the liver
Bachtiar, V., Kelly, M. D., Wilman, H. R., Jacobs, J., Newbould, R., Kelly, C. J., Gyngell, M. L., Groves, K. E., McKay, A., Herlihy, A. H., et al. (2019) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0214921 · Cited by 117
Metadata
- Authors
- Messroghli, D. R., Radjenovic, A., Kozerke, S., Higgins, D. M., Sivananthan, M. U., & Ridgway, J. P.
- Venue
- Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-06-28
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 141-146
- ISSN
- 0740-3194 (ISSN-L)
- 1522-2594
- OpenAlex
- W2117892932
- Cited by
- 1,349
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Modified Look‐Locker inversion recovery (MOLLI) for high‐resolution T1 mapping of the heart. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/mrm.20110
- The paper
- Messroghli, D. R., Radjenovic, A., Kozerke, S., Higgins, D. M., Sivananthan, M. U., & Ridgway, J. P. (2004). Modified Look‐Locker inversion recovery (MOLLI) for high‐resolution T1 mapping of the heart. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.20110
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.