Cited by 698Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and ApplicationsFunctional Brain Connectivity StudiesMedical Image Segmentation Techniques

Deterministic and probabilistic tractography based on complex fibre orientation distributions

Open access
Descoteaux, M., Deriche, R., Knosche, T.R., Anwander, A.·2009·IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging

Abstract

We propose an integral concept for tractography to describe crossing and splitting fibre bundles based on the fibre orientation distribution function (ODF) estimated from high angular resolution diffusion imaging (HARDI). We show that in order to perform accurate probabilistic tractography, one needs to use a fibre ODF estimation and not the diffusion ODF. We use a new fibre ODF estimation obtained from a sharpening deconvolution transform (SDT) of the diffusion ODF reconstructed from q-ball imaging (QBI). This SDT provides new insight into the relationship between the HARDI signal, the diffusion ODF, and the fibre ODF. We demonstrate that the SDT agrees with classical spherical deconvolution and improves the angular resolution of QBI. Another important contribution of this paper is the development of new deterministic and new probabilistic tractography algorithms using the full multidirectional information obtained through use of the fibre ODF. An extensive comparison study is performed on human brain datasets comparing our new deterministic and probabilistic tracking algorithms in complex fibre crossing regions. Finally, as an application of our new probabilistic tracking, we quantify the reconstruction of transcallosal fibres intersecting with the corona radiata and the superior longitudinal fasciculus in a group of eight subjects. Most current diffusion tensor imaging (DTI)-based methods neglect these fibres, which might lead to incorrect interpretations of brain functions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tmi.2008.2004424

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The DTI model cannot differentiate tissue compartments or crossing fibers, which are estimated to occur in up to 90% of white matter voxels at typical dMRI resolution.

    “The DTI model cannot differentiate these components or even crossing fibers (Tuch et al., 2002; Jbabdi et al., 2010), which are estimated to occur in up to 90% of WM voxels at the typical dMRI resolution (Descoteaux et al., 2009; Jeurissen et al., 2013).”

    From Diffusion MRI Indices and Their Relation to Cognitive Impairment in Brain Aging: The Updated Multi-protocol Approach in ADNI3 (2019) · cites this paper as Descoteaux et al., 2009

    The Introduction says that many voxels contain multiple crossing or otherwise complex fiber populations at DTI acquisition resolution. Section 4.1 also reports voxels with two- and three-fiber crossings. Neither passage gives the cited estimate of up to 90% of white-matter voxels, so the numerical part attributed to this source is unsupported. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Tractography results can vary across the large set of available diffusion models and tractography methods.

    “On one hand, tractography results may vary across the large set of available diffusion models (Afzali et al., 2020; Alexander, 2006; Panagiotaki et al., 2012; Yablonskiy and Sukstanskii, 2010) and tractography methods”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 29

  1. D. C. Alexander. Maximum entropy spherical deconvolution for diffusion mri. In Image Processing in Medical Imaging, pages 76-87, 2005.
  2. D.C. Alexander. Multiple-fibre reconstruction algorithms for diffusion mri. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1046:113-133, 2005.
  3. A. Anwander, M. Tittgemeyer, D. Y. von Cramon, A. D. Friederici, and T. R. Knosche. Connectivity-based parcellation of broca's area. Cerebral Cortex, 17(4):816-825, 2007.
  4. Y. Assaf and P.J. Basser. Composite hindered and restricted model of diffusion (charmed) mr imaging of the human brain. NeuroImage, 27(1):48-58, 2005.
  5. P.J. Basser, J. Mattiello, and D. LeBihan. Estimation of the effective self-diffusion tensor from the NMR spin echo. Journal of Magnetic Resonance, B(103):247-254, 1994.
  6. T. E. J. Behrens, H. Johansen-Berg, S. Jbabdi, M. F. S. Rushworth, and M. W. Woolrich. Proba- bilistic diffusion tractography with multiple fibre orientations. what can we gain? NeuroImage, 34(1):144-155, 2007.
  7. J. S. W. Campbell, P. Savadjiev, K. Siddiqi, and B. G. Pike. Validation and regularization in diffusion mri tractography. In Third IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI): from Nano to Macro, pages 351-354, Arlington, Virginia, USA, 2006.
  8. T.E. Conturo, N.F. Lori, T.S. Cull, E. Akbudak, A.Z. Snyder, J.S. Shimony, R.C. McKinstry, H. Burton, and M.E. Raichle. Tracking neuronal fiber pathways in the living human brain. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 96:10422-10427, August 1999.
  9. F. Dell'Acqua, G. Rizzo, P. Scifo, R.A. Clarke, G. Scotti, and F. Fazio. A model-based decon- volution approach to solve fiber crossing in diffusion-weighted mr imaging. Transactions in Biomedical Engineering, 54(3):462-472, 2007.
  10. O. Friman, G. Farneback, and C.-F. Westin. A bayesion approach for stochastic white matter tractography. IEEE Transactions in Medical Imaging, 25(8), 2006.
  11. FSL. Fmrib software library. University of Oxford, 2006.
  12. W. Guo, Q. Zeng, Y. Chen, and Y. Liu. Using multiple tensor deflection to reconstruct white matter fiber traces with branching. In Third IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: from Nano to Macro, pages 69-72, Arlington, Virginia, USA, April 2006.
  13. M. Hlawitschka and G. Scheuermann. Hot-lines: Tracking lines in higher order tensor fields. In IEEE Visualization 2005, pages 27-34, Los Alamitos, CA, USA, October 2005. IEEE Com- puter Society.
  14. Sabine Hofer and Jens Frahm. Topography of the human corpus callosum revisited- comprehensive fiber tractography using diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging. Neu- roImage, 32(3):989-994, 2006.
  15. M.A. Horsfield and D. K. Jones. Applications of diffusion-weighted and diffusion tensor mri to white matter diseases -a review. NMR in Biomedicine, 15:570-577, 2002.
  16. M. Lazar, D.M. Weinstein, J.S. Tsuruda, K.M. Hasan, K. Arfanakis, M.E. Meyerand, B. Badie, H.A. Rowley, V.Haughton, A. Field, and A.L. Alexander. White matter tractography using diffusion tensor deflection. In Human Brain Mapping, volume 18, pages 306-321, 2003.
  17. C. Lenglet, M. Rousson, R. Deriche, and 0. Faugeras. Statistics on the manifold of multivariate normal distributions: Theory and application to diffusion tensor mri processing. Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision, 25(3), 2006.
  18. S. Mori, B.J. Crain, V.P. Chacko, and P.C.M. Van Zijl. Three-dimensional tracking of axonal projections in the brain by Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Annals of Neurology, 45(2):265-269, February 1999.
  19. S. Mori and P. C. M. van Zijl. Fiber tracking: principles and strategies -a technical review. NMR in Biomedicine, 15:468-480, 2002.
  20. E. Ozarslan, T.M. Shepherd, B.C. Vemuri, S.J. Blackband, and T.H. Mareci. Resolution of complex tissue microarchitecture using the diffusion orientation transform (dot). NeuroImage, 31(3):1086-1103, 2006.
  21. G. J. M. Parker and D. C. Alexander. Probabilistic anatomical connectivity derived from the microscopic persistent angular structure of cerebral tissue. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, Series B, 360:893-902, 2005.
  22. G.J.M. Parker and D.C Alexander. Probabilistic monte carlo based mapping of cerebral con- nections utilising whole-brain crossing fibre information. In IPMI, pages 684-695, 2003.
  23. M. Perrin, C. Poupon, Y. Cointepas, B. Rieul, N. Golestani, C. Pallier, D. Riviere, A. Constan- tinesco, D. Le Bihan, and J.-F. Mangin. Fiber tracking in q-ball fields using regularized particle trajectories. In Information Processing in Medical Imaging, pages 52-63, 2005.
  24. Gary Price, Mara Cercignani, Geoffrey J.M. Parker, Daniel R. Altmann, Thomas R.E. Barnes, Gareth J. Barker, Eileen M. Joyce, and Maria A. Ron. Abnormal brain connectivity in first- episode psychosis: A diffusion mri tractography study of the corpus callosum. NeuroImage, 2007, In Press.
  25. A. Ramirez-Manzanares and M. Rivera. Basis tensor decomposition for restoring intra-voxel structure and stochastic walks for inferring brain connectivity in dt-mri. International Journal of Computer Vision, 69(1):77 -92, 2006.
  26. Jean Talairach and Pierre Tournoux. Co-Planar Stereotaxic Atlas of the Human Brain: 3- Dimensional Proportional System : An Approach to Cerebral Imaging. Thieme Medical Pub- lishers, January 1988.
  27. J-Donald Tournier, Fernando Calamante, and Alan Connelly. Robust determination of the fibre orientation distribution in diffusion mri: Non-negativity constrained super-resolved spherical deconvolution. NeuroImage, 35(4):1459-1472, 2007.
  28. D. Tuch. Diffusion MRI of Complex Tissue Structure. PhD thesis, Harvard University and Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2002.
  29. C.F. Westin, S.E. Maier, H. Mamata, A. Nabavi, F.A. Jolesz, and R. Kikinis. Processing and visualization for diffusion tensor mri. Medical Image Analysis, 6(2):93-108, June 2002.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Descoteaux, M., Deriche, R., Knosche, T. R., & Anwander, A.
Affiliations
  • Commissariat à l'Énergie Atomique et aux Énergies Alternatives (FR)
  • Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences (DE)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging
Published
2009-02
Volume
28
Issue
2
Pages
269-286
ISSN
  • 0278-0062 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-254X
OpenAlex
W2108895118
Cited by
698
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 51 · 2020: 41 · 2019: 47 · 2018: 53 · 2017: 49 · 2016: 48 · 2015: 58 · 2014: 46 · 2013: 51 · 2012: 43
FWCI
21.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
Keywords
tractography, probabilistic tractography, deterministic tractography, crossing fibers, fiber splitting, high angular resolution diffusion imaging, Q-ball imaging, spherical deconvolution, corpus callosum, superior longitudinal fasciculus, corona radiata, white matter connectivity
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Brain, Humans, Image Enhancement, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Models, Neurological, Nerve Fibers, Sensitivity and Specificity, Reproducibility of Results, Models, Statistical, Normal Distribution, Echo-Planar Imaging, Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review