The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Q‐ball reconstruction of multimodal fiber orientations using the spherical harmonic basis
Abstract
Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) accurately delineates white matter pathways when the Gaussian model of diffusion is valid. However, DTI yields erroneous results when diffusion takes on a more complex distribution, as is the case in the brain when fiber tracts cross. High angular resolution diffusion imaging (HARDI) overcomes this limitation of DTI by more fully characterizing the angular dependence of intravoxel diffusion. Among the various HARDI methods that have been proposed, QBI offers advantages such as linearity, model independence, and relatively easy implementation. In this work, reconstruction of the q‐ball orientation distribution function (ODF) is reformulated in terms of spherical harmonic basis functions, yielding an analytic solution with useful properties of a frequency domain representation. The harmonic basis is parsimonious for typical b‐values, which enables the ODF to be synthesized from a relatively small number of noisy measurements and thus brings the technique closer to clinical feasibility from the standpoint of total imaging time. The proposed method is assessed using Monte Carlo computer simulations and compared with conventional q‐ball reconstruction using spherical RBFs. In vivo results from 3T whole‐brain HARDI of adult volunteers are also provided to verify the underlying mathematical theory. Magn Reson Med, 2006. © 2006 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The basis of anisotropic water diffusion in the nervous system—A technical review.
Beaulieu, C. (2002) · NMR in Biomedicine · doi:10.1002/nbm.782 · Cited by 4,628
Tuch, D. S. (2004) · Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · doi:10.1002/mrm.20279 · Cited by 1,880
High angular resolution diffusion imaging reveals intravoxel white matter fiber heterogeneity
Tuch, D. S., Reese, T. G., Wiegell, M. R., Makris, N., Belliveau, J. W., & Wedeen, V. J. (2002) · Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · doi:10.1002/mrm.10268 · Cited by 1,548
Campbell, J. S. W., Siddiqi, K., Rymar, V. V., Sadikot, A. F., & Pike, G. B. (2005) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.05.014 · Cited by 177
Cited by
Dipy, a library for the analysis of diffusion MRI data
Garyfallidis, E., Brett, M., Amirbekian, B., Rokem, A., van der Walt, S., Descoteaux, M., Nimmo-Smith, I., & Contributors, D. (2014) · Frontiers in Neuroinformatics · doi:10.3389/fninf.2014.00008 · Cited by 1,371
Whole-brain anatomical networks: does the choice of nodes matter?
Zalesky, A., Fornito, A., Harding, I. H., Cocchi, L., Yücel, M., Pantelis, C., & Bullmore, E. T. (2010) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.12.027 · Cited by 1,169
Regularized, fast, and robust analytical Q-ball imaging
Descoteaux, M., Angelino, E., Fitzgibbons, S., & Deriche, R. (2007) · Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · doi:10.1002/mrm.21277 · Cited by 850
A network diffusion model of disease progression in dementia
Raj, A., Kuceyeski, A., & Weiner, M. (2012) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2011.12.040 · Cited by 723
Deterministic and probabilistic tractography based on complex fibre orientation distributions
Descoteaux, M., Deriche, R., Knosche, T. R., & Anwander, A. (2009) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2008.2004424 · Cited by 698
Metadata
- Authors
- Hess, C. P., Mukherjee, P., Han, E. T., Xu, D., & Vigneron, D. B.
- Venue
- Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-06-05
- Volume
- 56
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 104-117
- ISSN
- 0740-3194 (ISSN-L)
- 1522-2594
- OpenAlex
- W1984932365
- Cited by
- 366
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 21.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.